25.04.2015 Views

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11<br />

FOREWORD<br />

In December <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09 <strong>the</strong> General Assembly adopted resoluti<strong>on</strong> 64/236 and agreed to c<strong>on</strong>vene <strong>the</strong> United<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Sustainable Development in Brazil in June <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>12. This C<strong>on</strong>ference, which will be<br />

held in Rio de Janeiro <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g> after <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment and Development, or<br />

<strong>the</strong> Earth Summit, represents a historic opportunity to take stock of <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>s over <strong>the</strong> past two<br />

decades, assess <strong>the</strong> progress made and <strong>the</strong> difficulties encountered and explore new forms of cooperati<strong>on</strong><br />

capable of expediting <strong>the</strong> transiti<strong>on</strong> towards <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The Member States have also<br />

agreed to analyse two main <strong>the</strong>mes at <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>ference: (a) a green ec<strong>on</strong>omy in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text of <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> and poverty eradicati<strong>on</strong>, and (b) <strong>the</strong> instituti<strong>on</strong>al framework for <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

The present document is divided into two parts: an analysis of progress made and difficulties<br />

encountered in Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean in implementing global commitments <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> since 1992, and proposed guidelines for moving towards <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

One of <strong>the</strong> milest<strong>on</strong>e achievements of <strong>the</strong> Earth Summit in 1992 was <strong>the</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

community’s acceptance of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept of <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which was broadly disseminated in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Rio Declarati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment and Development. Yet, twenty <str<strong>on</strong>g>years</str<strong>on</strong>g> later —and despite significant<br />

advances— <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> model is still unable to bring about simultaneous and synergic progress <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> social, ec<strong>on</strong>omic and envir<strong>on</strong>mental fr<strong>on</strong>ts.<br />

The world now faces an imperative for change: to move towards a new model of <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

with <strong>the</strong> value of equality at <strong>the</strong> core of its acti<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>on</strong>e which is capable of carrying forward simultaneous<br />

social <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>, ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth and envir<strong>on</strong>mental sustainability. Development cannot c<strong>on</strong>tinue to<br />

perpetuate poverty and inequality and to deplete natural resources and ecosystems. Undeniable evidence<br />

now exists that protecting ecosystems and ecosystem services improves health, physical integrity, food<br />

security and o<strong>the</strong>r basic aspects of human security and of individual and community well-being.<br />

A recurrent, cross-cutting problem is resistance to fully c<strong>on</strong>sidering all <strong>the</strong> costs of ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

activity in investment policies, stan<strong>da</strong>rds and decisi<strong>on</strong>s —or, indeed, <strong>the</strong> inability to do so. Hence <strong>the</strong><br />

multiple negative envir<strong>on</strong>mental and health externalities which lie at <strong>the</strong> root of almost <strong>the</strong> entire array of<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental issues. And, by exacerbating <strong>the</strong>se externalities, <strong>the</strong> high discount rates employed in<br />

investments lay a disproporti<strong>on</strong>ate share of <strong>the</strong> costs of ec<strong>on</strong>omic activity <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> present generati<strong>on</strong>’s<br />

most disadvantaged members and <strong>on</strong> future generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

The proposal by <strong>the</strong> United Nati<strong>on</strong>s to reflect up<strong>on</strong> a “green ec<strong>on</strong>omy in <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text of<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> and poverty eradicati<strong>on</strong>” aspires to catalyse <strong>the</strong> changes needed in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> principle of shared but differentiated resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities, <strong>the</strong> green ec<strong>on</strong>omy is understood in<br />

oppositi<strong>on</strong> to a brown ec<strong>on</strong>omy, which compartmentalizes, pollutes, excludes and destroys. A green<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omy is <strong>on</strong>e which augments and affords priority to human well-being and social equity, while<br />

significantly reducing envir<strong>on</strong>mental risks and ecological scarcities.<br />

This proposal advocates <strong>the</strong> redesign of specific public policies that promote a low-carb<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> pattern resistant to disasters and climate change, create green jobs and factor into decisi<strong>on</strong>making<br />

<strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic costs and benefits associated with <strong>the</strong> use of ecosystem services and materials. An<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omy for <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> reduces negative envir<strong>on</strong>mental impacts, such as carb<strong>on</strong> emissi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

and polluti<strong>on</strong>, promotes efficient use of energy and resources and avoids <strong>the</strong> loss of biological diversity<br />

and ecosystem services, thus improving well-being now and in <strong>the</strong> future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!