25.04.2015 Views

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

111<br />

In <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>08, <strong>the</strong> global average of per capita CO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s was 4.4 t<strong>on</strong>s, compared with 2.9 t<strong>on</strong>s in Latin<br />

America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean. Figure II.8 shows <strong>the</strong> variati<strong>on</strong> in per capita CO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s per country between<br />

1990 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>06. The case of Trini<strong>da</strong>d and Tobago is interesting. With an oil-based ec<strong>on</strong>omy, <strong>the</strong> cost of energy<br />

is lower. Although <strong>the</strong> country has supported some energy-efficiency initiatives, <strong>the</strong>re are few ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

incentives to expand <strong>the</strong>m. This translates in higher levels of CO 2 emissi<strong>on</strong>s per capita (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).<br />

In all likelihood, emissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>from</strong> energy sources in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to increase because,<br />

in spite of rising energy efficiency, a growing share of renewable energy sources (see chapter I), energy<br />

decoupling (where energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> increases proporti<strong>on</strong>ally less than GDP growth) (see figure II.9)<br />

and decarb<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> of energy (see figure II.10), <strong>the</strong>se efforts are still not enough to offset rapidly<br />

increasing energy demand. According to <strong>the</strong> energy intensity index by regi<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> period 1990–<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re has been no sustained process of energy decoupling in Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean, unlike in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r regi<strong>on</strong>s, or in <strong>the</strong> world as a whole, where rising incomes have been accompanied by lower relative<br />

energy c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> levels (UNEP/ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).<br />

Some countries have started to invest in low-carb<strong>on</strong> infrastructure, which could reduce carb<strong>on</strong><br />

emissi<strong>on</strong>s over <strong>the</strong> coming decades, for example by building public transport systems as an alternative to<br />

roads that encourage car use (Li and Colombier, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09, IPCC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07). While <strong>the</strong> large-scale impact of<br />

climate change and <strong>the</strong> huge effort needed to decouple <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth trajectory <strong>from</strong> energy<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> and emissi<strong>on</strong>s place an additi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>straint <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong>y also open up<br />

opportunities to implement soluti<strong>on</strong>s that have <strong>the</strong> added effect of expanding access to services (such as<br />

public transport), which fosters equality (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10; ECLAC, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10a).<br />

Figure II.9<br />

CARBON INTENSITY OF THE ECONOMY, 1990, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 AND <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07<br />

(Kilograms of CO 2 per c<strong>on</strong>stant dollar at <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05 prices in purchasing power parity terms)<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

China World United States OECD<br />

(high-income<br />

countries)<br />

Latin America and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Caribbean<br />

European Uni<strong>on</strong><br />

1990 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00 <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>07<br />

Source: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Commissi<strong>on</strong> for Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean (ECLAC), <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of World Bank, World<br />

Development Indicators [<strong>on</strong>line] http://<strong>da</strong>ta.worldbank.org/<strong>da</strong>ta-catalog/world-<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>-indicators.<br />

Note: OECD does not include Chile, Mexico or Turkey.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!