sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga sustainable development 20 years on from the ... - José Eli da Veiga
99 Table II.2 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (14 COUNTRIES): ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK LAWS, LEGISLATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, LEGAL DEFINITION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND INCORPORATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW-MAKING Country Environmental framework laws Has legislation on environmental impact assessment Has a legal definition of environmental damage Incorporates the principle of participation in environmental law-making Argentina Law 25675 (
100 Table II.3 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL AUTHORITIES Country Highest authority Antigua and Barbuda Ministry of Agriculture, Lands, Housing and the Environment Argentina Secretariat of Environment and Sustainable Development Bahamas Ministry of the Environment Barbados Ministry of Environment and Drainage Belize Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Ministry of Environment and Water Brazil Ministry of the Environment Chile Ministry of the Environment Colombia Ministry of Ministry of the Environment , Housing and Territorial Development Costa Rica Ministry of the Environment, Energy and Telecommunications Cuba Ministry of Science, Technology and the Environment Dominica Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources, Physical Planning and Fisheries Dominican Republic Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Ecuador Ministry of the Environment El Salvador Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources Grenada Ministry of the Environment, Foreign Trade and Export Development Guatemala Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources Guyana Environmental Protection Agency Haiti Ministry of the Environment Honduras Secretariat of Natural Resources and the Environment Jamaica Ministry of Land and the Environment Mexico Secretariat of the Environment and Natural Resources Nicaragua Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources Panama National Authority for the Environment Paraguay Secretariat of the Environment Peru Ministry of the Environment Saint Kitts and Nevis Ministry of Finance, Sustainable Development and Human Resource Development Saint Lucia Ministry of Physical Development, Environment and Housing Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Ministry of Health and the Environment Suriname National Institute for Environment And Development Trinidad and Tobago Ministry of Planning, Housing and the Environment Uruguay Ministry of Housing, Land-Use Planning and Environment (National Environment Directorate) Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Ministry of People’s Power for the Environment Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), on the basis of United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) [online] www.pnuma.org/deramb/legislacionporpaises.php?menusup=8&menuinf=3; and websites of the respective environment ministries and secretariats. As mentioned in the previous chapter, in many countries of the region, public policies and decisions relating to the environment are poorly coordinated and inconsistent, meaning that, while significant efforts are being made to enhance the environment, policies (such as subsidizing fossil fuels) that allow inefficient behaviour to continue or exacerbate problems that environmental legislation is seeking to resolve, remain in force. The difficulty of ensuring coordinated, consistent policies can be blamed at least partly on information failures that lead to inappropriate resource allocation (see chapter III on environmental statistics). Environmental protection objectives are usually treated separately —and ranked differently— from other public policy objectives (growth, employment or poverty reduction) mainly because the vital role played by the environment in sustaining economic activity and long-term prosperity is not fully recognized. The costs to the environment and human health in the short term are numerous (United Nations,
- Page 49 and 50: 48 Figure I.14 UNDERNUTRITION AND O
- Page 51 and 52: 50 Generally speaking, national hea
- Page 53 and 54: 52 covered by existing retirement s
- Page 55 and 56: 54 Box I.3 MAINSTREAMING DISASTER-R
- Page 57 and 58: 56 patterns in Latin America, with
- Page 59 and 60: 58 In fact, despite achievements ma
- Page 61 and 62: 60 The second productivity feature
- Page 63 and 64: 62 for groups that are usually bypa
- Page 65 and 66: 64 Figure I.18 LATIN AMERICA AND TH
- Page 67 and 68: 66 2009). In addit
- Page 69 and 70: 68 production will, however, height
- Page 71 and 72: 70 Lastly, climate factors are also
- Page 73 and 74: 72 C. ENERGY: ENERGY INTENSITY, EFF
- Page 75 and 76: 74 Fuel subsidies for private vehic
- Page 77 and 78: 76 Table I.9 LAWS FOR THE PROMOTION
- Page 79 and 80: 78 reduction must also be mainstrea
- Page 81 and 82: 80 Box I.7 URBAN SUSTAINABILITY IN
- Page 83 and 84: 82 Box I.8 THE ECO-EFFICIENCY OF UR
- Page 85 and 86: 84 Figure I.21 SELECTED COUNTRIES:
- Page 87 and 88: 86 E. STRENGTHENING THE STATE AND A
- Page 89 and 90: 88 Bibliography Acquatella, Jean (<
- Page 91 and 92: 90 Fresco, Louise (20</stro
- Page 93 and 94: 92 Perroti, D.E. and R. Sánchez (<
- Page 95 and 96: 94 (2010b), Achiev
- Page 97 and 98: 96 Table II.1 RATIFICATION OF MULTI
- Page 99: 98 Box II.1 (concluded) Union of So
- Page 103 and 104: 102 The same applies to the incenti
- Page 105 and 106: 104 Figure II.1 LATIN AMERICA AND T
- Page 107 and 108: 106 Box II.2 LATIN AMERICA AND THE
- Page 109 and 110: 108 Figure II.3 SHARE OF GLOBAL GRE
- Page 111 and 112: 110 Figure II.7 PER CAPITA CO 2 EMI
- Page 113 and 114: 112 Figure II.10 CARBON INTENSITY O
- Page 115 and 116: 114 Table II.4 LATIN AMERICA AND TH
- Page 117 and 118: 116 coast and in marine areas, the
- Page 119 and 120: 118 Box II.4 CENTRAL AMERICA: BIODI
- Page 121 and 122: 120 25 Figure II.1
- Page 123 and 124: 122 The valuable assets related to
- Page 125 and 126: 124 monitoring have been instrument
- Page 127 and 128: 126 Box II.7 LATIN AMERICA AND THE
- Page 129 and 130: 128 technology transfer is successf
- Page 131 and 132: 130 Table II.6 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT
- Page 133 and 134: 132 (a) Integrated water resources
- Page 135 and 136: 134 concessions, authorizations and
- Page 137 and 138: 136 water flows caused by land-use
- Page 139 and 140: 138 Climate change will exacerbate
- Page 141 and 142: 140 With regard to the safe recover
- Page 143 and 144: 142 MERCOSUR countries are implemen
- Page 145 and 146: 144 Unlike in the early 1990s, all
- Page 147 and 148: 146 Bibliography Acquatella, J. (<s
- Page 149 and 150: 148 Li, J. and M. Colombier (<stron
99<br />
Table II.2<br />
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (14 COUNTRIES): ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK<br />
LAWS, LEGISLATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, LEGAL DEFINITION<br />
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND INCORPORATION OF THE PRINCIPLE<br />
OF PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW-MAKING<br />
Country<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental framework laws<br />
Has legislati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
impact assessment<br />
Has a legal<br />
definiti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
<strong>da</strong>mage<br />
Incorporates <strong>the</strong><br />
principle of<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> in<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
law-making<br />
Argentina Law 25675 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>02) X X X<br />
Brazil Law 6938 (1981) X X X<br />
Chile Law 19300 (1994) X X X<br />
Colombia Law 99 (1993) X X X<br />
Framework law <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Costa Rica<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>ment (1995)<br />
X X X<br />
Cuba Law 81 (1997) X X X<br />
Law <strong>on</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
Ecuador<br />
management (1999)<br />
X X X<br />
Law <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment (1988)<br />
El Salvador<br />
and related regulati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
X X X<br />
Guatemala Law 68-86 (1986) X – X<br />
Decree <strong>on</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
management for <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
X – –<br />
Haiti<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g> (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>01)<br />
Nicaragua Law 217 (1996) X X X<br />
Panama Law 41 (1998) X – X<br />
Peru Law 28611 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>05) X X X<br />
Dominican Republic Law 64-00 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00) X X X<br />
Uruguay Law 17283 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>00) X X X<br />
Source: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Commissi<strong>on</strong> for Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean (ECLAC) <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />
Programme (UNEP), “Derecho y políticas ambientales. Legislación por países”, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>09 [<strong>on</strong>line] www.pnuma.org/deramb/<br />
legislaci<strong>on</strong>porpaises.php?menusup=8&menuinf=3.<br />
Since 1992 <strong>the</strong>re has also been a steep increase in <strong>the</strong> number of nati<strong>on</strong>al instituti<strong>on</strong>s devoted to <strong>the</strong><br />
envir<strong>on</strong>ment or to <str<strong>on</strong>g>sustainable</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>development</str<strong>on</strong>g>. All countries in <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> now have a ministry, secretariat or<br />
equivalent devoted to <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment and, in some cases, <strong>the</strong>y are linked to related issues, such as<br />
agriculture, housing, energy or natural resources (see table II.3). However, many of <strong>the</strong>se organizati<strong>on</strong>s are<br />
given lower priority than o<strong>the</strong>r areas of public policy, including in <strong>the</strong> allocati<strong>on</strong> of financial and human<br />
resources. Indeed, public spending <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment as a percentage of GDP did not exceed 1%<br />
throughout <strong>the</strong> first decade of this century (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10). 1 This applies not <strong>on</strong>ly to <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
level, but also <strong>the</strong> State and provincial levels. Local authorities have a crucial role to play in envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
management, as <strong>the</strong> sphere of acti<strong>on</strong> for many envir<strong>on</strong>mental problems is local. Local authorities are<br />
recognized explicitly in Agen<strong>da</strong> 21 (see chapter III).<br />
1<br />
As a reference, in member countries of <strong>the</strong> Organizati<strong>on</strong> for Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Cooperati<strong>on</strong> and Development (OECD) public<br />
spending <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment represents between 1% and 2% of GDP (United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>20</str<strong>on</strong>g>10).