24.04.2015 Views

Riggers Committee - British Parachute Association

Riggers Committee - British Parachute Association

Riggers Committee - British Parachute Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As a result of this incident Mike Bolton had proposed that all Tandem Student harnesses be<br />

equipped with securing pins as a mandatory requirement to prevent possibly a repeat incident<br />

occurring in future. Mike had stated that if this proposal was accepted, the necessary<br />

modifications to incorporate the pins could be made over a suitable timescale.<br />

The Chair reported that at the <strong>Riggers</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> meeting of 11 August 2005, the <strong>Committee</strong> had<br />

accepted a mod for locking pins produced by Bill Sharp. This mod had been accepted for general<br />

use on any student harnesses that have the same butterfly snap hooks as the Sigma (part nos:<br />

MS22042, MS22042-1, MS70121). A copy of the mod was tabled for information.<br />

A letter from Rick Boardman supporting Mike Bolton’s proposal had also been tabled to those<br />

present.<br />

Rick Boardman had stated that this subject had been debated at length by <strong>Riggers</strong> and STC in<br />

2009 following a similar incident, and there being a suitable mod in place, Rick had proposed that<br />

the use of locking pins be made a mandatory requirement. Although the <strong>Riggers</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> had<br />

voted in favour of this proposal, CCIs after much deliberation had not agreed and had voted<br />

against the proposal (by a large majority) as they believed the incident to be an isolated case.<br />

They felt that if Tandem Instructors carried all the necessary checks prior to exit they saw no<br />

reason why anyone should find themselves in freefall with a hook undone. At the subsequent<br />

Council meeting, Council had asked STC to revisit this decision, which they had done and had<br />

again voted against making the use of locking pins mandatory.<br />

There then followed a lengthy discussion on this subject. A number of <strong>Riggers</strong> present stated<br />

that they were concerned that we could be reacting to an incident to which it had not yet been<br />

established as to how it had actually occurred.<br />

The discussion then focused on the <strong>Association</strong>’s accepted modification for locking pins and<br />

some concern was expressed that if the holes were not drilled correctly into the butterfly snap<br />

hooks then further damage to the hook area could occur. It was also noted that not all pins<br />

were suitable with all hooks and some <strong>Riggers</strong> present believed it was an engineering feat to<br />

match up the hooks and locking pins in a suitable way that did not alter the strength and<br />

integrity in this area.<br />

It was felt that perhaps the <strong>Committee</strong> could consider developing an alternative method for<br />

locking pins, which did not alter the integrity of the hook area. However, they acknowledged<br />

that there was an accepted mod, which if carried out correctly was fine to use.<br />

Following further discussion, the <strong>Committee</strong> felt that the decision as to whether or not the use<br />

of locking pins be made mandatory was a matter for STC. However, they were not opposed<br />

to the principle of having some form of safety feature/locking pin, but they were concerned that<br />

there may be further implications involved.<br />

4. PERMISSION TO RUN 2 RIGGING COURSES AT NETHERAVON<br />

A request to host two Rigging Courses at Netheravon from 18 – 22 December 2012 and 5 – 9<br />

January 2013 has been received by George Panagopoulos, a copy of which has been circulated<br />

with the Agenda.<br />

George has stated that there would be two Rigger Examiners present throughout each Course.<br />

George had also reported that at this time both Courses were fully subscribed.<br />

It was proposed by George Panagopoulos (proxy) and seconded by Pete Sizer that the above<br />

request be accepted.<br />

Carried Unanimously<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!