Riggers Committee - British Parachute Association
Riggers Committee - British Parachute Association
Riggers Committee - British Parachute Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As a result of this incident Mike Bolton had proposed that all Tandem Student harnesses be<br />
equipped with securing pins as a mandatory requirement to prevent possibly a repeat incident<br />
occurring in future. Mike had stated that if this proposal was accepted, the necessary<br />
modifications to incorporate the pins could be made over a suitable timescale.<br />
The Chair reported that at the <strong>Riggers</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> meeting of 11 August 2005, the <strong>Committee</strong> had<br />
accepted a mod for locking pins produced by Bill Sharp. This mod had been accepted for general<br />
use on any student harnesses that have the same butterfly snap hooks as the Sigma (part nos:<br />
MS22042, MS22042-1, MS70121). A copy of the mod was tabled for information.<br />
A letter from Rick Boardman supporting Mike Bolton’s proposal had also been tabled to those<br />
present.<br />
Rick Boardman had stated that this subject had been debated at length by <strong>Riggers</strong> and STC in<br />
2009 following a similar incident, and there being a suitable mod in place, Rick had proposed that<br />
the use of locking pins be made a mandatory requirement. Although the <strong>Riggers</strong> <strong>Committee</strong> had<br />
voted in favour of this proposal, CCIs after much deliberation had not agreed and had voted<br />
against the proposal (by a large majority) as they believed the incident to be an isolated case.<br />
They felt that if Tandem Instructors carried all the necessary checks prior to exit they saw no<br />
reason why anyone should find themselves in freefall with a hook undone. At the subsequent<br />
Council meeting, Council had asked STC to revisit this decision, which they had done and had<br />
again voted against making the use of locking pins mandatory.<br />
There then followed a lengthy discussion on this subject. A number of <strong>Riggers</strong> present stated<br />
that they were concerned that we could be reacting to an incident to which it had not yet been<br />
established as to how it had actually occurred.<br />
The discussion then focused on the <strong>Association</strong>’s accepted modification for locking pins and<br />
some concern was expressed that if the holes were not drilled correctly into the butterfly snap<br />
hooks then further damage to the hook area could occur. It was also noted that not all pins<br />
were suitable with all hooks and some <strong>Riggers</strong> present believed it was an engineering feat to<br />
match up the hooks and locking pins in a suitable way that did not alter the strength and<br />
integrity in this area.<br />
It was felt that perhaps the <strong>Committee</strong> could consider developing an alternative method for<br />
locking pins, which did not alter the integrity of the hook area. However, they acknowledged<br />
that there was an accepted mod, which if carried out correctly was fine to use.<br />
Following further discussion, the <strong>Committee</strong> felt that the decision as to whether or not the use<br />
of locking pins be made mandatory was a matter for STC. However, they were not opposed<br />
to the principle of having some form of safety feature/locking pin, but they were concerned that<br />
there may be further implications involved.<br />
4. PERMISSION TO RUN 2 RIGGING COURSES AT NETHERAVON<br />
A request to host two Rigging Courses at Netheravon from 18 – 22 December 2012 and 5 – 9<br />
January 2013 has been received by George Panagopoulos, a copy of which has been circulated<br />
with the Agenda.<br />
George has stated that there would be two Rigger Examiners present throughout each Course.<br />
George had also reported that at this time both Courses were fully subscribed.<br />
It was proposed by George Panagopoulos (proxy) and seconded by Pete Sizer that the above<br />
request be accepted.<br />
Carried Unanimously<br />
2