The Computable Differential Equation Lecture ... - Bruce E. Shapiro
The Computable Differential Equation Lecture ... - Bruce E. Shapiro
The Computable Differential Equation Lecture ... - Bruce E. Shapiro
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 3. APPROXIMATE SOLUTIONS 61<br />
theorem for f(t) = 1 − √ 1 − t. Construct the sequence 3 of Polynomials<br />
on [0, 1].<br />
P 0 (t) = 0 (3.150)<br />
P n+1 (t) = 1 (<br />
Pn (t) 2 + t ) 2<br />
(3.151)<br />
We observe first that 0 ≤ P (t) ≤ 1. This may be proven by induction. First, ⇐=<br />
P 1 = t/2 ≤ 1 on [0, 1]. Next, assume that P n < 1. <strong>The</strong>n P n+1 = 1 2 (P 2 n + t) ≤<br />
1<br />
2 (12 + 1) = 1.<br />
Furthermore, each P n is monotonically increasing. Again, prove by induction.<br />
Certainly P 1 = t/2 is monotonically increasing with slope 1/2. Assume P ′ n > 0.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n P ′ n+1 = 1 2 (2P nP ′ n + 1) > 0 because the P n are all positive. Hence the function<br />
is monotonically increasing.<br />
Next we observe that the sequence of polynomials is itself increasing. To prove<br />
this, observe that<br />
P n+2 (t) − P n+1 (t) = 1 (<br />
P<br />
2<br />
2 n+1 (t) + t − P n 2 (t) − t ) (3.152)<br />
= 1 (<br />
P<br />
2<br />
2 n+1 (t) − P n 2 (t) ) (3.153)<br />
= 1 2 (P n+1(t) + P n (t)) (P n+1 (t) − P n (t)) (3.154)<br />
Since t/2 = P 1 (t) ≥ P 0 (x) = 0 for all t ∈ [0, 1], by applying this recursively we see<br />
that the sequence is monotonically increasing: P n+1 (t) ≥ P n t on [0, 1]<br />
.<br />
Since the sequence P 0 , P 1 , . . . is bounded and monotonically increasing it converges<br />
to some limit P (t). But<br />
lim P 1<br />
n+1(t) = lim<br />
n→∞ n→∞ 2 (P n(t) 2 + t) (3.155)<br />
P (t) = 1 2 (P 2 (t) + t) (3.156)<br />
0 = P 2 (t) − 2P (t) + t (3.157)<br />
P (t) = 1 ± √ 1 − t (3.158)<br />
We need to take the negative square root because of the restriction P (t) ≤ 1. Hence<br />
lim P n(t) = 1 − √ 1 − t (3.159)<br />
n→∞<br />
3 Use of the fixed point iteration x 0 = 0, x n+1 = 1 2 (u + x2 n) to find √ z, where z = 1 − u and<br />
x = 1 − √ z, was discovered in ancient Babylonia.<br />
c○2007, B.E.<strong>Shapiro</strong><br />
Last revised: May 23, 2007<br />
Math 582B, Spring 2007<br />
California State University Northridge