21.04.2015 Views

The Computable Differential Equation Lecture ... - Bruce E. Shapiro

The Computable Differential Equation Lecture ... - Bruce E. Shapiro

The Computable Differential Equation Lecture ... - Bruce E. Shapiro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178 CHAPTER 9. DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS<br />

In this system the input (or substrate) A is converted to B (called the product) as<br />

a result of interactions with an enzyme E. First, we have that A combines with E<br />

to form a molecular complex that we call X, at a rate that is proportional to the<br />

concentrations of both A and E, with constant of proportionality (called the rate<br />

constant) α. Let A, B, E, and X denote the total concentrations of each of these<br />

chemicals. <strong>The</strong>n for each molecule of X created, one molecule each of A and X are<br />

consumed, e.g.,<br />

X ′ = αAE + other reactions affecting X (9.124)<br />

A ′ = −αAE + other reactions affecting A (9.125)<br />

<strong>The</strong> second reaction tells us that X can be converted back to A and E at a rate β,<br />

X ′ = −βX + other reactions affecting X (9.126)<br />

A ′ = βX + other reactions affecting A (9.127)<br />

<strong>The</strong> third reaction tells us that X can also be converted to B and E at the same<br />

time:<br />

X ′ = −γX + other reactions affecting X (9.128)<br />

B ′ = γX + other reactions affecting B (9.129)<br />

Finally, we observe that E and X are really different forms of the same molecule,<br />

i.e., X is the same thing as E with A bound to it, so we have a conservation law<br />

Putting it all together gives us the following DAE:<br />

E + X = 1 (9.130)<br />

A ′ = −αAE + βX (9.131)<br />

B ′ = γX (9.132)<br />

X ′ = αAE − (γ + β)X (9.133)<br />

0 = E + X − 1 (9.134)<br />

This particular system is semi-explicit, that is, we can clearly tell which equations<br />

involve the explicit derivatives, and which equation involves the constraint. Thus<br />

there are (at least) three ways we can go about solving this system numerically.<br />

1. We could differentiate 9.157 and solve the fully explicit system of four ODE’s:<br />

A ′ = −αAE + βX (9.135)<br />

B ′ = γX (9.136)<br />

X ′ = αAE − (γ + β)X (9.137)<br />

E ′ = −αAE + (γ + β)X (9.138)<br />

This method has the disadvantage that it obscures the constrain, i.e., by looking<br />

at the equations it is not at all obvious that E + X = 1. In fact, this<br />

system satisfies any constraint E + X = C for any constant C, which you can<br />

see by adding the last two equations together to obtain d/dt(E + X) = 0.<br />

Math 582B, Spring 2007<br />

California State University Northridge<br />

c○2007, B.E.<strong>Shapiro</strong><br />

Last revised: May 23, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!