The Navy Vol_73_No_3 Jul 2011 - Navy League of Australia
The Navy Vol_73_No_3 Jul 2011 - Navy League of Australia
The Navy Vol_73_No_3 Jul 2011 - Navy League of Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NAVAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE<br />
By Dr Roger Thornhill<br />
Mastery <strong>of</strong> Naval Electronic Warfare (EW) can be a force multiplier providing an asymmetric advantage<br />
over almost all adversaries. For small outlays in investment it can provide big returns in the battlespace<br />
when it is needed. However, it is usually underappreciated, underfunded and under resourced, such as in<br />
the RAN. Dr Roger Thornhill explains the basics <strong>of</strong> Naval EW and the impact it can have.<br />
Within the field <strong>of</strong> naval weapons and sensors, which become<br />
increasingly complex with their use <strong>of</strong> the developing technology -<br />
particularly in electronics and s<strong>of</strong>tware - there is a clear and generally<br />
appreciated role for most <strong>of</strong> the principal elements. Guns, missiles<br />
and torpedoes are for attack and inflicting damage; radar and sonar<br />
are for detection; communications are for command and control;<br />
navigational aids help to determine position. But the role <strong>of</strong> EW is<br />
perhaps less well understood, though the term EW is familiar and the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> EW in naval operations has now grown. What it actually<br />
is, and how it is carried out, has in the past been shrouded in secrecy<br />
and it is really only in recent years that some aspects <strong>of</strong> EW have<br />
become a subject for discussion.<br />
In essence, EW is a practice <strong>of</strong> technical opportunism and expediency,<br />
exploiting weakness in an enemy’s use <strong>of</strong> electronics for his weapons<br />
and sensors, and cleverly taking advantage <strong>of</strong> features <strong>of</strong> enemy<br />
equipment design and/or his use <strong>of</strong> electronic equipment. EW has<br />
come about entirely through the ever increasing use <strong>of</strong> electronics<br />
in naval operations and it has proved to be very powerful in gaining<br />
tactical advantages.<br />
It is however, unlike other naval weapons and sensors in that it is<br />
basically a reactive rather than a direct activity. It reacts to what the<br />
enemy does in the electro-magnetic spectrum with the equipment<br />
he is known to have and how he uses it. Pre-conflict intelligence is<br />
thus very important. Consequently, the nature <strong>of</strong> EW is quite different<br />
from the use <strong>of</strong> other weapons and sensors. EW has evolved into<br />
an element <strong>of</strong> naval operations, which is important and has now a<br />
structure and established practice <strong>of</strong> its own. It can also command<br />
some expenditure, which many navies chose not to spend big on.<br />
Instead looking at the more ‘sexy’ end <strong>of</strong> the weapons spectrum,<br />
particularly when budgets are tight.<br />
Crewmen load a Mk-36 SROBC chaff launcher with a countermeasures rocket. <strong>The</strong> rocket carriers the EW payload high and slightly away from the ship to either jam, confuse or seduce a<br />
radar seeker. (USN)<br />
04 THE NAVY VOL. <strong>73</strong> NO. 3