18.04.2015 Views

Editor: I. Mallikarjuna Sharma Volume 11: 15-31 March 2015 No. 5-6

Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.

Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 Disengage with Pakistan completely! (Tarek Fatah) (20<strong>15</strong>) 1 LAW<br />

International terrorism, yet the beneficiary of<br />

billions of dollars of American largesse.<br />

In addition, before and during the Second<br />

World War, the motivating ideology behind Germans<br />

seeking world domination was the Nazi doctrine of<br />

Aryan supremacy, and all of us had absolutely no<br />

problem saying so. In a similar manner the<br />

motivating ideology behind the Warsaw Pact during the<br />

Third World War aka the Cold War, was Communism<br />

that sought the ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’ and no<br />

one, not even Dange or Namboodripad (Indian<br />

communist leaders) had any hesitation saying so.<br />

This begs the question. What is the ideology of<br />

the jihadi terrorists seeking world domination to hasten<br />

the End of Times? It is Islamofascism, the 20 th century<br />

doctrine of Islamism, which is the use of Islam as a<br />

political tool to establish Islamic supremacy on the rest<br />

of the globe. However, it seems we are too scared to<br />

dare mention the word ISLAMISM. Our American<br />

friends call it “Violent Extremism”. What is this<br />

“Violent Extremism”? Why beat around the bush<br />

and call it for what it is, i.e. Islamic Extremism?<br />

Let me show you a graphic clip that best<br />

illustrates our Islamic Extremism. … It is from<br />

Afghanistan and the tragic event happened just<br />

yesterday. [TF plays a VIDEO showing a mob of Muslims<br />

beating to death a 27-year old mentally challenged Muslim<br />

woman on charges that she burnt pages of the Quran. After<br />

beating her senseless, the crowd then set her on fire and<br />

watched her burn to death]. What have we Muslims become<br />

that we would beat and then burn alive a young woman?<br />

Even if she had deliberately set the Quran on fire (which she<br />

didn’t), did she have to be killed this way to serve Allah?<br />

What is to be done? I’ll make one general policy<br />

proposal and four specific recommendations:<br />

Definition of Terrorism under Resolution 1373<br />

On 28 September 2001 in the wake of the 9/<strong>11</strong>-<br />

jihadi terrorist attacks on the United States, the UN<br />

Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution<br />

1373. The resolution was a counter-terrorism measure<br />

adopted under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter,<br />

and is therefore binding on all UN member states. It<br />

marked a shift in international law. Until then,<br />

international law was presumed to be valid only if<br />

the concerned state had voluntarily signed the<br />

international treaty; whereas after 1373, the Security<br />

Council imposed the resolution on all member states.<br />

Following 1373, India made a call for a global<br />

convention on defining terrorism and finding<br />

commonly accepted means to combat it. Guess who<br />

obstructed the Indian initiative? Our good friends of<br />

the Islamic State, not in Rakka, but in Islamabad.<br />

Pakistan, the epitome of state terrorism scuttled the effort<br />

by raising issues about "causative factors," arguing<br />

that those who are "freedom fighters" cannot be<br />

labeled as terrorists.<br />

It is unfortunate that the powers that matter in<br />

today’s world should only look at the tactics and<br />

methods used by terrorists to define terrorism. To<br />

this day UN resolution 1373 exists only on paper. It is not<br />

too late. Let there be a comprehensive convention<br />

against terrorism under the United Nations, which<br />

has been pending since 2001, when India first<br />

proposed it. I say let us define Terrorism and then fight<br />

the state that feeds it.<br />

Four Recommendations<br />

But until then I have four recommendations<br />

for the Indian government:<br />

1. Disengage with Pakistan completely. <strong>No</strong> talks, no<br />

visits, no trade.<br />

2. Since Pakistan itches for parity with India, please<br />

shut down the silly <strong>March</strong> of the Roosters at the<br />

Wagah border cross point – the single most<br />

spectacular circus that puts the rogue state of<br />

Pakistan at par with democratic, secular and<br />

dignified Republic of India.<br />

3. End the ridiculous “Aman ki Aasha” that has been<br />

a one-way traffic of ISI aunties come to India and<br />

run circles around Indians, and even cause the fall<br />

of one of India’s brightest sons. ……<br />

4. Finally, please don't wait for a second Mumbai to<br />

create a Balochistan.<br />

Please start assisting the brave men and women of<br />

Balochistan today. Help the young men of Dr.<br />

Allah Nazar in the hills and Baloch exiles like<br />

Mehran Marri and Brahamdagh Bugti. Plan and<br />

work towards the policy goal, unwritten and unsaid, for<br />

the disintegration of the so-called rump state that refers<br />

to itself the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.<br />

I use the label 'so-called state', not only because there<br />

is nothing ‘Paak’ about Pakistan, but because of the fact<br />

Pakistan in 1971 changed its name to Bangladesh and<br />

what we call Pakistan today is merely Pakistan’s<br />

leftovers. – Thank you for inviting me as a speaker<br />

to this conference.<br />

- Jai Hind!<br />

* * * * *<br />

Law Animated World, <strong>15</strong>-<strong>31</strong> <strong>March</strong> 20<strong>15</strong> 144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!