18.04.2015 Views

Editor: I. Mallikarjuna Sharma Volume 11: 15-31 March 2015 No. 5-6

Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.

Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 A Historical View of Law (V.V. Reddy) (20<strong>15</strong>) 1 LAW<br />

Taj Mahal pale away before the steam engine and<br />

the electric motor. Therefore, it was no surprise<br />

when man set his foot on the moon by the 70s of<br />

the 20 th century. All these achievements are due<br />

to harnessing of the forces of nature by human<br />

labour – both physical and mental – and molding<br />

it into a super-technology. Alas, today technology<br />

has also become a private property through intellectual<br />

property rights. That is, as said already, what the<br />

law does is only the official recognition of the fact.<br />

LEGITIMIZATION OF LAWS: In order to legitimize<br />

the existing laws, periodic elections are held to<br />

the law-making bodies. However, in the words of<br />

Prof. G.K. Galbraith, “In the USA people have<br />

votes, but only the rich vote, as the poor is<br />

indifferent because they are worried of their<br />

jobs.” 9 This is true, because not many American<br />

Presidents were elected with a majority of<br />

popular vote. Still, the laws, both old and new,<br />

become legitimized. Then, what is the nature of<br />

the legislature, a senate or a parliament? Let us<br />

listen to the well-known American journalist,<br />

McChesney: “Throughout the capitalist era, whether<br />

in the United States of America or elsewhere, so<br />

to speak, power has been ‘bought’. <strong>No</strong>t for nothing,<br />

the U.S. Senate was described as a rich man’s<br />

club when there were no direct elections to it. But<br />

when there are direct elections now, the same<br />

effect is produced.” 10<br />

9<br />

G.K. Galbraith, Good Society: A Human Agenda, 1998,<br />

p. 142.<br />

10 Robert W. McChesney, Power and Politics in the United<br />

States of America, 1987, p. 106. Douglas Dowd also<br />

quotes McChesney and says as follows: “Throughout the<br />

capitalist era, whether in the United States or elsewhere,<br />

power has (so to speak) been "bought." <strong>No</strong>t for nothing,<br />

for example, was the U.S. Senate called "the rich man's<br />

club" in the years termed "the gilded age," or "the great<br />

barbecue" when there was no direct election of senators.<br />

But when that changed, means were found to bring about<br />

the same result, with respect to the Senate as with other<br />

areas of government – in keeping with Woodrow Wilson's<br />

remark (made in 1912) that "When the government<br />

becomes important, it becomes important to control the<br />

government".” {Douglas Dowd, Capitalism & Its<br />

Economics: A Critical History, Pluto Press, London,<br />

2000, p. 8}<br />

<strong>No</strong>w, coming back home, India is described as<br />

the largest democracy in the world. But the<br />

Indian Parliament may also be described as a rich<br />

man’s club. In the General Elections of 2014, out<br />

of a total membership of 543, <strong>31</strong>6 of the elected<br />

parliamentarians were billionaires. <strong>11</strong> They too<br />

were elected with a minority vote. Why this<br />

happened? Compared to the first general elections<br />

(1951-52), election expenses had increased by<br />

more than hundred times. <strong>No</strong>w a candidate to the<br />

Parliament [ordinarily] has to spend no less than<br />

Rs. 20 crores. Therefore, only the very rich can<br />

contest in the elections.<br />

Indian Constitution: The way our Constitution<br />

was drafted and approved was itself questionable.<br />

Ten months before independence (<strong>No</strong>vember<br />

1946), when Britain decided to leave, a<br />

Constitution Assembly was elected by the<br />

provincial assemblies, which were themselves<br />

elected by a limited franchise on 10 <strong>March</strong> 1946.<br />

The total members of this Constituent Assembly<br />

were 389, out of which 286 were elected by the<br />

Provincial Assemblies and 93 were nominated by<br />

Princely States. After two years of deliberations a<br />

Constitution was adopted on 26 <strong>No</strong>vember 1949<br />

and came into force on 26 January 1950.<br />

The Preamble of the Constitution declares:<br />

“India is a sovereign, [Socialist, Secular] 12<br />

Democratic Republic,” and adds “We the People<br />

of India give to ourselves this Constitution.” How<br />

286 indirectly elected and 93 nominated members could<br />

call themselves as representatives of the people of India?<br />

This is a mockery of democracy. Further, the<br />

appellation ‘Socialist’ is false because Article <strong>31</strong><br />

recognizes private property and its acquisition as<br />

a fundamental right. How socialism can be<br />

achieved by private property? Perhaps, in order to<br />

pacify the people, the Constitution has included<br />

the Directive Principles of State Policy, some of<br />

which are:<br />

<strong>11</strong> India Election Watch: Report on 2014 General Elections;<br />

the number of billionaires is based on the affidavits filed<br />

by the candidates along with their nomination papers.<br />

12 Added later by the 42 nd Constitution Amendment 1976.<br />

Law Animated World, <strong>15</strong>-<strong>31</strong> <strong>March</strong> 20<strong>15</strong> 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!