Editor: I. Mallikarjuna Sharma Volume 11: 15-31 March 2015 No. 5-6
Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.
Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(20<strong>15</strong>) 1 LAW Quake Outcasts v. Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery [NZ-SC: Court Opinion] F-163<br />
only 10 per cent of that value) and that the property<br />
damage in question was not insured against. 120<br />
[78] In relation to vacant land, the recommendation<br />
was to make 50 per cent offers. 121 This would<br />
ensure that the offers were not below postearthquake<br />
values and “help support the signal<br />
that the Government wants to encourage property<br />
owners to move on from the red zone”. 122 The<br />
estimated cost to the Crown of the purchase of<br />
the 65 sections in this category was $6.0<strong>31</strong><br />
million with additional transaction costs of<br />
$1.098 million. 123<br />
[79] As to the uninsured residential properties<br />
(with improvements) in the red zones, it was<br />
recognised that these included properties “where<br />
the owner consciously chose to not insure, as well<br />
as those that may have been insured at some point<br />
but do not meet the insurance continuity<br />
requirements of the Crown offer for insured<br />
properties”. 124<br />
[80] The offer to owners of uninsured residential<br />
properties was to be for 50 per cent of the land<br />
value only, with property owners retaining<br />
salvage rights to uninsured buildings and the<br />
possibility of relocation of buildings before<br />
settlement. 125 It was stated that: 126<br />
This offer supports the signalling objective for<br />
the red zone while providing some support for<br />
recovering elsewhere and acknowledging that the<br />
owners were not fully insured throughout the<br />
whole process.<br />
120 See [35.1] and [39].<br />
121 In an April 2012 paper to the Minister, CERA had<br />
initially recommended extending the 100 per cent offer<br />
to owners of vacant land in the red zones. However, this<br />
recommendation appears to have been abandoned by<br />
July 2012.<br />
122 Cabinet Paper (30 August 2012), above n 107, at [40].<br />
123 At [42].<br />
124 At [43]. The information accompanying the June 20<strong>11</strong><br />
offers specified that the Crown offer was not available<br />
to those that were not insured at the time of 22 February<br />
20<strong>11</strong> earthquake and those who were insured on 22<br />
February 20<strong>11</strong> but were not insured at the time of the<br />
offers: above n 90, at 8.<br />
125 Cabinet Paper (30 August 2012), above n 107, at [44].<br />
126 At [45].<br />
[81] The estimated cost for the purchase of the<br />
uninsured residential properties was $4.162<br />
million, with transaction costs of $1.266<br />
million. 127 It was estimated that there were about<br />
50 properties in this category. 128<br />
[82] On 3 September 2012, the Cabinet Business<br />
Committee agreed with and adopted the<br />
Minister’s recommendations in relation to both<br />
uninsured residential properties and vacant land<br />
and the other categories discussed above. 129 The<br />
Cabinet Business Committee re-stated the<br />
objectives of the purchase offers, including<br />
certainty of outcome, creation of confidence to<br />
enable people to move forward with their lives,<br />
and creation of confidence for decision-making<br />
processes of insurers, home-owners, business<br />
owners and investors. 130<br />
[83] After that decision, a paper dated 7<br />
September was circulated by CERA to the<br />
Minister of Finance (Hon Bill English), the<br />
Associate Minister of Finance (Hon Steven<br />
Joyce) and Mr Brownlee which recommended<br />
altering the land status of 37 properties in Port<br />
Hills area from white zones to red zones.<br />
Importantly, the paper stated that with respect to<br />
these areas, “CERA is acting on the principle that<br />
individual choice should be respected so long as<br />
life safety risks are adequately managed”. A<br />
footnote to that statement provided that “[t]his<br />
differs from the flat land where there is clear<br />
benefit in clearing as much of the red zone areas<br />
as possible as these are large contiguous areas<br />
that could beneficially [be] managed as one large<br />
entity”. 1<strong>31</strong><br />
127 At [49].<br />
128 The figure was an estimate because officials could only<br />
become aware of these properties through selfidentification<br />
or where insurance issues became<br />
apparent in the course of the Crown offer process for<br />
insured properties: see [47].<br />
129 Cabinet Business Committee (Minute of Decision),<br />
above n 5.<br />
130 At [1.2]. See above at [48].<br />
1<strong>31</strong> This evidence was adduced before the hearing but after<br />
the filing of the Case on Appeal.<br />
105<br />
Law Animated World, <strong>15</strong>-<strong>31</strong> <strong>March</strong> 20<strong>15</strong>