Editor: I. Mallikarjuna Sharma Volume 11: 15-31 March 2015 No. 5-6
Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.
Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F-160 Quake Outcasts v. Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery [NZ-SC: Court Opinion] (20<strong>15</strong>) 1 LAW<br />
Earthquake Recovery Authority and the<br />
Earthquake Commission”. 94 The Finance and<br />
Expenditure Committee’s report stated: 95<br />
Some of us are concerned that the decision to<br />
zone land into different categories was<br />
undertaken with insufficient consultation, was<br />
not based on clear criteria, and has proved<br />
divisive of communities.<br />
[63] The report went on to say: 96<br />
Some of us are concerned about a lack of<br />
engagement with the public over these zoning<br />
decisions, which affect the future of entire<br />
communities. In contrast with normal council<br />
processes, which would involve advertising and<br />
public submissions, information flows had been<br />
confusing and poorly managed.<br />
Recovery Strategy<br />
[64] After the June 20<strong>11</strong> decisions, community<br />
workshops were organised by CERA seeking<br />
public comment on a Recovery Strategy for<br />
greater Christchurch. The draft Recovery Strategy<br />
was made available for public viewing, comment<br />
and consultation from 10 September 20<strong>11</strong> to <strong>31</strong><br />
October 20<strong>11</strong>. The completed Recovery Strategy<br />
came into effect on 1 June 2012. 97<br />
94 Finance and Expenditure Committee 2010/<strong>11</strong> financial<br />
review of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority<br />
and the Earthquake Commission (29 <strong>March</strong> 2012). At 4.<br />
95 At 4.<br />
96 At 5. As is recorded in the transcript of evidence in the<br />
appendix to the report, the Hon Lianne Dalziel put the<br />
lack of consultation to the then chief executive of CERA.<br />
She said “The reason I wanted to kind of clarify the legal<br />
status of the land decisions is that if the city council is<br />
doing a plan change or a zoning change they would<br />
advertise it publicly, people would be able to make<br />
submissions, and there would be true engagement. But<br />
this has just been announced at press conferences —<br />
bang, a community’s gone”. Ms Dalziel’s overall point<br />
appears to have been that there had been effective<br />
compulsion in an allegedly voluntary process. The chief<br />
executive responded by saying “Well, all I can say is that<br />
at the moment people wanted us to make them an offer,<br />
because a lot of people wanted to go”: at 38.<br />
97 The “Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch” was<br />
approved by the Governor-General by Order in Council<br />
(Canterbury Earthquake (Recovery Strategy Approval) Order<br />
[65] The completed Recovery Strategy expressly<br />
acknowledged that, while it was envisaged when<br />
the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act was<br />
passed that the Recovery Strategy might have<br />
addressed the areas where rebuilding or other<br />
redevelopment may or may not occur, the<br />
Strategy had not been able to address that issue. 98<br />
The reason for this given in the Recovery<br />
Strategy was because: 99<br />
It is ... a huge and complex task to make<br />
decisions about land zoning and the location and<br />
timing of rebuilding. Similarly, it is not yet clear<br />
whether Recovery Plans – which are statutory<br />
documents with the power to overwrite a range<br />
of planning instruments – will be the most<br />
appropriate and effective way to provide<br />
direction.<br />
[66] While the draft Recovery Strategy that was<br />
released on 10 September 20<strong>11</strong> had made no<br />
mention of the future use of the red zone, the<br />
finalised Recovery Strategy stated the<br />
following: 100<br />
Residential red zone land clearance is overseeing<br />
the clearance of residential red zone properties<br />
and the return of the land to open space. It<br />
consists of three stages over two to three years.<br />
The first stage is to remove built structures and<br />
services. The second will involve larger-scale<br />
land clearance and grassing. The final stage will<br />
be to liaise with utility providers to remove<br />
public infrastructure no longer needed. After<br />
that, Land Information New Zealand will<br />
manage the open space.<br />
[67] To help achieve the outcomes of the<br />
Recovery Strategy, a Land Use Recovery Plan<br />
was directed to be created by the Minister to<br />
provide “direction for residential and business<br />
land use development to support recovery and<br />
2012). The Order in Council was notified in the New<br />
Zealand Gazette: “Canterbury Earthquake (Recovery<br />
Strategy Approval) Order 2012” (<strong>31</strong> May 2012) 61 New<br />
Zealand Gazette 1745.<br />
98 CERA “Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch”<br />
(June 2012) [Christchurch Recovery Strategy] at 2.<br />
99 At 2.<br />
100 At 40.<br />
Law Animated World, <strong>15</strong>-<strong>31</strong> <strong>March</strong> 20<strong>15</strong> 102