18.04.2015 Views

Editor: I. Mallikarjuna Sharma Volume 11: 15-31 March 2015 No. 5-6

Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.

Martyrs memorial special issue of 15-31 March 2015 paying tributes to Bhagat Singh and other comrades.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F-160 Quake Outcasts v. Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery [NZ-SC: Court Opinion] (20<strong>15</strong>) 1 LAW<br />

Earthquake Recovery Authority and the<br />

Earthquake Commission”. 94 The Finance and<br />

Expenditure Committee’s report stated: 95<br />

Some of us are concerned that the decision to<br />

zone land into different categories was<br />

undertaken with insufficient consultation, was<br />

not based on clear criteria, and has proved<br />

divisive of communities.<br />

[63] The report went on to say: 96<br />

Some of us are concerned about a lack of<br />

engagement with the public over these zoning<br />

decisions, which affect the future of entire<br />

communities. In contrast with normal council<br />

processes, which would involve advertising and<br />

public submissions, information flows had been<br />

confusing and poorly managed.<br />

Recovery Strategy<br />

[64] After the June 20<strong>11</strong> decisions, community<br />

workshops were organised by CERA seeking<br />

public comment on a Recovery Strategy for<br />

greater Christchurch. The draft Recovery Strategy<br />

was made available for public viewing, comment<br />

and consultation from 10 September 20<strong>11</strong> to <strong>31</strong><br />

October 20<strong>11</strong>. The completed Recovery Strategy<br />

came into effect on 1 June 2012. 97<br />

94 Finance and Expenditure Committee 2010/<strong>11</strong> financial<br />

review of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority<br />

and the Earthquake Commission (29 <strong>March</strong> 2012). At 4.<br />

95 At 4.<br />

96 At 5. As is recorded in the transcript of evidence in the<br />

appendix to the report, the Hon Lianne Dalziel put the<br />

lack of consultation to the then chief executive of CERA.<br />

She said “The reason I wanted to kind of clarify the legal<br />

status of the land decisions is that if the city council is<br />

doing a plan change or a zoning change they would<br />

advertise it publicly, people would be able to make<br />

submissions, and there would be true engagement. But<br />

this has just been announced at press conferences —<br />

bang, a community’s gone”. Ms Dalziel’s overall point<br />

appears to have been that there had been effective<br />

compulsion in an allegedly voluntary process. The chief<br />

executive responded by saying “Well, all I can say is that<br />

at the moment people wanted us to make them an offer,<br />

because a lot of people wanted to go”: at 38.<br />

97 The “Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch” was<br />

approved by the Governor-General by Order in Council<br />

(Canterbury Earthquake (Recovery Strategy Approval) Order<br />

[65] The completed Recovery Strategy expressly<br />

acknowledged that, while it was envisaged when<br />

the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act was<br />

passed that the Recovery Strategy might have<br />

addressed the areas where rebuilding or other<br />

redevelopment may or may not occur, the<br />

Strategy had not been able to address that issue. 98<br />

The reason for this given in the Recovery<br />

Strategy was because: 99<br />

It is ... a huge and complex task to make<br />

decisions about land zoning and the location and<br />

timing of rebuilding. Similarly, it is not yet clear<br />

whether Recovery Plans – which are statutory<br />

documents with the power to overwrite a range<br />

of planning instruments – will be the most<br />

appropriate and effective way to provide<br />

direction.<br />

[66] While the draft Recovery Strategy that was<br />

released on 10 September 20<strong>11</strong> had made no<br />

mention of the future use of the red zone, the<br />

finalised Recovery Strategy stated the<br />

following: 100<br />

Residential red zone land clearance is overseeing<br />

the clearance of residential red zone properties<br />

and the return of the land to open space. It<br />

consists of three stages over two to three years.<br />

The first stage is to remove built structures and<br />

services. The second will involve larger-scale<br />

land clearance and grassing. The final stage will<br />

be to liaise with utility providers to remove<br />

public infrastructure no longer needed. After<br />

that, Land Information New Zealand will<br />

manage the open space.<br />

[67] To help achieve the outcomes of the<br />

Recovery Strategy, a Land Use Recovery Plan<br />

was directed to be created by the Minister to<br />

provide “direction for residential and business<br />

land use development to support recovery and<br />

2012). The Order in Council was notified in the New<br />

Zealand Gazette: “Canterbury Earthquake (Recovery<br />

Strategy Approval) Order 2012” (<strong>31</strong> May 2012) 61 New<br />

Zealand Gazette 1745.<br />

98 CERA “Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch”<br />

(June 2012) [Christchurch Recovery Strategy] at 2.<br />

99 At 2.<br />

100 At 40.<br />

Law Animated World, <strong>15</strong>-<strong>31</strong> <strong>March</strong> 20<strong>15</strong> 102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!