NTFPs on Nakai Plate.. - TABI

NTFPs on Nakai Plate.. - TABI NTFPs on Nakai Plate.. - TABI

16.04.2015 Views

PART 1: SUMMARY A: Background This report describes the findings of a short mission (3 weeks) to study the use of Non Timber Forest Products (NTFP’s) on the Nakai Plateau, Khammouan Province, Lao PDR. This study is part of a larger study on resettlement options on the Nakai Plateau, which is undertaken by NTEC, the consortium aiming to construct the Nakai Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Power Project. The terms of reference for the NTFP mission were: - to identify type and value of NTFP’s currently used by the villagers on the Nakai plateau; - to identify traditional user boundaries for various NTFP’s, especially in the proposed resettlement area; - to identify potential opportunities for the NTFP’s that occur naturally and their sustainable use and value; - to identify potential opportunities for improvement in the use of NTFP’s in the resettlement area. A team of three staff members of the Department of Forestry, currently working with its NTFP Project (financed by Lao and Netherlands Governments, assisted by IUCN) were assigned for this mission. They were assisted by their field advisor in setting up the survey and in designing the report. The group used state-of-the-art Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) techniques such as building rapport, semi-structured interviews with key informants, cross checking, structured group meetings, participatory group sketch mapping, listing and ranking of NTFP’s, ranking of income and expenditure, wealth ranking, forest walks, rapid forest inventories and simple family interview questionnaires, to identify current use of NTFP’s in 5 selected villages on the Nakai plateau: Khone Ken, Kaoy, Nakai Neua, Sop Phene and Thalang. B: Main findings 1- interviewed villagers could identify 306 species of NTFP’s: 223 food products and 67 nonfood products. Among the food products, 50 species of edible leaves, 50 fruit species, 31 mammals, 28 fishes were identified. 2- kisi resin (damar resin from Shorea sp.), fish/frogs, edible rattan shoots (Raphis sp. and Daemonorops schmidtii), cardamom (Amomum sp.) and wildlife are considered by villagers to be the most important products from the forest. Food products are more numerous and considered more important (56%) than non-food products (44%). 3- According to ranking exercises, done with groups of villagers, NTFP’s account for 76 % of average family income over all five villages surveyed. Livestock sales are the second most important source of income (16%). Within the NTFP’s, kisi resin (14%), fish (12%), cardamom (11%) and wildlife (10 %) are the most important products sold. 4- In the same exercise, we used to ask villagers to also rank their main expenditures. Buying rice (18%), other food (14%), clothes (13%) and medicines (12%) are considered as the main family expenditures.

5- According to a survey over 100 of 191 individual households, family economies derived 41% of their income from NTFP’s, 32% from livestock sales and 28% from other sources in 1996. They spent 65% of their income on buying rice in 1996. These data differ from the outcome of the ranking exercise. Group discussions may underestimate the income from livestock. At any rate NTFP’s are by far the most important source of income in all villages. 6- In a normal year like 1996, of all 191 families living in the 5 villages together, 108 families or 57 % have a positive net income, and 83 families or 43 % had a negative income or rice shortage. Unprecedented floods destroyed most rice crops in the wet season of 1996, therefore most families must spend their entire income on buying rice in 1997. Many families will not be able to find enough money to satisfy their needs in rice, even though they will sell more livestock and increase their collection of NTFP’s. 7- Income from NTFP’s is higher among wealthy families than among poor families. However, in poor families NTFP’s are often the only source of income, as they do not have access to other options such as livestock raising, salaries or trading (see table A). Table A: Average family income for 1996 among all 191 families in 5 villages on the Nakai Plateau, divided into four income groups. Income group Richest Medium Poor Poorest TOTAL No families 48 60 41 42 191 NTFP's 99,740 107,555 60,461 70,487 82,926 Livestock 152,220 41,500 73,462 3,900 64,914 Off-farm 164,000 23,667 37,667 4,000 56,199 GROSSVALUE 415,960 172,722 171,590 78,387 204,038 Rice* -10,939 -30,936 -232,712 -294,634 -133,519 NET VALUE 405,021 141,786 -60,273 -246,464 70,519 *) Amount of money needed to buy rice (negative values) or surplus rice sold (positive values), based on a calculation of surpluses after family consumption, calculated as 300 kg/head/year. This finding has important implications for the planning of all income generating and social activities in the resettlement scheme. Poor families are the most vulnerable when access to NTFP’s is going to be reduced by the inundation of the former collection areas by the reservoir. Development agencies working with these families may want to develop special measures to counterbalance such losses. 8- From the survey, kisi resin comes forward as the most important NTFP for income generation, going up from 28% of NTFP based family income in 1996 to 56% of average family income in 1997 (see table B). Curiously rattan shoots have come up to second place in 1997, replacing bong bark which has been greatly reduced. Rattan canes have all but disappeared, cardamom remains stable. Most of these products are sold through Takhek, the Provincial capital, except for rattan canes which are mainly exported to Vietnam via Laksao. 9- Villagers estimate that 60 % of NTFP’s are collected from streams, ponds, paddy fields, grass fields, and fallow fields, which are not strictly forest areas. These areas are likely to be mostly situated within the inundation zone. Only 25 % was said to be derived from evergreen forest and mountains. Only 16 % of all NTFP’s are said to be derived from the proposed resettlement area, called “pa kok” by villagers. It is also remarkable that little difference in opinion was found between groups of men and women on this issue.

PART 1:<br />

SUMMARY<br />

A: Background<br />

This report describes the findings of a short missi<strong>on</strong> (3 weeks) to study the use of N<strong>on</strong><br />

Timber Forest Products (NTFP’s) <strong>on</strong> the <strong>Nakai</strong> <strong>Plate</strong>au, Khammouan Province, Lao PDR.<br />

This study is part of a larger study <strong>on</strong> resettlement opti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the <strong>Nakai</strong> <strong>Plate</strong>au, which is<br />

undertaken by NTEC, the c<strong>on</strong>sortium aiming to c<strong>on</strong>struct the <strong>Nakai</strong> Nam Theun 2<br />

Hydroelectric Power Project.<br />

The terms of reference for the NTFP missi<strong>on</strong> were:<br />

- to identify type and value of NTFP’s currently used by the villagers <strong>on</strong> the <strong>Nakai</strong> plateau;<br />

- to identify traditi<strong>on</strong>al user boundaries for various NTFP’s, especially in the proposed<br />

resettlement area;<br />

- to identify potential opportunities for the NTFP’s that occur naturally and their sustainable<br />

use and value;<br />

- to identify potential opportunities for improvement in the use of NTFP’s in the resettlement<br />

area.<br />

A team of three staff members of the Department of Forestry, currently working with its<br />

NTFP Project (financed by Lao and Netherlands Governments, assisted by IUCN) were<br />

assigned for this missi<strong>on</strong>. They were assisted by their field advisor in setting up the survey<br />

and in designing the report.<br />

The group used state-of-the-art Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) techniques such as building<br />

rapport, semi-structured interviews with key informants, cross checking, structured group<br />

meetings, participatory group sketch mapping, listing and ranking of NTFP’s, ranking of<br />

income and expenditure, wealth ranking, forest walks, rapid forest inventories and simple<br />

family interview questi<strong>on</strong>naires, to identify current use of NTFP’s in 5 selected villages <strong>on</strong><br />

the <strong>Nakai</strong> plateau: Kh<strong>on</strong>e Ken, Kaoy, <strong>Nakai</strong> Neua, Sop Phene and Thalang.<br />

B: Main findings<br />

1- interviewed villagers could identify 306 species of NTFP’s: 223 food products and 67 n<strong>on</strong>food<br />

products. Am<strong>on</strong>g the food products, 50 species of edible leaves, 50 fruit species, 31<br />

mammals, 28 fishes were identified.<br />

2- kisi resin (damar resin from Shorea sp.), fish/frogs, edible rattan shoots (Raphis sp. and<br />

Daem<strong>on</strong>orops schmidtii), cardamom (Amomum sp.) and wildlife are c<strong>on</strong>sidered by villagers<br />

to be the most important products from the forest. Food products are more numerous and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered more important (56%) than n<strong>on</strong>-food products (44%).<br />

3- According to ranking exercises, d<strong>on</strong>e with groups of villagers, NTFP’s account for 76 %<br />

of average family income over all five villages surveyed. Livestock sales are the sec<strong>on</strong>d most<br />

important source of income (16%). Within the NTFP’s, kisi resin (14%), fish (12%),<br />

cardamom (11%) and wildlife (10 %) are the most important products sold.<br />

4- In the same exercise, we used to ask villagers to also rank their main expenditures. Buying<br />

rice (18%), other food (14%), clothes (13%) and medicines (12%) are c<strong>on</strong>sidered as the main<br />

family expenditures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!