15.04.2015 Views

financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës

financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës

financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Financial Stability Report<br />

Number 3<br />

as follows: size = 40%, substitutability = 40% and interconnectedness = 20%. Individual<br />

bank level data have been used for the all 8 banks operating in Kosovo. Overall, 18 banking<br />

indicators were used (Table 2). All indicators within one category (e.g. size), were assigned<br />

equal weights. For example, an indicator that belongs to the size or substitutability<br />

criterion group was assigned a weight of 5 percent (because size/substitutability criterion<br />

weights 40% divided by 8 indicators = 5%), whereas indicators in the interconnectedness<br />

criteria group were given a weight of 6.67 percent (20% divided by 3 indicators = 6.67%).<br />

Table 2. Balance sheet indicators used to identify systemic importance of banks in<br />

Kosovo<br />

Criteria<br />

Indicators<br />

Size = 40%<br />

1. Cash and balances w ith CBK<br />

2. Deposits<br />

3. Participation share in banks' ow n resources<br />

4. Bank placements from other banks<br />

5. Securities<br />

6. Retained profit<br />

7. The share of the number of total depositors<br />

Substitutability = 40%<br />

8. The share of banking system liquid assets<br />

9. The share of agricultural loans<br />

10. The share of household loans<br />

11. The share of trade loans<br />

12. The share of industry loans<br />

13. The share of Government banking sector deposits<br />

14. The share of public enterprises' deposts<br />

Interconnectedness = 20%<br />

15. The share of total loans to total assets<br />

16. Bank placements on other banks<br />

17. Securities<br />

18. Subordinated debt<br />

In the following, we calculated the mean value of every indicator for the whole sector, which<br />

served as a reference point for individual banks’ indicators. For example, if the weighted<br />

mean of an indicator (e.g. deposits) resulted to be higher than the mean of the sector, that<br />

bank was considered to have systemic importance regarding the respective indicator.<br />

Besides the separate indicators, we also calculated the systemic importance of the banks<br />

concerning the criteria’s used in a similar fashion. For example, if the weighted mean of a<br />

bank resulted to be higher than the sector average for a criterion (e.g. size), that bank was<br />

considered to have systemic importance in that criterion. If the weighted mean of the banks<br />

were lower than the sector mean, these banks were considered to not have systemic<br />

importance in the <strong>financial</strong> sector. This procedure was applied for each bank and indicator<br />

separately.<br />

| 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!