financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës
financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës
financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Financial Stability Report<br />
Number 3<br />
as follows: size = 40%, substitutability = 40% and interconnectedness = 20%. Individual<br />
bank level data have been used for the all 8 banks operating in Kosovo. Overall, 18 banking<br />
indicators were used (Table 2). All indicators within one category (e.g. size), were assigned<br />
equal weights. For example, an indicator that belongs to the size or substitutability<br />
criterion group was assigned a weight of 5 percent (because size/substitutability criterion<br />
weights 40% divided by 8 indicators = 5%), whereas indicators in the interconnectedness<br />
criteria group were given a weight of 6.67 percent (20% divided by 3 indicators = 6.67%).<br />
Table 2. Balance sheet indicators used to identify systemic importance of banks in<br />
Kosovo<br />
Criteria<br />
Indicators<br />
Size = 40%<br />
1. Cash and balances w ith CBK<br />
2. Deposits<br />
3. Participation share in banks' ow n resources<br />
4. Bank placements from other banks<br />
5. Securities<br />
6. Retained profit<br />
7. The share of the number of total depositors<br />
Substitutability = 40%<br />
8. The share of banking system liquid assets<br />
9. The share of agricultural loans<br />
10. The share of household loans<br />
11. The share of trade loans<br />
12. The share of industry loans<br />
13. The share of Government banking sector deposits<br />
14. The share of public enterprises' deposts<br />
Interconnectedness = 20%<br />
15. The share of total loans to total assets<br />
16. Bank placements on other banks<br />
17. Securities<br />
18. Subordinated debt<br />
In the following, we calculated the mean value of every indicator for the whole sector, which<br />
served as a reference point for individual banks’ indicators. For example, if the weighted<br />
mean of an indicator (e.g. deposits) resulted to be higher than the mean of the sector, that<br />
bank was considered to have systemic importance regarding the respective indicator.<br />
Besides the separate indicators, we also calculated the systemic importance of the banks<br />
concerning the criteria’s used in a similar fashion. For example, if the weighted mean of a<br />
bank resulted to be higher than the sector average for a criterion (e.g. size), that bank was<br />
considered to have systemic importance in that criterion. If the weighted mean of the banks<br />
were lower than the sector mean, these banks were considered to not have systemic<br />
importance in the <strong>financial</strong> sector. This procedure was applied for each bank and indicator<br />
separately.<br />
| 87