financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës
financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës
Number 3 Financial Stability Report 74 |
Financial Stability Report Number 3 8. The Relationship between Banking Sector Competition and Loan-Loss Provisions Arben Mustafa* 17 Abstract This article investigates the relationship between competition and risk-taking in the banking sectors of Central and Eastern Europe transition economies, using bank level data for the period 2002-2009. The measure of competition is estimated using the Panzar-Rosse model, whereas the level of risk is proxied by loan-loss provisions. The results suggest that banks operating in more competitive markets tend to take lower level of risks. The model controls also for the impact of other bank-level and country-level indicators on the loan-loss provisions. 8.1. Introduction The issue of the risk taking behaviour of banks is deemed as very important both in the literature and among the regulators primarily because the potential bankruptcy of banks is considered to be associated with much larger negative consequences for the economy compared to the bankruptcy of other types of firms. According to Beck et al. (2010) banks differ from other types of firms because of three main reasons: a) potential bankruptcy of banks entails high social costs, which are mainly related to potential losses for the uninformed depositors who are not able to properly assess the risks they face; b) the bankruptcy of a bank can negatively affect also other banks through the contagion effect 18 , thus affecting negatively the overall financial stability and the payments system; and c) banks are special firms because of the presence of banking regulation, which implies also the existence of a safety net for banks that, among others, includes deposits insurance, lender of last resort and a procedure for the resolution of banking crisis. The existence of such a safety net may impose a considerable financial burden for the regulator and the government, thus increasing the overall cost of a bank’s bankruptcy. Acknowledging the potential costs associated with bank risks, the economic literature has largely dealt with factors that lead banks to take higher risks. In this context, considerable attention has been paid to the relationship between competition and the risk-taking behaviour of banks with a significant part of the literature arguing that competition has a significant impact on the level of risk taken by banks. However, the literature so far has not reached a consensus on the type of impact that competition has on risk-taking behaviour. The prevailing view holds that banks operating in more competitive markets take higher levels of risk. Based on this view regulators, especially in the past, have often undertaken *Arben Mustafa is Director of the Financial Stability and Economic Analysis Department at the Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo. Views expressed in this article are the Authors’ and do not necessarily express the official views of the Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo. 18 Contagion effect can occur in two forms: (i) the bankruptcy of a bank increases the uncertainty of other banks’ clients regarding the immunity of their own banks and may induce them to withdraw their deposits; (ii) because banks hold claims on other banks, the bankruptcy of one of the banks may cause losses also to other connected banks. | 75
- Page 25 and 26: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 27 and 28: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 29 and 30: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 31 and 32: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 33 and 34: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 35 and 36: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 37 and 38: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 39 and 40: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 41 and 42: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 43 and 44: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 45 and 46: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 47 and 48: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 49 and 50: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 51 and 52: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 53 and 54: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 55 and 56: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 57 and 58: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 59 and 60: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 61 and 62: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 63 and 64: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 65 and 66: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 67 and 68: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 69 and 70: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 71 and 72: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 73 and 74: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 75: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 79 and 80: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 81 and 82: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 83 and 84: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 85 and 86: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 87 and 88: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 89 and 90: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 91 and 92: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 93 and 94: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 95 and 96: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 97 and 98: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 99 and 100: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 101 and 102: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 103 and 104: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 105 and 106: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 107 and 108: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 109 and 110: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 111 and 112: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 113 and 114: Financial Stability Report Number 3
- Page 115 and 116: Financial Stability Report Number 3
Financial Stability Report<br />
Number 3<br />
8. The Relationship between Banking Sector Competition and<br />
Loan-Loss Provisions<br />
Arben Mustafa* 17<br />
Abstract<br />
This article investigates the relationship between competition and risk-taking in the<br />
banking sectors of Central and Eastern Europe transition economies, using bank level data<br />
for the period 2002-2009. The measure of competition is estimated using the Panzar-Rosse<br />
model, whereas the level of risk is proxied by loan-loss provisions. The results suggest that<br />
banks operating in more competitive markets tend to take lower level of risks. The model<br />
controls also for the impact of other bank-level and country-level indicators on the loan-loss<br />
provisions.<br />
8.1. Introduction<br />
The issue of the risk taking behaviour of banks is deemed as very important both in the<br />
literature and among the regulators primarily because the potential bankruptcy of banks is<br />
considered to be associated with much larger negative consequences for the economy<br />
compared to the bankruptcy of other types of firms. According to Beck et al. (2010) banks<br />
differ from other types of firms because of three main reasons: a) potential bankruptcy of<br />
banks entails high social costs, which are mainly related to potential losses for the<br />
uninformed depositors who are not able to properly assess the risks they face; b) the<br />
bankruptcy of a bank can negatively affect also other banks through the contagion effect 18 ,<br />
thus affecting negatively the overall <strong>financial</strong> <strong>stability</strong> and the payments system; and c)<br />
banks are special firms because of the presence of banking regulation, which implies also<br />
the existence of a safety net for banks that, among others, includes deposits insurance,<br />
lender of last resort and a procedure for the resolution of banking crisis. The existence of<br />
such a safety net may impose a considerable <strong>financial</strong> burden for the regulator and the<br />
government, thus increasing the overall cost of a bank’s bankruptcy.<br />
Acknowledging the potential costs associated with bank risks, the economic literature has<br />
largely dealt with factors that lead banks to take higher risks. In this context, considerable<br />
attention has been paid to the relationship between competition and the risk-taking<br />
behaviour of banks with a significant part of the literature arguing that competition has a<br />
significant impact on the level of risk taken by banks. However, the literature so far has not<br />
reached a consensus on the type of impact that competition has on risk-taking behaviour.<br />
The prevailing view holds that banks operating in more competitive markets take higher<br />
levels of risk. Based on this view regulators, especially in the past, have often undertaken<br />
*Arben Mustafa is Director of the Financial Stability and Economic Analysis Department at the Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo. Views expressed in this<br />
article are the Authors’ and do not necessarily express the official views of the Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo.<br />
18 Contagion effect can occur in two forms: (i) the bankruptcy of a bank increases the uncertainty of other banks’ clients regarding the immunity of their own<br />
banks and may induce them to withdraw their deposits; (ii) because banks hold claims on other banks, the bankruptcy of one of the banks may cause losses<br />
also to other connected banks.<br />
| 75