financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës

financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës financial stability report - Banka Qendrore e Republikës së Kosovës

15.04.2015 Views

Number 3 Financial Stability Report The share of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital to total regulatory capital was almost the same as in June 2011 (Figure 59). In June 2012, 16.5 percent of the total capital was Tier 2 capital (16.4% in June 2011), representing a total of euro 50.3 million. The main components of Tier 2 capital remained the subordinated debt (61.8 percent) and general provisions (38.2 percent). While the value of subordinated debt remained unchanged compared with June 2011, the amount of provisions recorded an annual growth of 26.3 percent amounting to euro 19.2 million. The banking system in Kosovo continues not use other instruments as components of the Tier 2 capital. Amounting to euro 253.7 million, Tier 1 capital comprises 83.5 percent of total regulatory capital (Figure 60). The dominant category in the overall structure of Tier 1 capital remains the shareholder capital, representing 71.4 percent of the capital (Figure 61). Other important categories of Tier 1 capital are also the profit of the current year, retained earnings and the reserve funds. In June 2012, this category represented about 30.2 percent of total Tier 1 capital. Shareholdr’s capital, as the main category of the Tier 1 capital recorded an annual growth of 7.8 percent, reaching a value of euro 181.1 million. Shareholder’s capital growth rate was significantly higher compared to June 2011, when the growth rate was 2.2 percent. The amount of current year’s profit, retained earnings and reserve funds reached euro 76.6 million, representing an annual increase of 5.7 percent (22.1 percent annual growth in June 2011). This category reported a lower level of annual growth mainly as a result of the profit decline as well as the reserve fund decline in June 2012 compared with June 2011. 6.4.3.3 Risk-Weighted Assets The value of total risk-weighted Figure 61. Structure of risk-weighted assets by risk category assets amounted to euro 1.76 100% billion in June 2012, which represents an annual increase of 7 percent (19.2 percent in June 2011). Lower annual growth is the result of a slower growth rate of 80% 60% 40% 72.8% 69.0% 77.6% 78.7% 20% loan portfolio as a key component 22.0% 24.2% 15.8% 15.7% of RWA. The structure of RWA remained similar to June 2011, being dominated by assets with risk weight of 100 percent (mainly 0% 3.8% 2009 6.4% 2010 5.5% 2011 4.8% 2012 consisting of loans and off-balance Source: CBK (2012) sheet items), the share of which amounted to 78.7 (Figure 61). Weight 0 % Weight 20% Weight 50 % Weight 75% Weight 100 % The assets with a risk weight of 75 percent accounted for 15.8 percent of total RWA. This category consists of loans secured by first mortgage on real estate, with less than 30 days past due. The category with the lowest share in the structure of RWA consists of assets with a risk weight of 50 percent, the share of which reached 0.8 percent of total RWA from. 12 12 This category consists of claims with maturity of 1 year or less in banks operating in OECD countries, but which are not classified or are ranked by Standard & Poor's with B or lower grade or which are classified by Moody's with P-3 or lower grade. 58 |

Financial Stability Report Number 3 6.5. Stress-Test Analysis In addition to the analysis of the the current state of the banking system’s exposure to credit risk, liquidity risk and solvency risk, the stress-test analysis represents another tool for assessing the resilience of the sector from potential shocks, both, in credit portfolio and in liquid assets. The results elaborated below are bank-level data for the period as of June 2012. This analysis tests the stability of the banking system against credit risk, combined with the interest rate risk and the exchange rate risk, as well as the ability of the banking system to preserve the liquidity level under hypothetical assumptions in case of large deposit withdrawals. 6.5.1 Credit Risk Methodology The analysis is based on the hypothetical scenario that the economic crisis in the European Union will continue reflecting in the Kosovo’s economy through the decrease of remittances and exports, thus discouraging the aggregate demand in the country. Consequently, it is supposed that the economic growth will be adversely affected, the output gap will increase and the quality of credit portfolio will deteriorate.This scenario assumes that the economic growth rate in kosovo will be 4 percent, which represents the average growth rate of the five previous years. Further, an economic decline of 2.0 percent for 2012 is also assumed, which in effect, would raise the output gap for 6.0 percent. For the purpose of assessing the impact of output gap in the quality of the loan portfolio, namely in non-performing loans (NPL), we have used elasticity coefficients for several countries in Central and Southeastern Europe, 13 which are taken from an unpublished IMF report Hence, considering a coefficient of 0.8 for the elasticity of NPLs against the output gap, the share of NPL to total banking system loans would increase by 4.8pp. The credit risk is combined with the interest rate risk and the exchange rate risk, where taking into account the recent developments in some of the eurozoen countries, a decrease of interest rates and depreciation of the euro against other currencies is assumed. In addition to the increase of the share of NPL to total loans, this scenario also assumes a depreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar by 20 percent 14 and a decline in the interest rates by 2.0 pp. A presumed increase in the NPLs ratio, leads to an increase of provisions; the depreciation of the euro affects the revaluation of the losses/profits from net open positions; and the reduction of interest rates affects the losses/profits from net interest income, considering the maturity mismatch between loans and deposits. Apart from the assumptions on the above mentioned shocks the expected profits are also considered for absorbing potential losses. In this context, it is assumed that revenues from “commissions and fees” and other non-interest revenues in 2012 would be equivalent to 60 percent of the level realized in 2011 (because it is assumed that there will be no increase of loans), while other components of the income statement are assumed to be similar to those in 2011. The assumed increase of NPLs is expressed through the migration of loans from performing categories (standard, watch, substandard) towards non-performing categories (doubtful and loss). The NPL growth was proportionally distributed within the categories of doubtful and loss loans, taking into account the initial distribution of NPL in these categories. NPL 13 IMF unpublished note “CESE Bank Loss Projection and Stress Testing Exercise”, July 2009. 14 Supozim i bazuar në të dhënat historike mbi luhatjen e kursit të këmbimit valutor euro/dollar amerikan. | 59

Financial Stability Report<br />

Number 3<br />

6.5. Stress-Test Analysis<br />

In addition to the analysis of the the current state of the banking system’s exposure to<br />

credit risk, liquidity risk and solvency risk, the stress-test analysis represents another tool<br />

for assessing the resilience of the sector from potential shocks, both, in credit portfolio and<br />

in liquid assets. The results elaborated below are bank-level data for the period as of June<br />

2012. This analysis tests the <strong>stability</strong> of the banking system against credit risk, combined<br />

with the interest rate risk and the exchange rate risk, as well as the ability of the banking<br />

system to preserve the liquidity level under hypothetical assumptions in case of large<br />

deposit withdrawals.<br />

6.5.1 Credit Risk<br />

Methodology<br />

The analysis is based on the hypothetical scenario that the economic crisis in the European<br />

Union will continue reflecting in the Kosovo’s economy through the decrease of remittances<br />

and exports, thus discouraging the aggregate demand in the country. Consequently, it is<br />

supposed that the economic growth will be adversely affected, the output gap will increase<br />

and the quality of credit portfolio will deteriorate.This scenario assumes that the economic<br />

growth rate in kosovo will be 4 percent, which represents the average growth rate of the<br />

five previous years. Further, an economic decline of 2.0 percent for 2012 is also assumed,<br />

which in effect, would raise the output gap for 6.0 percent. For the purpose of assessing the<br />

impact of output gap in the quality of the loan portfolio, namely in non-performing loans<br />

(NPL), we have used elasticity coefficients for several countries in Central and<br />

Southeastern Europe, 13 which are taken from an unpublished IMF <strong>report</strong> Hence,<br />

considering a coefficient of 0.8 for the elasticity of NPLs against the output gap, the share of<br />

NPL to total banking system loans would increase by 4.8pp. The credit risk is combined<br />

with the interest rate risk and the exchange rate risk, where taking into account the recent<br />

developments in some of the eurozoen countries, a decrease of interest rates and<br />

depreciation of the euro against other currencies is assumed. In addition to the increase of<br />

the share of NPL to total loans, this scenario also assumes a depreciation of the euro<br />

against the U.S. dollar by 20 percent 14 and a decline in the interest rates by 2.0 pp.<br />

A presumed increase in the NPLs ratio, leads to an increase of provisions; the depreciation<br />

of the euro affects the revaluation of the losses/profits from net open positions; and the<br />

reduction of interest rates affects the losses/profits from net interest income, considering<br />

the maturity mismatch between loans and deposits. Apart from the assumptions on the<br />

above mentioned shocks the expected profits are also considered for absorbing potential<br />

losses. In this context, it is assumed that revenues from “commissions and fees” and other<br />

non-interest revenues in 2012 would be equivalent to 60 percent of the level realized in<br />

2011 (because it is assumed that there will be no increase of loans), while other components<br />

of the income statement are assumed to be similar to those in 2011.<br />

The assumed increase of NPLs is expressed through the migration of loans from performing<br />

categories (standard, watch, substandard) towards non-performing categories (doubtful and<br />

loss). The NPL growth was proportionally distributed within the categories of doubtful and<br />

loss loans, taking into account the initial distribution of NPL in these categories. NPL<br />

13 IMF unpublished note “CESE Bank Loss Projection and Stress Testing Exercise”, July 2009.<br />

14 Supozim i bazuar në të dhënat historike mbi luhatjen e kursit të këmbimit valutor euro/dollar amerikan.<br />

| 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!