You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
in 1994, they recognised veterans officially.<br />
Of course they had left it far too late,<br />
as veterans had made other arrangements<br />
by forming their own National<br />
groups, with the first non-UCI world<br />
body, free Federations coming along<br />
in 1985, changing soon after to the<br />
current ICF. In England, of course, the<br />
BCF were reluctant to take on the UCI,<br />
knowing that the VTTA had around<br />
5000 members, and failed to instruct<br />
their own veterans organisation (the<br />
VCRA) to bring in the now-accepted<br />
age categories. And so first TLI (1983)<br />
and then <strong>LVRC</strong> (1986) came into being.<br />
In 1995 the UCI ‘World Masters<br />
Road Championships’ came to St<br />
Johann, but on advice from the organisers,<br />
who told the UCI that only 30%<br />
of veterans had UCI licences, the controlling<br />
world body was forced to offer<br />
day licences to all non-UCI riders:<br />
what a climb-down for the world body.<br />
However, with the establishment of<br />
the time-trial Worlds, brought in in<br />
2000, the UCI now feel strong enough<br />
to do away with the day licence. Possibly<br />
organisations like the BCF feel that<br />
the day licence was costing them<br />
money, and they wanted their pound<br />
of flesh. Sadly, St Johann never needed<br />
UCI recognition, as veterans worldwide<br />
recognised St Johann for what it<br />
was. Around 2500 riders compete<br />
there each year, and with family and<br />
friends the eight days is a major factor<br />
with the Austrian Tourist Board. Let’s<br />
hope that UCI intransigence does not<br />
cock it all up.<br />
From John Bettinson<br />
I was out with the lads on Sunday<br />
morning and as usual I was offering<br />
some unsolicited advice and, as usual<br />
getting the same response: ‘Oh no it<br />
isn’t.’<br />
‘Piss off. What do you know about<br />
it?’<br />
‘You always say the same old thing;<br />
thousands of miles. Not everyone responds<br />
to the same training’<br />
I take it as an affront that these ‘no<br />
knows’ dismiss anything I tell them. At<br />
this time of<br />
year I will specify bulk miles but<br />
come end of March (pre-supposing<br />
they ever were ready) I will tell them<br />
the next bit.<br />
Well, because I got home early, I<br />
went for a walk around Tarn Hows.<br />
Enjoying the sun coming down through<br />
the trees a thought suddenly struck me.<br />
There is such a variety of trees that that<br />
I had to exclaim to my wife, ‘There is<br />
no right way to be a tree, is there?’<br />
And I couldn’t help but draw an analogy<br />
with my understanding of training.<br />
My heart sank and all self-confidence<br />
drained from me. Maybe I do know<br />
bugger nothing?<br />
We walked on for a while, this revelation<br />
tearing at me. Then just as suddenly<br />
I thought about what the trees<br />
do each have in common.<br />
They all have strong root systems<br />
(or else fail)<br />
They all have trunks and branches<br />
They all have leaves that reach up<br />
for the sun<br />
They all have seasons<br />
They all have reproduction (No!<br />
Best ignore that one)<br />
They all have survival techniques<br />
in adverse conditions<br />
Oh yes! And they all know to bend<br />
in the wind rather than snap.<br />
Come to think of it, at least 90% is<br />
common with scarcely 5% negotiable.<br />
Just the way I feel about training and<br />
improving ones fitness. Morale returned<br />
immediately.<br />
So, the next time they suggest ‘You<br />
know bugger nothing’, I’ll just reply<br />
‘You’re all wrong. I know bugger all.’<br />
From Dave Moss, Dumfries<br />
I was amazed to read the criticism of<br />
the legitimate tactics of Tom McCall<br />
(and others like him).What unwritten<br />
rule is Dave Orford talking about? It<br />
must be in the special rulebook for the<br />
tactically inept.<br />
The object of a road race is to win at<br />
the slowest possible speed using the<br />
minimum of effort. There is no point<br />
busting a gut just to increase a break’s<br />
advantage at the finish. How, I wonder,<br />
do Tom’s critics think someone<br />
who fancies their chances at winning<br />
a bunch sprint, react to a break?<br />
I would suggest that the correct tactic<br />
is, a) if the break looks dangerous<br />
try and join it; b) sit in and on no account<br />
contribute to the work; c) if you<br />
cannot sicken the others so that they<br />
sit up, pop out and win the sprint at<br />
the end; d) ignore all criticism from bad<br />
losers and keep smiling. Any nonsprinters<br />
in the break should come up<br />
with their own ideas of how to get<br />
away from you: if they’re not good<br />
enough, it’s not your problem. A bit of<br />
verbal abuse to try and persuade you<br />
to share the work is all part of the<br />
game,but you should develop a thick<br />
skin and ride your own race. Only sad<br />
losers continue to moan after the race.<br />
You could drag the bunch up to the<br />
break, but you can’t do that all day and<br />
some other wheel sucking sprinter<br />
might just take advantage at the end!<br />
So, non-sprinters: get a life, remember<br />
you’re in a road race, not a timetrial,<br />
and get your tactics sorted: don’t<br />
blame the winner for your failings.<br />
As for me, I’d be back in the bunch<br />
hanging on for dear life. In fact, I would<br />
like to remind everyone of the other<br />
unwritten rule: If there is an overweight<br />
bearded northerner in the race, who<br />
seems to be finding it hard going, you<br />
MUST ease off and give him a push<br />
up the hills.<br />
From John Bettinson<br />
I’m a bit miffed at Tom McCall telling<br />
us to turn the other cheek to those famous<br />
followers who squash every<br />
move and sit in for the sprint. I’ve got<br />
more enjoyable things I can do than<br />
get up at 5 a.m., fill up with petrol,<br />
drive to the other coast and ride<br />
around with guys I don’t particularly<br />
respect sat tightly on my back wheel.<br />
From Ian Moore, Region 2<br />
Now that the Special General Meeting<br />
has passed and everything, we hope,<br />
has settled down, I feel obliged to remind<br />
members of the <strong>LVRC</strong>’s objective:<br />
‘the provision of a programme of<br />
competitive and social cycling events<br />
for male and female members of 40<br />
years of age and over’. Let’s get back<br />
to basics and enjoy our sport, rather<br />
than quarrelling.<br />
From Terry Potter, Preston<br />
I read about the ‘well-kept secret’ AGM<br />
and note that most of the amendments<br />
went through unopposed – so it seems<br />
that most of those who attended were<br />
in agreement. Where were those who<br />
should, apparently, have been opposing<br />
not only the amendments, but the<br />
running of the meeting at all?<br />
It’s as well Percy Stallard has left us<br />
– the air might well have been blue at<br />
the waste of time and money. Years ago<br />
when the BLRC was formed, if we had<br />
always gone strictly by the book, we’d<br />
still be in black tights and well-kept<br />
secret events. The meeting was democratic,<br />
and this is what we’re all about.<br />
Page 18 <strong>Veteran</strong> Leaguer: Winter 2002