14.04.2015 Views

Veteran - LVRC

Veteran - LVRC

Veteran - LVRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in 1994, they recognised veterans officially.<br />

Of course they had left it far too late,<br />

as veterans had made other arrangements<br />

by forming their own National<br />

groups, with the first non-UCI world<br />

body, free Federations coming along<br />

in 1985, changing soon after to the<br />

current ICF. In England, of course, the<br />

BCF were reluctant to take on the UCI,<br />

knowing that the VTTA had around<br />

5000 members, and failed to instruct<br />

their own veterans organisation (the<br />

VCRA) to bring in the now-accepted<br />

age categories. And so first TLI (1983)<br />

and then <strong>LVRC</strong> (1986) came into being.<br />

In 1995 the UCI ‘World Masters<br />

Road Championships’ came to St<br />

Johann, but on advice from the organisers,<br />

who told the UCI that only 30%<br />

of veterans had UCI licences, the controlling<br />

world body was forced to offer<br />

day licences to all non-UCI riders:<br />

what a climb-down for the world body.<br />

However, with the establishment of<br />

the time-trial Worlds, brought in in<br />

2000, the UCI now feel strong enough<br />

to do away with the day licence. Possibly<br />

organisations like the BCF feel that<br />

the day licence was costing them<br />

money, and they wanted their pound<br />

of flesh. Sadly, St Johann never needed<br />

UCI recognition, as veterans worldwide<br />

recognised St Johann for what it<br />

was. Around 2500 riders compete<br />

there each year, and with family and<br />

friends the eight days is a major factor<br />

with the Austrian Tourist Board. Let’s<br />

hope that UCI intransigence does not<br />

cock it all up.<br />

From John Bettinson<br />

I was out with the lads on Sunday<br />

morning and as usual I was offering<br />

some unsolicited advice and, as usual<br />

getting the same response: ‘Oh no it<br />

isn’t.’<br />

‘Piss off. What do you know about<br />

it?’<br />

‘You always say the same old thing;<br />

thousands of miles. Not everyone responds<br />

to the same training’<br />

I take it as an affront that these ‘no<br />

knows’ dismiss anything I tell them. At<br />

this time of<br />

year I will specify bulk miles but<br />

come end of March (pre-supposing<br />

they ever were ready) I will tell them<br />

the next bit.<br />

Well, because I got home early, I<br />

went for a walk around Tarn Hows.<br />

Enjoying the sun coming down through<br />

the trees a thought suddenly struck me.<br />

There is such a variety of trees that that<br />

I had to exclaim to my wife, ‘There is<br />

no right way to be a tree, is there?’<br />

And I couldn’t help but draw an analogy<br />

with my understanding of training.<br />

My heart sank and all self-confidence<br />

drained from me. Maybe I do know<br />

bugger nothing?<br />

We walked on for a while, this revelation<br />

tearing at me. Then just as suddenly<br />

I thought about what the trees<br />

do each have in common.<br />

They all have strong root systems<br />

(or else fail)<br />

They all have trunks and branches<br />

They all have leaves that reach up<br />

for the sun<br />

They all have seasons<br />

They all have reproduction (No!<br />

Best ignore that one)<br />

They all have survival techniques<br />

in adverse conditions<br />

Oh yes! And they all know to bend<br />

in the wind rather than snap.<br />

Come to think of it, at least 90% is<br />

common with scarcely 5% negotiable.<br />

Just the way I feel about training and<br />

improving ones fitness. Morale returned<br />

immediately.<br />

So, the next time they suggest ‘You<br />

know bugger nothing’, I’ll just reply<br />

‘You’re all wrong. I know bugger all.’<br />

From Dave Moss, Dumfries<br />

I was amazed to read the criticism of<br />

the legitimate tactics of Tom McCall<br />

(and others like him).What unwritten<br />

rule is Dave Orford talking about? It<br />

must be in the special rulebook for the<br />

tactically inept.<br />

The object of a road race is to win at<br />

the slowest possible speed using the<br />

minimum of effort. There is no point<br />

busting a gut just to increase a break’s<br />

advantage at the finish. How, I wonder,<br />

do Tom’s critics think someone<br />

who fancies their chances at winning<br />

a bunch sprint, react to a break?<br />

I would suggest that the correct tactic<br />

is, a) if the break looks dangerous<br />

try and join it; b) sit in and on no account<br />

contribute to the work; c) if you<br />

cannot sicken the others so that they<br />

sit up, pop out and win the sprint at<br />

the end; d) ignore all criticism from bad<br />

losers and keep smiling. Any nonsprinters<br />

in the break should come up<br />

with their own ideas of how to get<br />

away from you: if they’re not good<br />

enough, it’s not your problem. A bit of<br />

verbal abuse to try and persuade you<br />

to share the work is all part of the<br />

game,but you should develop a thick<br />

skin and ride your own race. Only sad<br />

losers continue to moan after the race.<br />

You could drag the bunch up to the<br />

break, but you can’t do that all day and<br />

some other wheel sucking sprinter<br />

might just take advantage at the end!<br />

So, non-sprinters: get a life, remember<br />

you’re in a road race, not a timetrial,<br />

and get your tactics sorted: don’t<br />

blame the winner for your failings.<br />

As for me, I’d be back in the bunch<br />

hanging on for dear life. In fact, I would<br />

like to remind everyone of the other<br />

unwritten rule: If there is an overweight<br />

bearded northerner in the race, who<br />

seems to be finding it hard going, you<br />

MUST ease off and give him a push<br />

up the hills.<br />

From John Bettinson<br />

I’m a bit miffed at Tom McCall telling<br />

us to turn the other cheek to those famous<br />

followers who squash every<br />

move and sit in for the sprint. I’ve got<br />

more enjoyable things I can do than<br />

get up at 5 a.m., fill up with petrol,<br />

drive to the other coast and ride<br />

around with guys I don’t particularly<br />

respect sat tightly on my back wheel.<br />

From Ian Moore, Region 2<br />

Now that the Special General Meeting<br />

has passed and everything, we hope,<br />

has settled down, I feel obliged to remind<br />

members of the <strong>LVRC</strong>’s objective:<br />

‘the provision of a programme of<br />

competitive and social cycling events<br />

for male and female members of 40<br />

years of age and over’. Let’s get back<br />

to basics and enjoy our sport, rather<br />

than quarrelling.<br />

From Terry Potter, Preston<br />

I read about the ‘well-kept secret’ AGM<br />

and note that most of the amendments<br />

went through unopposed – so it seems<br />

that most of those who attended were<br />

in agreement. Where were those who<br />

should, apparently, have been opposing<br />

not only the amendments, but the<br />

running of the meeting at all?<br />

It’s as well Percy Stallard has left us<br />

– the air might well have been blue at<br />

the waste of time and money. Years ago<br />

when the BLRC was formed, if we had<br />

always gone strictly by the book, we’d<br />

still be in black tights and well-kept<br />

secret events. The meeting was democratic,<br />

and this is what we’re all about.<br />

Page 18 <strong>Veteran</strong> Leaguer: Winter 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!