13.04.2015 Views

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Soames Affair 75<br />

After effects<br />

The ramifications <strong>of</strong> the ‘Soames affair’ played out for the rest <strong>of</strong> the spring, and<br />

were mainly positive for Britain. The governments <strong>of</strong> the Five accepted the British<br />

account <strong>of</strong> events. 83 As people continued to <strong>de</strong>bate the rights and wrongs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

affair, British aims in Europe were plastered across European newspapers, almost<br />

all <strong>of</strong> which supported the UK, and which gave the government an opportunity to<br />

display its European character: Chalfont characterised the application as<br />

‘an important and courageous task which will be crowned with success and which<br />

will bring great benefit to a Europe really united’. 84<br />

The ‘Soames affair’ therefore raised the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the British application in the<br />

Community states. More practically, the Germans provi<strong>de</strong>d the UK with an account<br />

<strong>of</strong> Debré’s first meeting with the ambassadors <strong>of</strong> the Five in Paris, <strong>de</strong>spite an appeal<br />

from the French Foreign minister for Franco-German solidarity. This fulfilment <strong>of</strong><br />

un<strong>de</strong>rtakings ma<strong>de</strong> during Wilson’s visit suggested that the Germans put increased<br />

priority on relations with Britain in the aftermath <strong>of</strong> the general’s proposals. 85<br />

Wilson was careful to reinforce that new solidarity, working to ensure that the<br />

French boycott <strong>of</strong> WEU did not un<strong>de</strong>rmine German commitment to increased<br />

consultation with Britain. He sent a personal message to Kiesinger, noting that they<br />

had agreed in Bonn that the <strong>de</strong>cision taken at Luxembourg was a ‘welcome step<br />

forward and should be encouraged’. They must not let themselves be diverted by<br />

the French actions. Wilson conclu<strong>de</strong>d with a plea.<br />

‘What is at stake now is not the interpretation <strong>of</strong> a single article in the Brussels<br />

Treaty but the continuation <strong>of</strong> the efforts, on which we have worked together for so<br />

many months, to <strong>de</strong>velop political consultation in the WEU as a step towards the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> European unity. I hope you will see this matter in terms <strong>of</strong> Anglo/<br />

German relations as well as in the context <strong>of</strong> wi<strong>de</strong>r European policy […].This is the<br />

time to build on what has so far been achieved’. 86<br />

Wilson’s letter had the <strong>de</strong>sired effect, and the Germans atten<strong>de</strong>d the next WEU<br />

meeting – in the absence <strong>of</strong> France. 87 It covered only procedural points, but the<br />

WEU assembly later passed a resolution welcoming political consultations and the<br />

Council met, again without France, on 12 March to consi<strong>de</strong>r the Nigerian civil<br />

war. 88 If it was his intention, the general’s proposals failed to distract from the real<br />

progress towards co-operation being ma<strong>de</strong> in WEU.<br />

83. See especially telegram, Luxembourg to FCO, 22 February 1969, No.69, UKNA/PREM/13/2628.<br />

84. Il Messagero, 22 February 1969, reported in telegram, Rome to FCO, 25 February 1969, No.1 Saving.<br />

For other press reports, see for example, telegrams, Brussels to FCO, No.75; Bonn to FCO, No.216;<br />

Hague to FCO, No.111; Rome to FCO, No.186, all 22 February 1969, UKNA/FCO/30/415.<br />

85. Telegram, Paris to FCO, 25 February 1969, No.209, UKNA/FCO/30/416.<br />

86. Telegram, FCO to Bonn, 21 February 1969, No.169, Prime Minister’s Personal Message Serial No<br />

T22/69, UKNA/PREM/13/2628.<br />

87. KCA23266-7 (29 March – 5 April 1969).<br />

88. Intriguingly, the French WEU <strong>de</strong>legation split over the resolution: the six Gaullist <strong>de</strong>puties voted<br />

against, the four non-Communist left-wing <strong>de</strong>puties voted for and three others abstained; letter, Marjoribanks<br />

to Robinson, 5 March 1969, UKNA/FCO/30/538; KCA23266 (29 March – 5 April 1969).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!