journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Soames Affair 75<br />
After effects<br />
The ramifications <strong>of</strong> the ‘Soames affair’ played out for the rest <strong>of</strong> the spring, and<br />
were mainly positive for Britain. The governments <strong>of</strong> the Five accepted the British<br />
account <strong>of</strong> events. 83 As people continued to <strong>de</strong>bate the rights and wrongs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
affair, British aims in Europe were plastered across European newspapers, almost<br />
all <strong>of</strong> which supported the UK, and which gave the government an opportunity to<br />
display its European character: Chalfont characterised the application as<br />
‘an important and courageous task which will be crowned with success and which<br />
will bring great benefit to a Europe really united’. 84<br />
The ‘Soames affair’ therefore raised the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the British application in the<br />
Community states. More practically, the Germans provi<strong>de</strong>d the UK with an account<br />
<strong>of</strong> Debré’s first meeting with the ambassadors <strong>of</strong> the Five in Paris, <strong>de</strong>spite an appeal<br />
from the French Foreign minister for Franco-German solidarity. This fulfilment <strong>of</strong><br />
un<strong>de</strong>rtakings ma<strong>de</strong> during Wilson’s visit suggested that the Germans put increased<br />
priority on relations with Britain in the aftermath <strong>of</strong> the general’s proposals. 85<br />
Wilson was careful to reinforce that new solidarity, working to ensure that the<br />
French boycott <strong>of</strong> WEU did not un<strong>de</strong>rmine German commitment to increased<br />
consultation with Britain. He sent a personal message to Kiesinger, noting that they<br />
had agreed in Bonn that the <strong>de</strong>cision taken at Luxembourg was a ‘welcome step<br />
forward and should be encouraged’. They must not let themselves be diverted by<br />
the French actions. Wilson conclu<strong>de</strong>d with a plea.<br />
‘What is at stake now is not the interpretation <strong>of</strong> a single article in the Brussels<br />
Treaty but the continuation <strong>of</strong> the efforts, on which we have worked together for so<br />
many months, to <strong>de</strong>velop political consultation in the WEU as a step towards the<br />
<strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> European unity. I hope you will see this matter in terms <strong>of</strong> Anglo/<br />
German relations as well as in the context <strong>of</strong> wi<strong>de</strong>r European policy […].This is the<br />
time to build on what has so far been achieved’. 86<br />
Wilson’s letter had the <strong>de</strong>sired effect, and the Germans atten<strong>de</strong>d the next WEU<br />
meeting – in the absence <strong>of</strong> France. 87 It covered only procedural points, but the<br />
WEU assembly later passed a resolution welcoming political consultations and the<br />
Council met, again without France, on 12 March to consi<strong>de</strong>r the Nigerian civil<br />
war. 88 If it was his intention, the general’s proposals failed to distract from the real<br />
progress towards co-operation being ma<strong>de</strong> in WEU.<br />
83. See especially telegram, Luxembourg to FCO, 22 February 1969, No.69, UKNA/PREM/13/2628.<br />
84. Il Messagero, 22 February 1969, reported in telegram, Rome to FCO, 25 February 1969, No.1 Saving.<br />
For other press reports, see for example, telegrams, Brussels to FCO, No.75; Bonn to FCO, No.216;<br />
Hague to FCO, No.111; Rome to FCO, No.186, all 22 February 1969, UKNA/FCO/30/415.<br />
85. Telegram, Paris to FCO, 25 February 1969, No.209, UKNA/FCO/30/416.<br />
86. Telegram, FCO to Bonn, 21 February 1969, No.169, Prime Minister’s Personal Message Serial No<br />
T22/69, UKNA/PREM/13/2628.<br />
87. KCA23266-7 (29 March – 5 April 1969).<br />
88. Intriguingly, the French WEU <strong>de</strong>legation split over the resolution: the six Gaullist <strong>de</strong>puties voted<br />
against, the four non-Communist left-wing <strong>de</strong>puties voted for and three others abstained; letter, Marjoribanks<br />
to Robinson, 5 March 1969, UKNA/FCO/30/538; KCA23266 (29 March – 5 April 1969).