13.04.2015 Views

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Our Man in Paris 53<br />

the best the German Government could do in the circumstances and Britain should<br />

realise this”. 48<br />

Getting more and more uneasy about Brown’s fundamental miscalculation <strong>of</strong><br />

counting on the Five, Reilly now openly warned <strong>of</strong> the likelihood <strong>of</strong> a French veto.<br />

In March 1967 he wrote to the Foreign Office:<br />

“Everything he [<strong>de</strong> Gaulle] said about British entry into the EEC confirmed the view<br />

that he is <strong>de</strong>eply reluctant to accept it at the present time. It was also clear that he<br />

does not want to see an early application by H.M. Government”. 49<br />

His warnings, however, were ignored. Sensing growing domestic approval for<br />

an application, Wilson and Brown were unwilling to review their strategy.<br />

Confi<strong>de</strong>nt that support from the other EEC members would eventually overcome<br />

French opposition, Wilson told the cabinet in March that „it might well be difficult<br />

for him [<strong>de</strong> Gaulle] to veto the United Kingdom”. 50 By then, opposition in cabinet<br />

to an application had largely ero<strong>de</strong>d. Wilson had avoi<strong>de</strong>d prolonged <strong>de</strong>bate about<br />

the chances <strong>of</strong> success by drawing attention to its <strong>de</strong>tails. Barbara Castle recalls in<br />

her diary:<br />

“I thought Harold had manoeuvred brilliantly. […] He had succee<strong>de</strong>d in guiding us<br />

into a discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>de</strong>tails which is more effective than anything else in making<br />

principles look less important”. 51<br />

The cabinet merely discussed un<strong>de</strong>r what conditions Britain should join, not<br />

whether it was possible to do so.<br />

Technology and a nuclear <strong>de</strong>al? Spring 1967<br />

The formal <strong>de</strong>cision to apply for EEC membership for a second time was taken<br />

on 2 May 1967. 52 Brown had insisted that an application had to be ma<strong>de</strong> quickly to<br />

retain the support <strong>of</strong> the Five. Otherwise, he told the cabinet,<br />

“those EEC countries which most keenly supported our entry would be discouraged<br />

and the momentum generated by the tour [the probe] would be dissipated”.<br />

While he acknowledged that the attitu<strong>de</strong> <strong>of</strong> presi<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>de</strong> Gaulle was important<br />

for an application to succeed, Brown argued that „the choice <strong>of</strong> the right tactics<br />

should help us neutralise French opposition”. 53<br />

De Gaulle respon<strong>de</strong>d on 16 May at a press conference in Paris, <strong>de</strong>claring his<br />

opposition to British entry into the Common Market. The UK, he said, „is not a<br />

continental country”. British accession would tear the EEC apart:<br />

48. UKNA: FO800/982, record <strong>of</strong> meeting, 16 February 1967, 10 a.m.<br />

49. UKNA: PREM13/1478, Reilly to FO, 21 March 1967.<br />

50. UNKA: CAB 128, CC (67) 14, Cabinet meeting 21 March 1967.<br />

51. B. CASTLE, op.cit., p.236.<br />

52. UNKA: CAB 128, CC (67) 27, Cabinet meeting 2 May 1967.<br />

53. UNKA: CAB 128, CC (67) 26, Cabinet meeting 30 April 1967, 2.45 p.m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!