journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Our Man in Paris 53<br />
the best the German Government could do in the circumstances and Britain should<br />
realise this”. 48<br />
Getting more and more uneasy about Brown’s fundamental miscalculation <strong>of</strong><br />
counting on the Five, Reilly now openly warned <strong>of</strong> the likelihood <strong>of</strong> a French veto.<br />
In March 1967 he wrote to the Foreign Office:<br />
“Everything he [<strong>de</strong> Gaulle] said about British entry into the EEC confirmed the view<br />
that he is <strong>de</strong>eply reluctant to accept it at the present time. It was also clear that he<br />
does not want to see an early application by H.M. Government”. 49<br />
His warnings, however, were ignored. Sensing growing domestic approval for<br />
an application, Wilson and Brown were unwilling to review their strategy.<br />
Confi<strong>de</strong>nt that support from the other EEC members would eventually overcome<br />
French opposition, Wilson told the cabinet in March that „it might well be difficult<br />
for him [<strong>de</strong> Gaulle] to veto the United Kingdom”. 50 By then, opposition in cabinet<br />
to an application had largely ero<strong>de</strong>d. Wilson had avoi<strong>de</strong>d prolonged <strong>de</strong>bate about<br />
the chances <strong>of</strong> success by drawing attention to its <strong>de</strong>tails. Barbara Castle recalls in<br />
her diary:<br />
“I thought Harold had manoeuvred brilliantly. […] He had succee<strong>de</strong>d in guiding us<br />
into a discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>de</strong>tails which is more effective than anything else in making<br />
principles look less important”. 51<br />
The cabinet merely discussed un<strong>de</strong>r what conditions Britain should join, not<br />
whether it was possible to do so.<br />
Technology and a nuclear <strong>de</strong>al? Spring 1967<br />
The formal <strong>de</strong>cision to apply for EEC membership for a second time was taken<br />
on 2 May 1967. 52 Brown had insisted that an application had to be ma<strong>de</strong> quickly to<br />
retain the support <strong>of</strong> the Five. Otherwise, he told the cabinet,<br />
“those EEC countries which most keenly supported our entry would be discouraged<br />
and the momentum generated by the tour [the probe] would be dissipated”.<br />
While he acknowledged that the attitu<strong>de</strong> <strong>of</strong> presi<strong>de</strong>nt <strong>de</strong> Gaulle was important<br />
for an application to succeed, Brown argued that „the choice <strong>of</strong> the right tactics<br />
should help us neutralise French opposition”. 53<br />
De Gaulle respon<strong>de</strong>d on 16 May at a press conference in Paris, <strong>de</strong>claring his<br />
opposition to British entry into the Common Market. The UK, he said, „is not a<br />
continental country”. British accession would tear the EEC apart:<br />
48. UKNA: FO800/982, record <strong>of</strong> meeting, 16 February 1967, 10 a.m.<br />
49. UKNA: PREM13/1478, Reilly to FO, 21 March 1967.<br />
50. UNKA: CAB 128, CC (67) 14, Cabinet meeting 21 March 1967.<br />
51. B. CASTLE, op.cit., p.236.<br />
52. UNKA: CAB 128, CC (67) 27, Cabinet meeting 2 May 1967.<br />
53. UNKA: CAB 128, CC (67) 26, Cabinet meeting 30 April 1967, 2.45 p.m.