13.04.2015 Views

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138<br />

Book reviews – Comptes rendus – Buchbesprechungen<br />

High Authority are concerned, there could be no doubt that “du fait du caractère<br />

supranational <strong>de</strong> la Communauté et <strong>de</strong> la souveraineté propre déléguée à celle-ci, ses<br />

relations extérieures sont analogues à celles d’un Etat” (p.19), as J. van Helmont stated in<br />

October 1952. But were both member and non-member countries really willing to accept<br />

such a role?<br />

Due to her “supranational” approach, Becker-Döring used as primary sources “only”<br />

records from the archives <strong>of</strong> the High Authority <strong>of</strong> the ECSC, or rather from the micr<strong>of</strong>iche<br />

edition. In addition, she went through lots <strong>of</strong> published documents and the important<br />

publications on the ECSC, including not only historical but also legal works. Yet, although it<br />

may be justified by various reasons to concentrate the archival research on the ECSC, this<br />

<strong>de</strong>cision might have repercussions on the assessment <strong>of</strong> the responses <strong>of</strong> member<br />

governments to the High Authority’s foreign policy ambitions and activities.<br />

The book is divi<strong>de</strong>d into three parts. The first and shortest <strong>de</strong>als with the administrative<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the ECSC, especially with those related to foreign policy issues. Becker-Döring<br />

distinguishes between three stages: the first one, 1952-1954, was characterized by Jean<br />

Monnet’s i<strong>de</strong>as <strong>of</strong> administration and his foreign policy activities vis-à-vis the United<br />

Kingdom and the United States <strong>of</strong> America. The second, 1954-1958, was characterized by<br />

the bureaucratization <strong>of</strong> the administration and, therefore, by an increase <strong>of</strong> its activities:<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the ECSC’s agreements fell into this period. The third stage, 1958-1960, showed a<br />

stepping up <strong>of</strong> efforts to cooperate with the European Economic Community (EEC) and the<br />

European Atomic Energy Community and a gradual <strong>de</strong>cline <strong>of</strong> the ECSC’s foreign policy<br />

importance in favour <strong>of</strong> “Brussels”. The second chapter <strong>of</strong> the book analyses the High<br />

Authority’s diplomatic relations and instruments, whereas the last part <strong>de</strong>als with the<br />

contractual agreements between the High Authority and non-member countries, including<br />

an extensive case study <strong>of</strong> the association agreement with the United Kingdom. Although<br />

the importance <strong>of</strong> the ECSC’s foreign relations diminished after the Treaties <strong>of</strong> Rome, its<br />

experience served as a mo<strong>de</strong>l for the foreign policy activities especially <strong>of</strong> the EEC.<br />

Becker-Döring’s book is a valuable contribution to our un<strong>de</strong>rstanding <strong>of</strong> the origins <strong>of</strong> a<br />

“European” foreign policy. Her answer to the question in the title is clear: Yes, there was a<br />

foreign policy <strong>of</strong> the ECSC, although the member countries tried – more or less successfully<br />

– to limit its ambitions. Perhaps Becker-Döring should have tried to give a precise <strong>de</strong>finition<br />

<strong>of</strong> her un<strong>de</strong>rstanding <strong>of</strong> the term “foreign policy”. It seems, that the High Authority’s<br />

“foreign policy” was rather “technical”. But maybe that is typical <strong>of</strong> a supranational body<br />

like the ECSC.<br />

Priv.Doz. Dr. Werner Bührer<br />

Technische Universität München

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!