12.04.2015 Views

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction 7<br />

such as the attempt to create a European Defence Community and for the more successful<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rtakings such as the Schuman plan and the negotiation <strong>of</strong> the Treaties<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rome. The traditional focus on the 1950’s and on the incentives – and the lack<br />

there<strong>of</strong> – in the nation states to engage in the <strong>integration</strong> process is well justified.<br />

The time <strong>of</strong> birth <strong>of</strong> the European Community undoubtedly is the crux for un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />

why nation states have engaged in ceding sovereignty to the supranational<br />

community and what was the original ‘contract’ <strong>of</strong> the <strong>integration</strong> process. Examining<br />

why the Six set sails for the <strong>integration</strong> process that en<strong>de</strong>d with the EU – and<br />

why others did not (at that point <strong>of</strong> time at least) – is still an important subject for<br />

researchers. Two <strong>of</strong> the contributions to this issue are analyzing these problems in a<br />

country where dynamics and reluctance at one and the same time seem to have<br />

been most manifest. Seung-Ryeol Kim’s article on France’s Agony between «Vocation<br />

Européenne et Mondiale»: The Union Française as an Obstacle in the French<br />

Policy <strong>of</strong> Supranational European Integration, 1952-1954 is a study <strong>of</strong> France’s attempts<br />

to reconcile her priorities in the European policy with her world power status.<br />

European consi<strong>de</strong>rations – especially in relation to Germany – brought the<br />

French political lea<strong>de</strong>rship to engage first in the green pool negotiations and later in<br />

the attempt to establish a European Army with a European Political Community as<br />

a ‘ro<strong>of</strong> organization’. It was, however, difficult to reconcile these policies with the<br />

preservation <strong>of</strong> France’s world power role in which the Union Française was the<br />

main pillar. Thus, Seung-Reyol Kim shows how the concern for the endangered<br />

system <strong>of</strong> <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ncy between France and her earlier colonies contributed to the<br />

French rejection <strong>of</strong> the green pool and to the failure to ratify the EDC treaty. While<br />

Seung-Reyol Kim’s article focusses on the overseas aspect <strong>of</strong> French European<br />

policy, Lise Rye Svartvatn’s In Quest <strong>of</strong> Time, Protection and Approval: France<br />

and the Claims for Social Harmonisation in the European Economic Community,<br />

1955-56 turns the attention to the French domestic political consi<strong>de</strong>rations during<br />

the negotiations on the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome. Lise Rye Svartvatn’s work shows how<br />

France’s social policy pursued at European level inten<strong>de</strong>d to achieve the domestic<br />

aims <strong>of</strong> securing a continued expansion and mo<strong>de</strong>rnisation <strong>of</strong> French industry. In itself<br />

a reflection <strong>of</strong> temporal problems and domestic, political disunity on the question<br />

<strong>of</strong> European <strong>integration</strong>, the line pursued by France had nevertheless longterm effects<br />

on the institutional and policy-oriented compromises in the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome.<br />

Still, however important this original compromise on the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome was,<br />

the functions and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the European Communities met with changes in the<br />

face <strong>of</strong> challenges from outsi<strong>de</strong> forces. Even though the <strong>integration</strong> process initiated<br />

by the Six was progressively to become the heart <strong>of</strong> the <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> European<br />

institution-building and co-operation, it should be remembered that the Six did<br />

not have the monopoly in European <strong>integration</strong> and co-operation in the 1950’s and<br />

1960’s. Till now the relationship between those insi<strong>de</strong> the union and those outsi<strong>de</strong><br />

(or waiting to join) has been one <strong>of</strong> the most critical factors <strong>of</strong> the <strong>history</strong> <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

community. This was so already with the divi<strong>de</strong> between the Anglo-Scandinavian<br />

functionalists and the Continental fe<strong>de</strong>ralists at the time <strong>of</strong> the foundation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Council <strong>of</strong> Europe in 1949, the break-up <strong>of</strong> the OEEC in 1958-59 and the Euro-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!