12.04.2015 Views

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Labour Party's Changing Relationship to Europe 123<br />

asked: “Is the Schuman Plan a <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> workers' control <strong>of</strong> the basic industries<br />

<strong>of</strong> Europe, or is it a <strong>de</strong>velopment <strong>of</strong> capitalist control and cartel agreements<br />

which have always been <strong>de</strong>trimental to the working class”? 10 A representative from<br />

a regional Labour party <strong>de</strong>clared that “without public ownership and a policy <strong>of</strong><br />

full employment, the unification <strong>of</strong> European heavy industry will inevitably lead to<br />

a restrictive monopoly, the <strong>de</strong>struction <strong>of</strong> full employment and <strong>of</strong> the workers'<br />

standards <strong>of</strong> living”. 11<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> Parliament also spoke out against joining the ECSC, focusing on<br />

the dangers <strong>of</strong> the supranational aspect and the fears <strong>of</strong> a European body usurping<br />

the Government's right to plan and direct the British economy. In 1952, while in<br />

Opposition, Labour remained faithful to the values it had espoused when in <strong>of</strong>fice.<br />

12 The Rt. Hon. Hugh Dalton clarified:<br />

“There are some who propagate the notion <strong>of</strong> a fe<strong>de</strong>ral Europe <strong>of</strong> which Britain<br />

should be a member. The Labour Party, almost unanimously, has rejected that view.<br />

We are not prepared to join a European fe<strong>de</strong>ration because we are not prepared to<br />

hand over to a supra-national authority <strong>de</strong>cisions on matters which we judge vital to<br />

our national life; such matters as the scope <strong>of</strong> socialisation, the means <strong>of</strong> maintaining<br />

full employment or the distribution <strong>of</strong> wealth through the policy <strong>of</strong> fair shares”. 13<br />

In 1955, the Conservative Government was invited to participate in the furthering<br />

<strong>of</strong> European <strong>integration</strong> at the Messina Conference. The negotiations led to the<br />

Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome, which served as the founding document for the European Economic<br />

Community (EEC). The Preamble resolved to ensure the economic and social<br />

progress <strong>of</strong> signatory countries, though the articles mainly focused on the complex<br />

<strong>de</strong>tails nee<strong>de</strong>d for economic <strong>integration</strong>. 14 The countries that elected to accept<br />

the Treaty became known as the ‘Six’– France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg<br />

and the Netherlands. Britain, un<strong>de</strong>r the Conservatives, sent a <strong>de</strong>legation to<br />

observe, but as in the case <strong>of</strong> the ECSC, <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d to remain alo<strong>of</strong>. In response, Britain<br />

rallied the other European nations who were not involved in the Treaty <strong>of</strong><br />

Rome, to join a European Free Tra<strong>de</strong> Area (EFTA). EFTA would not push for <strong>de</strong>eper<br />

<strong>integration</strong> but would allow member countries to benefit from reduced or eliminated<br />

tariff and non-tariff tra<strong>de</strong> barriers.<br />

The Labourite Shirley Williams advocated in 1958 that EFTA countries should<br />

agree on certain measures <strong>of</strong> ‘social harmonisation’ that were already in place within<br />

the EEC – in or<strong>de</strong>r to bring the two organisations closer together. Although the majority<br />

10. Ibid., p.84. It is interesting to note that at this time, because <strong>of</strong> the strong unity <strong>of</strong> the Party, the<br />

Labour Government is thought to clearly represent the views <strong>of</strong> the Party - this attitu<strong>de</strong> and assurance<br />

did not continue into the 1960s.<br />

11. Ibid., p.164.<br />

12. The Conservatives, led by Winston Churchill, won the 1951 campaign, with 321 seats to 295. Party<br />

positions on the Schuman Plan did not figure into the election, as both parties were against joining.<br />

13. 51st Annual Conference <strong>of</strong> the Labour Party, (Morecambe, 1952), p.113.<br />

14. A section on Social Policy was inclu<strong>de</strong>d, as was the creation <strong>of</strong> a European Social Fund; however,<br />

concrete action was mainly restricted to ‘making studies, <strong>de</strong>livering opinions and arranging consultations.’<br />

(Part 3, Title III, Article 118, Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome) At this time, Labour was still convinced<br />

it could achieve its social aims through national planning.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!