journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
An Elusive Partnership: Europe, Economic Co-operation and British Policy 119<br />
In Uniscan policy-makers found a useful forum to discuss long-term strategies<br />
and negotiation positions. Being a multilateral forum it brought the policy-making<br />
machineries together in a manner that would not have been possible using normal<br />
diplomatic channels. This, and the numerous studies conducted over the years for<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> Uniscan meetings on the national economies and Anglo-Scandinavian<br />
economic interaction, eventually paved the way for EFTA – when external conditions<br />
so permitted – and provi<strong>de</strong>d that loose association with an institutional memory<br />
concerning expectations the core members had over the potential and ramifications<br />
<strong>of</strong> co-operation amongst them, and the behaviour and policy-making<br />
processes typical on both si<strong>de</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the North Sea.<br />
Despite consi<strong>de</strong>rable political goodwill behind the scheme, the economic<br />
achievements <strong>of</strong> Uniscan fell far short <strong>of</strong> the original British proposals <strong>of</strong> November-December<br />
1949, when a more comprehensive financial liberalisation had been<br />
envisaged. Had this approach been successful, the pound sterling would have become<br />
convertible within this group which would have directly strengthened the<br />
economic influence <strong>of</strong> Britain in Scandinavia, whose situation would then have<br />
resembled that <strong>of</strong> the sterling area countries.<br />
The utility <strong>of</strong> Anglo-Scandinavian discussions in Uniscan, were therefore <strong>of</strong><br />
technical and to a lesser extent, <strong>of</strong> political nature. While the ultimate ramifications<br />
Uniscan co-operation was subjected to was acknowledged early on, it was nevertheless<br />
kept alive. Within its limits, it provi<strong>de</strong>d a forum for consultations, discussions<br />
and exchanges <strong>of</strong> view, and occasionally, a place where disagreements could<br />
be <strong>de</strong>alt with “on the domestic plane”, as the British <strong>de</strong>scribed it. More than anything<br />
else, the <strong>history</strong> <strong>of</strong> its establishment in 1949-51, illuminates the complex set<br />
<strong>of</strong> perceptions and misperceptions, hopes, fears and different national policy goals<br />
the British and Scandinavian governments had during a key period in European <strong>integration</strong><br />
<strong>history</strong>.