journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
118<br />
Juhana Aunesluoma<br />
The tra<strong>de</strong> disputes <strong>of</strong> 1952 and the abortive E<strong>de</strong>n plan were both signs that the<br />
Anglo-Scandinavian relationship had after all become more strained when compared<br />
to the Labour government's period in <strong>of</strong>fice in 1945-51. Thus in summer<br />
1952, while acute disagreements between Britain and Scandinavia in tra<strong>de</strong> issues<br />
were patched up, posts in Scandinavia were increasingly apprehensive about the future<br />
prospects <strong>of</strong> Anglo-Scandinavian economic co-operation, as this time problems<br />
seemed to originate from London and not from Stockholm or Copenhagen. 53<br />
While on the tra<strong>de</strong> si<strong>de</strong> the British were steadily losing ground to West Germany,<br />
on the economic-political front even the Norwegians had become more reserved<br />
towards Britain than they had been in the beginning <strong>of</strong> Uniscan co-operation in late<br />
1949. There was a growing realisation <strong>of</strong> economic changes, which were working<br />
against, not for, further Anglo-Scandinavian economic co-operation. The last occasion<br />
when plans for <strong>de</strong>epening economic relations between these countries were<br />
discussed was in 1953-55, when un<strong>de</strong>r the initiative <strong>of</strong> the Treasury and the Bank<br />
<strong>of</strong> England, feasibility <strong>of</strong> Scandinavia's full Sterling area membership, and even<br />
participation in the British Commonwealth, was studied and abandoned in face <strong>of</strong><br />
Swedish and Danish opposition. This time these i<strong>de</strong>as met with even less enthusiasm<br />
on the behalf <strong>of</strong> the Swe<strong>de</strong>s and Danes than the Uniscan proposals had in<br />
1949, although the Norwegian response was at first positive. 54 Again in 1957-58,<br />
when the British government's Free Tra<strong>de</strong> Area proposal was discussed, the prospects<br />
for any special Anglo-Scandinavian economic arrangements alongsi<strong>de</strong> the<br />
wi<strong>de</strong>r schemes were very low. After the shelving <strong>of</strong> the Sterling area proposals in<br />
1955, no substantial openings for further co-operation within this group were introduced<br />
until 1959.<br />
Conclusion<br />
While <strong>of</strong>ficials at the Board <strong>of</strong> Tra<strong>de</strong> and the Foreign Office tried to counter the<br />
overall trend <strong>of</strong> growing distance between the governments on international economic<br />
policy in the early 1950s, Uniscan's meetings nonetheless continued apace<br />
and remained a part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ficial machinery <strong>of</strong> managing Britain's relations with<br />
the Scandinavians and vice versa. The biannual meetings <strong>of</strong> Uniscan lasted until<br />
1959, when the Swedish government initiated – during what proved to be Uniscan's<br />
last meeting – the negotiations that led to the signature <strong>of</strong> the Stockholm Convention<br />
in November 1959 and the formation <strong>of</strong> EFTA. The arrangement was formally<br />
en<strong>de</strong>d in 1960.<br />
53. Wright to E<strong>de</strong>n, 18 June 1952, FO 371/99082, PRO.<br />
54. Brittain minute, 29 February 1953, T 236/5375, PRO; Bank <strong>of</strong> England memorandum, 'Uniscan<br />
and convertibility', 15 April 1953, OV 29/32, BEA; H. Eggers minute, 5 May 1953; Treasury<br />
memorandum, 'Scandinavia and the Sterling Area', 16.May 1953; Berthoud to Coulson, 17 June<br />
1953, T 236/5375, PRO; K. E. ERIKSEN and H. Ø. PHARO, Kald krig <strong>of</strong> internasjonalisering …,<br />
op.cit., pp.144-145.