12.04.2015 Views

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Bomb and Europe 67<br />

I<br />

Only after <strong>de</strong> Gaulle's rejection of the British plan for a Free Tra<strong>de</strong> Area in December<br />

1958 did the government in London begin to appreciate the full significance of<br />

the evolving bilateral alliance b<strong>et</strong>ween Paris and Bonn for any future attempt to<br />

secure British economic and political interests in Western Europe. When Macmillan<br />

first started to think about a possible solution to the problem of the economic<br />

split of Western Europe into Sixes (EEC) and Sevens (European Free Tra<strong>de</strong><br />

Association – EFTA) at the end of 1959 he wrote to his Foreign Secr<strong>et</strong>ary Lloyd<br />

that it was the governments of these two countries that had to be influenced in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to reach an economic s<strong>et</strong>tlement b<strong>et</strong>ween the two groups, which at that stage was<br />

still British policy. 7 Of the two, because of the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Republic's generally weak<br />

strategic position in connection with the latent Berlin crisis, the Bonn government<br />

was consi<strong>de</strong>red to be in a weak position politically. Macmillan thus believed that<br />

A<strong>de</strong>nauer could probably be forced to support British policy over Europe by<br />

applying pressure which would range from hinting at the possibility of further<br />

sharp cuts in the strength of the British Army on the Rhine (BAOR) to threatening<br />

that Britain might even <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> to leave NATO if the continental Europeans "<strong>de</strong>clared<br />

economic war upon her". 8<br />

However ill-conceived this policy may have been, <strong>de</strong> Gaulle's v<strong>et</strong>o against the<br />

creation of a Free Tra<strong>de</strong> Area the year before had illustrated that the key to a<br />

satisfactory s<strong>et</strong>tlement in Europe lay in Paris. 9 Macmillan and the Foreign Office<br />

rightly thought that contrary to A<strong>de</strong>nauer, <strong>de</strong> Gaulle would be able to negotiate<br />

from a position of strength, and that essentially for three reasons. Firstly, his domestic<br />

political position was consi<strong>de</strong>red to be increasingly secure. In 1958 France had<br />

appeared to be on the brink of civil war. Despite the explosive Algerian question,<br />

which was only resolved in 1962 with the Evian agreement, the Fifth Republic now<br />

already enjoyed a comparatively high <strong>de</strong>gree of internal stability following the<br />

introduction of the new constitution in October 1958. This in turn allowed the ever<br />

more self-assertive <strong>de</strong> Gaulle to shift his attention to foreign policy issues, particularly<br />

to the i<strong>de</strong>a of a reorganisation of the Atlantic Alliance, which he began to<br />

<strong>de</strong>velop with his 1958 memorandum on tripartism, and to the establishment of political<br />

cooperation among the Six, whose foreign ministers began to me<strong>et</strong> regularly<br />

at the end of 1959. On both issues, the British government was in a very awkward<br />

position, as it expected to lose much of its own influence both in Europe as well as<br />

vis-à-vis the United States as a result of any change in the status quo.<br />

Secondly, by 1959 France had experienced several years of comparatively<br />

strong economic expansion. The introduction of full convertibility of the Franc at<br />

the end of 1958 signalled that the internal economic mo<strong>de</strong>rnization was progres-<br />

7. Macmillan to Lloyd: PRO PREM 11/2679 (22 October 1959).<br />

8. PRO PREM 11/2328 (8 October 1958). For the evolution of British policy towards the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral<br />

Republic see W. KAISER, "Wie nach Austerlitz? London-Bonn-Paris und die britische EWG-Politik<br />

bis 1961", in: Integration 16/1 (1993), pp. 19-32 (26-27).<br />

9. Macmillan to Lloyd: PRO PREM 11/2679 (22 October 1959); Macmillan to Queen Elisab<strong>et</strong>h (23<br />

December 1959), quoted in Horne, Macmillan II,p. 222.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!