12.04.2015 Views

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dieses Dokument wur<strong>de</strong> erstellt mit FrameMaker 4.0.4.<br />

The Western European Union Armaments Pool 37<br />

The Western European Union Armaments Pool: France’s Quest<br />

for Security and European Cooperation in Transition<br />

1951-1955<br />

Elena Calandri<br />

Looking back to the European Defence Community – The Crisis in Context<br />

In May 1950, partly as a response to American pressures to end obstruction of West<br />

Germany's full industrial recovery and political rehabilitation, the French foreign<br />

minister <strong>Robert</strong> Schuman launched a plan to pool production and <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />

the essential strategic materials and s<strong>et</strong> the goal of European political union, to be<br />

built up gradually "par <strong>de</strong>s réalisations concrètes créant une solidarité <strong>de</strong> fait". In<br />

September 1950, <strong>de</strong>spite rapid progress, the Schuman Plan negotiators had only<br />

started to sk<strong>et</strong>ch a framework for Franco-German reconciliation so America's<br />

uncompromising pressure to have West Germany contributing to Western <strong>de</strong>fence<br />

disrupted the tempo of the process. Isolated among his colleagues, who were afraid<br />

of fomenting American disengagement from Europe at the New York NATO Council<br />

me<strong>et</strong>ing, the French government's representative rejected German membership<br />

of the North Atlantic Pact, arguing that this did not offer any means of limiting and<br />

controlling rearmament. The French Premier, René Pleven, put forward therefore a<br />

supranational solution worked out by Jean Monn<strong>et</strong>. In January, 1951, representatives<br />

of the Six opened negotiations in Paris to create a "European army". 1<br />

As negotiations went ahead, the plan started a chain reaction which transformed<br />

the distant, almost visionary, European union into an entangling, imminent reality.<br />

In the autumn of 1951 the Benelux and Italy called for a political roof over an economic<br />

framework to complement the common army. After the Six had signed the<br />

European Defence Community (EDC) Treaty on 27 May 1952 the ad hoc assembly,<br />

formed un<strong>de</strong>r the terms of Article 38, elaborated upon the rules for the European<br />

Political Community. Plans for "pools" in such varied fields as transport and<br />

milk products proliferated. By the end of 1953, rumours were spreading about the<br />

establishment of a common mark<strong>et</strong> within six years. 2<br />

In France, initial mixed feelings towards the Pleven Plan turned into hostility<br />

concerning the Defence Community. Not only did it become clear that France<br />

could only exact controls over Germany at the price of un<strong>de</strong>rcutting her own autonomy<br />

but in March, 1953, Stalin's <strong>de</strong>ath <strong>de</strong>fused the fear and urgency that had been<br />

so effective in pushing tog<strong>et</strong>her "the West" in the aftermath of the Korean war.<br />

1. E. FURSDON, The European Defence Community. A History, London 1980; for consi<strong>de</strong>rations on<br />

the origins of the plan and on acceleration as the main cause of the failure, J. MONNET, Mémoires,<br />

Paris 1976.<br />

2. Among them, Pierre Pflimlim's "Green" pool, the so called White Pool, Malagodi's transport Pool;<br />

on the EPC and its economic spill-over, Archives du ministère <strong>de</strong>s Affaires étrangères, Paris<br />

(AMAE), DECE 1944-60, vols 582 and 584.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!