number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...
number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...
number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24<br />
John Gillingham<br />
Y<strong>et</strong> the Atlanticists remained for the most part outsi<strong>de</strong>rs and the Monn<strong>et</strong>ists<br />
dominated the European agenda. The Schuman Plan, along with the Coal and Steel<br />
Community, was their baby: It had to be protected, alternatives to it discouraged,<br />
and its legacy built upon. Monn<strong>et</strong>'s disciples in the foreign policy community like<br />
David Bruce, William Tomlinson, and <strong>Robert</strong> Bowie were not only vigorous advocates<br />
of the European Defence Community and EURATOM, both brain-children of<br />
the master: they managed to create an air of mystique around his work that elevated<br />
it above critical scrutiny. The message seldom varied: Monn<strong>et</strong> was indispensable<br />
and he alone had the necessary vision and experience to end the historic antagonism<br />
b<strong>et</strong>ween France and Germany, integrate Europe, and protect the free world from<br />
communist subversion. The United States, it followed, would be <strong>de</strong>linquent in<br />
<strong>de</strong>nying him the wherewithal to do the job. Cost was irrelevant, given the stakes,<br />
and support had to be constant and unstinting. Monn<strong>et</strong>'s projects were, however,<br />
unrealistic; the institutions he inspired were all practical failures. They did, however,<br />
result in a fast and furious wheel-spinning.<br />
The State Department Monn<strong>et</strong>ists did not, however, crowd out the pursuit of<br />
b<strong>et</strong>ter alternatives. The Atlanticist approach, which would have resulted in a thoroughgoing<br />
militarization, was surely worse than theirs and no other more coherent<br />
American <strong>de</strong>sign for Europe was in the offing. Nor was one really necessary. American-ai<strong>de</strong>d<br />
recovery, along with profound war-induced changes within European<br />
soci<strong>et</strong>y, was the prime mover of the integration process, which had its own dynamics;<br />
and the American Monn<strong>et</strong>ists could do little to influence either it nor the fundamental<br />
policy <strong>de</strong>cisions of the individual European nations. At worst, Monn<strong>et</strong>'s<br />
American friends can be accused of squan<strong>de</strong>ring resources that might have been<br />
used b<strong>et</strong>ter at home. Rare in<strong>de</strong>ed, however was the critic who ma<strong>de</strong> this point. The<br />
Monn<strong>et</strong>ists operated with the blessing of the Administration, especially after 1953,<br />
and their opponents had little fight in them. A mood of national complacency increasingly<br />
clou<strong>de</strong>d over the Eisenhower years. The Pax Americana, at least in Europe,<br />
seemed assured. Philosophers of the Affluent Soci<strong>et</strong>y maintained that domestic<br />
problems were all but non-existent. The State Department Monn<strong>et</strong>ists were hardly<br />
alone in failing to recognize that with the end of the Dollar Gap and the r<strong>et</strong>urn to<br />
convertability on the one hand and the creation of the European Community on the<br />
other, the era of America's European hegemony was, by 1958, rapidly drawing to a<br />
close.<br />
The Coal and Steel Community<br />
American policy towards the CSC must be placed against a broa<strong>de</strong>r background of<br />
Monn<strong>et</strong>'s i<strong>de</strong>as and their influence on American policy. Of his three main initiatives,<br />
only the heavy industry pool was of lasting importance. The European<br />
Defence Community, though the most ambitious and potentially significant, never<br />
materialized. EURATOM came into being but was soon eclipsed by the EC and<br />
had little more than a statutory existence. The CSC was an operational institution