12.04.2015 Views

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24<br />

John Gillingham<br />

Y<strong>et</strong> the Atlanticists remained for the most part outsi<strong>de</strong>rs and the Monn<strong>et</strong>ists<br />

dominated the European agenda. The Schuman Plan, along with the Coal and Steel<br />

Community, was their baby: It had to be protected, alternatives to it discouraged,<br />

and its legacy built upon. Monn<strong>et</strong>'s disciples in the foreign policy community like<br />

David Bruce, William Tomlinson, and <strong>Robert</strong> Bowie were not only vigorous advocates<br />

of the European Defence Community and EURATOM, both brain-children of<br />

the master: they managed to create an air of mystique around his work that elevated<br />

it above critical scrutiny. The message seldom varied: Monn<strong>et</strong> was indispensable<br />

and he alone had the necessary vision and experience to end the historic antagonism<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ween France and Germany, integrate Europe, and protect the free world from<br />

communist subversion. The United States, it followed, would be <strong>de</strong>linquent in<br />

<strong>de</strong>nying him the wherewithal to do the job. Cost was irrelevant, given the stakes,<br />

and support had to be constant and unstinting. Monn<strong>et</strong>'s projects were, however,<br />

unrealistic; the institutions he inspired were all practical failures. They did, however,<br />

result in a fast and furious wheel-spinning.<br />

The State Department Monn<strong>et</strong>ists did not, however, crowd out the pursuit of<br />

b<strong>et</strong>ter alternatives. The Atlanticist approach, which would have resulted in a thoroughgoing<br />

militarization, was surely worse than theirs and no other more coherent<br />

American <strong>de</strong>sign for Europe was in the offing. Nor was one really necessary. American-ai<strong>de</strong>d<br />

recovery, along with profound war-induced changes within European<br />

soci<strong>et</strong>y, was the prime mover of the integration process, which had its own dynamics;<br />

and the American Monn<strong>et</strong>ists could do little to influence either it nor the fundamental<br />

policy <strong>de</strong>cisions of the individual European nations. At worst, Monn<strong>et</strong>'s<br />

American friends can be accused of squan<strong>de</strong>ring resources that might have been<br />

used b<strong>et</strong>ter at home. Rare in<strong>de</strong>ed, however was the critic who ma<strong>de</strong> this point. The<br />

Monn<strong>et</strong>ists operated with the blessing of the Administration, especially after 1953,<br />

and their opponents had little fight in them. A mood of national complacency increasingly<br />

clou<strong>de</strong>d over the Eisenhower years. The Pax Americana, at least in Europe,<br />

seemed assured. Philosophers of the Affluent Soci<strong>et</strong>y maintained that domestic<br />

problems were all but non-existent. The State Department Monn<strong>et</strong>ists were hardly<br />

alone in failing to recognize that with the end of the Dollar Gap and the r<strong>et</strong>urn to<br />

convertability on the one hand and the creation of the European Community on the<br />

other, the era of America's European hegemony was, by 1958, rapidly drawing to a<br />

close.<br />

The Coal and Steel Community<br />

American policy towards the CSC must be placed against a broa<strong>de</strong>r background of<br />

Monn<strong>et</strong>'s i<strong>de</strong>as and their influence on American policy. Of his three main initiatives,<br />

only the heavy industry pool was of lasting importance. The European<br />

Defence Community, though the most ambitious and potentially significant, never<br />

materialized. EURATOM came into being but was soon eclipsed by the EC and<br />

had little more than a statutory existence. The CSC was an operational institution

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!