12.04.2015 Views

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dieses Dokument wur<strong>de</strong> erstellt mit FrameMaker 4.0.4.<br />

The Court of Justice and its Role as a driving Force in European Integration 111<br />

The Beginnings of the Court of Justice and its Role<br />

as a driving Force in European Integration<br />

Christian Pennera (*)<br />

To date, the Court of Justice of the European Communities has <strong>de</strong>livered nearly<br />

four thousand judgments. The entire collection of the Court's case-law occupies a<br />

shelf space of nearly six linear m<strong>et</strong>res in the specialist libraries 1 .<br />

As an administrative jurisdiction and then a constitutional one for the Communities<br />

but also the supreme instance for all the national courts in their implementation<br />

of Community law, the Court of Justice has shown itself to be, over the years,<br />

a powerful driving force for European integration. The informed observer will see<br />

this discre<strong>et</strong> seat of jurisdiction as in fact the most powerful of the Community<br />

institutions whose firm d<strong>et</strong>ermination to ensure that the treaties are implemented,<br />

wh<strong>et</strong>her this calls forth praise or opprobrium, has done most to make the Community<br />

into a day-to-day reality.<br />

Writings, articles or commentaries on the Court of Justice and its case-law, its<br />

practice and procedure are legion. This is as good as saying that a jurist who has<br />

been steeped in Community law will not learn a great <strong>de</strong>al from perusing this<br />

article. Here and there, however, a few d<strong>et</strong>ails about how the Court came into being<br />

may perhaps catch the eye of such people.<br />

These lines are inten<strong>de</strong>d for historians, who are often put off by legal vocabulary<br />

and techniques. For their benefit the author, who is a practitioner of the law in<br />

a Community institution but who also has a grounding in scientific historical research,<br />

will try to explain how <strong>de</strong>cisive the Court's role was in the early stages of the<br />

Community's history. It has been assumed, therefore, that the general historical<br />

context may be taken as read 2 . No reference will be ma<strong>de</strong> to specialist publications<br />

unless they directly touch upon matters affecting the Court's history.<br />

Grosso modo, this article covers the period up to the mid-sixties. Among the<br />

two hundred-odd <strong>de</strong>cisions up to 1965 only those will be mentioned which, from<br />

the author's personal point of view but also in the opinion of most commentators,<br />

are of key interest.<br />

(*) The opinions expressed by the author, who is an official of the European Parliament and a former<br />

official of the Court of Justice, are strictly personal.<br />

1. Reports of Cases before the Court, Volume 1954 to 1956 and following volumes, published in each<br />

of the official languages. In certain languages there is a selective translation only for the period<br />

preceding the accessions.<br />

2. See, in particular, P. GERBET, La construction <strong>de</strong> l'Europe, Paris 1983, 500 pp; D. SPIEREN-<br />

BURG and R. POIDEVIN: Histoire <strong>de</strong> la Haute Autorité <strong>de</strong> la CECA, Brussels 1993, 920 pp.;<br />

Contributions to the Symposia of the European Community Liaison Committee of Historians:<br />

1984 (Origins of the European Integration), 1986 (The Beginnings of the Schuman-Plan), 1987<br />

(The Relaunching of Europe and the Treaties of Rome).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!