number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...
number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...
number 1 - Centre d'études et de recherches européennes Robert ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dieses Dokument wur<strong>de</strong> erstellt mit FrameMaker 4.0.4.<br />
The Court of Justice and its Role as a driving Force in European Integration 111<br />
The Beginnings of the Court of Justice and its Role<br />
as a driving Force in European Integration<br />
Christian Pennera (*)<br />
To date, the Court of Justice of the European Communities has <strong>de</strong>livered nearly<br />
four thousand judgments. The entire collection of the Court's case-law occupies a<br />
shelf space of nearly six linear m<strong>et</strong>res in the specialist libraries 1 .<br />
As an administrative jurisdiction and then a constitutional one for the Communities<br />
but also the supreme instance for all the national courts in their implementation<br />
of Community law, the Court of Justice has shown itself to be, over the years,<br />
a powerful driving force for European integration. The informed observer will see<br />
this discre<strong>et</strong> seat of jurisdiction as in fact the most powerful of the Community<br />
institutions whose firm d<strong>et</strong>ermination to ensure that the treaties are implemented,<br />
wh<strong>et</strong>her this calls forth praise or opprobrium, has done most to make the Community<br />
into a day-to-day reality.<br />
Writings, articles or commentaries on the Court of Justice and its case-law, its<br />
practice and procedure are legion. This is as good as saying that a jurist who has<br />
been steeped in Community law will not learn a great <strong>de</strong>al from perusing this<br />
article. Here and there, however, a few d<strong>et</strong>ails about how the Court came into being<br />
may perhaps catch the eye of such people.<br />
These lines are inten<strong>de</strong>d for historians, who are often put off by legal vocabulary<br />
and techniques. For their benefit the author, who is a practitioner of the law in<br />
a Community institution but who also has a grounding in scientific historical research,<br />
will try to explain how <strong>de</strong>cisive the Court's role was in the early stages of the<br />
Community's history. It has been assumed, therefore, that the general historical<br />
context may be taken as read 2 . No reference will be ma<strong>de</strong> to specialist publications<br />
unless they directly touch upon matters affecting the Court's history.<br />
Grosso modo, this article covers the period up to the mid-sixties. Among the<br />
two hundred-odd <strong>de</strong>cisions up to 1965 only those will be mentioned which, from<br />
the author's personal point of view but also in the opinion of most commentators,<br />
are of key interest.<br />
(*) The opinions expressed by the author, who is an official of the European Parliament and a former<br />
official of the Court of Justice, are strictly personal.<br />
1. Reports of Cases before the Court, Volume 1954 to 1956 and following volumes, published in each<br />
of the official languages. In certain languages there is a selective translation only for the period<br />
preceding the accessions.<br />
2. See, in particular, P. GERBET, La construction <strong>de</strong> l'Europe, Paris 1983, 500 pp; D. SPIEREN-<br />
BURG and R. POIDEVIN: Histoire <strong>de</strong> la Haute Autorité <strong>de</strong> la CECA, Brussels 1993, 920 pp.;<br />
Contributions to the Symposia of the European Community Liaison Committee of Historians:<br />
1984 (Origins of the European Integration), 1986 (The Beginnings of the Schuman-Plan), 1987<br />
(The Relaunching of Europe and the Treaties of Rome).