mariologydogmati00pohl - Carmel Apologetics
mariologydogmati00pohl - Carmel Apologetics
mariologydogmati00pohl - Carmel Apologetics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MARY THE MOTHER OF GOD 7<br />
the Galatians (IV, 4) : "When<br />
the fulness of<br />
time was come, God sent his son, made of a<br />
woman." 17<br />
If the man Jesus, "made of a<br />
woman," is the Son of God, then that "woman"<br />
must be the mother of a Divine Son, and, conse-<br />
quently, mother of God. 18<br />
b) The argument from Tradition is most ef-<br />
fectively presented by showing from the writings<br />
of the Fathers who flourished before the time of<br />
Nestorius that Nestorianism and not the Council<br />
of Ephesus was guilty of innovation.<br />
a) The primitive Christian belief in the divine mother-<br />
hood of Mary is evidenced by certain pious practices<br />
common at a time when the faithful had hardly yet<br />
begun to make their faith the subject of reflection.<br />
Such practices were: the recitation of the Apostles'<br />
Creed, which was also the early form of baptism, and the<br />
liturgical prayers employed in public worship. The<br />
Apostles' Creed professes faith in " Jesus Christ, His<br />
[God the Father's] only Son, our Lord, who was con-<br />
ceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary."<br />
This is an unequivocal assertion of two truths: (1)<br />
that the Blessed Virgin Mary is the mother of Christ,<br />
and (2) that she is really and truly the mother of God.<br />
The ancient liturgies expressly refer to her as deoroKos or<br />
Deipara. 19<br />
1 7 top vlbv avrov yevofievov 1900. Engl. tr. by Brossart, New<br />
iic yvvaiKOS' York 1913, pp. 89 sqq.<br />
18 Rom. IX, 5. The Biblical argu- 19 For the proofs of this statement<br />
is fully developed by Bishop A. ment see Renaudot, Collect. Liturg.<br />
Schaefer, Die Gottesmutter in der Orient., t. I, pp. 36, 42, 72, 112,<br />
Hl. Schrift, pp. 83 sqq., Münster 150, 507, etc., Paris 1716.