Volume 36, No. 5 - September/October 2006 Campus Law ... - IACLEA
Volume 36, No. 5 - September/October 2006 Campus Law ... - IACLEA
Volume 36, No. 5 - September/October 2006 Campus Law ... - IACLEA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Accreditation Fee for CALEA-accredited<br />
Agencies Approved<br />
By Jack Leonard, Accreditation Coordinator<br />
<strong>IACLEA</strong>’s Accreditation Commission has<br />
approved a process for institutions that<br />
wish to seek <strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation and are<br />
already accredited by the Commission on<br />
Accreditation for <strong>Law</strong> Enforcement Agencies,<br />
Inc. (CALEA). To support this initiative,<br />
the <strong>IACLEA</strong> Finance Committee has<br />
approved a new fee structure. It is expected<br />
that this plan will encourage eligible<br />
campus law enforcement agencies<br />
to seek and retain CALEA accreditation,<br />
while also achieving the “Gold Standard”<br />
of <strong>IACLEA</strong> Accreditation.<br />
During the development of the accreditation<br />
program, it was <strong>IACLEA</strong>’s intention<br />
to join the Alliance Program, offered<br />
by CALEA. By doing so, sworn campus<br />
law enforcement departments could<br />
simultaneously attain <strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation<br />
and CALEA recognition, a preliminary<br />
achievement toward full CALEA accreditation.<br />
However, while we were planning<br />
our program, CALEA instituted several<br />
restrictions governing its Alliance partners’<br />
activities. Chief among these new regulations<br />
was the prohibition against adopting<br />
anything other than their “core” standards,<br />
or those standards that address life,<br />
heath and safety issues.<br />
While the application of the core standards<br />
would have been sufficient for our<br />
sworn members to achieve recognition<br />
status with CALEA, the <strong>IACLEA</strong> Accreditation<br />
Commission felt that the <strong>IACLEA</strong> program<br />
needed to be broader and more<br />
comprehensive, particularly for those<br />
non-sworn departments that could not<br />
advance to full CALEA accreditation.<br />
<strong>IACLEA</strong> is intent on providing an accreditation<br />
program that is universally applicable.<br />
The CALEA standards selected for<br />
the <strong>IACLEA</strong> program were deemed essential<br />
to the effective and professional<br />
administration of a campus public safety<br />
agency, irrespective of its size and/or<br />
sworn status. In making those selections,<br />
the <strong>IACLEA</strong> Accreditation Commission did<br />
not want to make any distinction between<br />
a sworn and non-sworn department when<br />
assessing their conformance to “best practice”<br />
principles of organization and management.<br />
Consequently, efforts were undertaken<br />
to negotiate a modified Alliance<br />
agreement that would provide <strong>IACLEA</strong><br />
with an exemption from the restriction<br />
of using only the “core” standards.<br />
Unfortunately, we were informed that<br />
the CALEA Commission, at their July meeting<br />
in Lexington, Kentucky, rejected our<br />
proposal to modify their Alliance Program.<br />
The failure to achieve an Alliance agreement<br />
with CALEA means that our sworn<br />
members will be unable to simultaneously<br />
achieve <strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation and<br />
CALEA recognition through the same process.<br />
However, because the CALEA standards<br />
form the foundation of the <strong>IACLEA</strong><br />
program, sworn agencies may move relatively<br />
seamlessly between the complementary<br />
programs. For example, the<br />
<strong>IACLEA</strong> Accreditation Commission has<br />
recently approved a process by which<br />
CALEA-accredited agencies may acquire<br />
<strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation through “comparative<br />
compliance.”<br />
These departments would have to<br />
prove their CALEA-accredited status by<br />
submitting their most recent CALEA onsite<br />
report and a copy of the letter notifying<br />
them of their CALEA accreditation or<br />
re-accreditation. They would also have to<br />
demonstrate compliance with the <strong>IACLEA</strong>specific<br />
standards. Since the unique <strong>IACLEA</strong><br />
standards all address campus crime reporting,<br />
the Accreditation Commission has decided<br />
that the candidate agencies will<br />
forego an on-site assessment. Instead, the<br />
Accreditation Commission will rely on a<br />
review of the standard files by having the<br />
departments mail them to <strong>IACLEA</strong>. Once<br />
<strong>IACLEA</strong> confirms a department’s compliance<br />
with its standards, the agency would<br />
receive <strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation that would<br />
run concurrently with their CALEA accreditation.<br />
On the anniversary of its CALEA<br />
accreditation, the department would have<br />
to resubmit its compliance documentation<br />
and undergo another review.<br />
<strong>IACLEA</strong>’s Finance Committee has reviewed<br />
the process and approved a fee<br />
for those campus public safety agencies<br />
that seek <strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation and are<br />
already accredited by the CALEA. The fee<br />
for CALEA-accredited departments that<br />
wish to pursue <strong>IACLEA</strong> accreditation will<br />
be $450. Initially, the fee will be prorated,<br />
based on the number of years left on the<br />
agency’s CALEA accreditation (examples:<br />
one year = $150, two years = $300, three<br />
years = $450).<br />
The candidate agency will complete<br />
an application/contract, submit the required<br />
compliance documentation and<br />
remit a check in the amount of $150 for<br />
every year (or portion thereof) left on<br />
their CALEA accreditation. The <strong>IACLEA</strong><br />
Continued on page 22<br />
20 / <strong>Campus</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Enforcement Journal