General Assembly - UN Documents

A/CONF.216/PC/2
A key question is how to strengthen the institutional framework for sustainable
development at all levels.
61. Over the years, a number of institutions have been formally established to
enhance the convergence between economic, social and environmental goals. At the
global level, the principal policymaking institution is the Commission on
Sustainable Development. Among other contributions, the Commission has actively
solicited the participation of major groups in policymaking and promoted a
particular institutional form, multi-stakeholder partnerships, to implement
sustainable development. Within the United Nations, the Executive Committee on
Economic and Social Affairs has played a role in enhancing system-wide coherence
over economic and social goals. Besides this, UN-Water, UN-Energy and
UN-Oceans have been established to promote system-wide coherence in the areas of
their competence. At the regional level, the regional commissions have organized
ministerial conferences and implementation meetings. At the national level, a
number of institutional formats have emerged, including national sustainable
development councils, the process for national sustainable development strategies,
and incorporation of sustainable development goals in other processes or
institutions, including development plans, poverty reduction strategy papers and
others. At local levels, local Agenda 21 processes were developed by local
institutions and urban municipalities.
62. A major component of the discussion on institutional development has focused
on the environmental pillar. The past four decades have seen significant changes in
the nature and reach of environmental institutions, including the establishment of
UNEP in 1972 and secretariats of a growing list of environmental conventions in the
years thereafter. At the national level, the number of countries with environmental
ministries and protection agencies increased rapidly after 1972. Many urban
municipalities and local governments also established departments or agencies to
look after environmental concerns. Finally, national and international environmental
non-governmental organizations have grown dramatically in strength and size, many
business entities have created environmental departments, and many new research
and educational institutions have been established. This rate of institutional growth
is faster than in the other pillars of sustainable development, namely economic
development (in which much of the expansion and consolidation took place in the
1950s and 1960s), and the social pillar.
63. Yet, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The test of institutional efficacy
and relevance lies in the ability to demonstrate results. On this count, as indicated in
the previous sections, there are several areas of concern. In particular, the evidence
on environmental indicators continues to be below par, as does that on the
convergence between the three dimensions of sustainable development. As
mentioned, some of this inadequacy could be attributed to the inertia of the system
or the urgency of other problems, especially poverty eradication and Millennium
Development Goals. Yet, the key question is whether institutional or structural
changes could help to accelerate the achievement of the sustainable development
agenda in all three of its dimensions.
10-30256
21