09.04.2015 Views

Utility Manual for the Precision Ratio Compass - Elliott Wave ...

Utility Manual for the Precision Ratio Compass - Elliott Wave ...

Utility Manual for the Precision Ratio Compass - Elliott Wave ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series<br />

<strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong><br />

<strong>Compass</strong><br />

Workbook 7


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

WORKBOOK<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

ELLIOTT WAVE EDUCATIONAL VIDEO SERIES<br />

WORKBOOK 7<br />

UTILITY MANUAL <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> PRECISION RATIO COMPASS<br />

Copyright © 1985, 1987 and 1995<br />

by Robert R. Prechter, Jr.<br />

Printed in <strong>the</strong> United States of America<br />

First Edition: June 1985<br />

Second Edition: September 1987<br />

Third Edition: April 1995<br />

For in<strong>for</strong>mation, address <strong>the</strong> publishers:<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> International<br />

P.O. Box 1618<br />

Gainesville, Georgia 30503<br />

ISBN: 0-932750-25-7<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series<br />

10 Volume videotape set including workbooks<br />

ISBN: 0-932750-13-3<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series<br />

Tape 7 and Workbook 7:<br />

Introduction to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle<br />

NOTICE<br />

All charts are copyright © Robert R. Prechter, Jr. 1990 or have been previously<br />

copyrighted by <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> International, Robert R. Prechter, Jr., or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

entities. All rights are reserved. The material in this volume may not be reprinted<br />

or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without <strong>the</strong> written permission of <strong>the</strong><br />

copyright holder. Violators will be prosecuted to <strong>the</strong> fullest extent of <strong>the</strong> law.<br />

2


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Page<br />

5 Introduction<br />

CONTENTS<br />

7 PART 1: FIBONACCI AND THE COMPASS<br />

9 What are Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s?<br />

13 Why Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s?<br />

15 <strong>Compass</strong> Terminology and Procedure<br />

16 <strong>Compass</strong> Scales<br />

16 What <strong>the</strong> <strong>Compass</strong> Does<br />

17 Chart Scales<br />

17 Price and Time<br />

19 PART II: ELLIOTT WAVE APPLICATIONS<br />

21 Typical <strong>Wave</strong> Structure<br />

22 Using <strong>the</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

25 Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong> Relationships<br />

26 Contracting Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s (<strong>for</strong> “Retracements”)<br />

31 Expanding Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s (<strong>for</strong> “Multiples” and extensions)<br />

35 A Complete List of Known Reliable Relationships Within Patterns<br />

35 Impulse <strong>Wave</strong>s<br />

35 Fifth <strong>Wave</strong>s When <strong>Wave</strong> Three is Extended<br />

35 Extensions in First or Fifth <strong>Wave</strong>s<br />

3


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

36 Corrective <strong>Wave</strong>s<br />

36 Zigzag Corrections<br />

37 B <strong>Wave</strong>s in Zigzags<br />

38 C <strong>Wave</strong>s in Zigzags<br />

38 Flat and Irregular Corrections<br />

39 B <strong>Wave</strong>s in Flats<br />

40 C <strong>Wave</strong>s in Flats<br />

40 B <strong>Wave</strong>s in Irregular Corrections<br />

41 C <strong>Wave</strong>s in Irregular Corrections<br />

41 Subwaves in Double and Triple Threes<br />

42 Subwaves in Contracting, Ascending and Descending Triangles<br />

43 Subwaves in Expanding Triangles<br />

44 Advanced <strong>Ratio</strong> Application — A Comprehensive Forecasting Method<br />

46 Real-Time Examples of Fibonacci Multiples and Retracements<br />

46 The Bond Market<br />

49 The Stock Market<br />

53 The Gold Market<br />

59 PART III: GANN ANALYSIS<br />

61 Gann Analysis<br />

61 The Gann-Blitz Approach<br />

62 Squaring of Time and Price<br />

64 1 x 1 lines<br />

64 1 x 2 lines<br />

64 2 x 1 lines<br />

65 Unequal Chart Divisions<br />

65 Gann Range Subdivisions<br />

67 Erroneous Use of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

67 Conclusion<br />

4


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

R.N. <strong>Elliott</strong> used a time-saving Fibonacci ratio<br />

calculation device, and his mention of it in “Nature’s<br />

Law” has prompted many requests <strong>for</strong> a similar tool.<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong>’s design necessitated a two-step recording procedure,<br />

since he did not have access to a compass specifically<br />

made <strong>for</strong> his purposes. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than create a copy of<br />

that more cumbersome tool, we decided to see if we could<br />

find a compass which would suit our specific needs. A<br />

long search finally turned up a company that produced a<br />

Golden <strong>Ratio</strong> compass, but <strong>the</strong> construction was cheap<br />

and <strong>the</strong> tolerated error much too great. As any trader<br />

knows, a few cents’ difference on a stock or commodity<br />

chart can mean <strong>the</strong> difference between a perfect entry<br />

and a missed opportunity.<br />

After much additional searching, we found a<br />

manufacturer which made compass tools <strong>for</strong> professional<br />

draftsmen. We felt that any less quality was unacceptable.<br />

We’re extremely happy with <strong>the</strong> tool we’ve found and<br />

hope you will be, too.<br />

Your <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong> is constructed of<br />

chromium plated solid brass, machine tooled to virtual<br />

precision. The PRC is a slim, handsome professional<br />

draftsman’s tool, built <strong>for</strong> a lifetime of use. The spread<br />

between points can be firmly locked so <strong>the</strong> compass won’t<br />

slip when being moved from one position on <strong>the</strong> chart to<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r. The compass points are sharp and true, so <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

position on <strong>the</strong> chart can be read with a minimum of<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t. In sum, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong> has been<br />

thoughtfully designed to give you years of trouble-free<br />

service.<br />

The uses of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong> are many<br />

and varied. Fibonacci retracements, Fibonacci price and<br />

time ratios, as well as all o<strong>the</strong>r ratios (from 1:10 to 10:1),<br />

can all be marked on a chart with a quick movement and<br />

a minimum of ef<strong>for</strong>t.<br />

5


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

The following pages will show you in detail how to apply <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Compass</strong>. Undoubtedly <strong>the</strong>re are uses <strong>for</strong> it which we have yet to<br />

discover. If you find any, please let us know. Perhaps your ideas will<br />

appear in <strong>the</strong> next edition of this manual.<br />

Robert R. Prechter, Jr.<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> International<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This manual would not be here in its present <strong>for</strong>m without <strong>the</strong><br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t and talents of David A. Allman. His editing and illustrative<br />

skills, as well as his dedication to <strong>the</strong> project, were invaluable in<br />

attaining <strong>the</strong> quality we required <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> final product.<br />

Background charts <strong>for</strong> some of <strong>the</strong> illustrations were provided<br />

courtesy of <strong>the</strong> following sources:<br />

Trendline (a division of Standard and Poor’s Corp.),<br />

345 Hudson St., New York, NY 10014<br />

Daily Graphs (a division of William O’Neil & Co., Inc.),<br />

P.O. Box 24933, Los Angeles, CA 90024<br />

Commodity Researach Bureau,<br />

75 Montgomery Street, Jersey City, NJ 07302<br />

6


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

PART I<br />

FIBONACCI AND THE COMPASS<br />

7


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

8


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

WHAT ARE FIBONACCI RATIOS?<br />

Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s are <strong>the</strong> ratios between numbers<br />

at a distance infinitely far along in any sequence which<br />

is derived by adding a number to <strong>the</strong> previous number to<br />

obtain <strong>the</strong> next. Like pi, <strong>the</strong>se ratios are irrational numbers,<br />

i.e., <strong>the</strong>y cannot be expressed precisely in ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

fractional or decimal <strong>for</strong>m. The “Fibonacci Sequence” is<br />

<strong>the</strong> best known and <strong>the</strong> most basic additive sequence of<br />

this type. It is derived by adding each number, starting<br />

with <strong>the</strong> number 1, to <strong>the</strong> one just prior to it to obtain <strong>the</strong><br />

next number. Thus, 1 added to nothing gives a second 1.<br />

1 + 1 gives 2, 2 + 1 gives 3, 3 + 2 gives 5, 5 + 3 gives 8,<br />

and so on. The first sixteen terms in <strong>the</strong> sequence are 1,<br />

1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610 and<br />

987. A full ma<strong>the</strong>matical description of <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci<br />

sequence can be found in FIBONACCI NUMBERS by<br />

N. Vorobev, and a description of its relevance to <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

markets can be found in Chapters 3 and 4 of<br />

ELLIOTT WAVE PRINCIPLE (New Classics Library,<br />

$29).<br />

Figure 1<br />

9


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 2<br />

10


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

As infinity is approached, <strong>the</strong> ratio between<br />

adjacent Fibonacci numbers, smaller over larger, is<br />

.6180339... (phi), commonly abbreviated as .618; <strong>the</strong><br />

inverse (larger over smaller), gives 1.618.<br />

As infinity is approached, <strong>the</strong> ratio between<br />

alternate Fibonacci numbers, smaller over larger, is<br />

.382; <strong>the</strong> inverse (larger over samller), gives 2.618.<br />

The ratios <strong>for</strong> second alternate Fibonacci<br />

numbers are .236 and 4.236.<br />

The ratios <strong>for</strong> third alternate Fibonacci numbers<br />

are .146 and 6.854.<br />

This progression can be continued <strong>for</strong>ever, as<br />

demonstrated in <strong>the</strong> bottom row and far right column<br />

of Figure 2 (from “Historical and Ma<strong>the</strong>matical Background”<br />

chapter of <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle). Note that<br />

each of <strong>the</strong> decreasing ratios is <strong>the</strong> result of multiplying<br />

<strong>the</strong> preceding ratio by .618 and each of <strong>the</strong> increasing<br />

ratios is <strong>the</strong> result of multiplying <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />

ratio by 1.618. It is <strong>for</strong> this reason that any<br />

Fibonacci ratio can be calculated with only one or<br />

two quick and simple steps with <strong>the</strong> PRC.<br />

The spiral-like <strong>for</strong>m of market action is repeatedly<br />

shown to be governed by <strong>the</strong> Golden <strong>Ratio</strong>, and,<br />

as has often been observed, even <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci numbers<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves appear in market statistics more often<br />

than mere chance would allow. However, it is crucial<br />

to understand that <strong>the</strong> numbers <strong>the</strong>mselves have no<br />

<strong>the</strong>oretic weight in <strong>the</strong> grand concept of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle.<br />

It is <strong>the</strong> ratio which is <strong>the</strong> key to growth patterns<br />

of this type because, although it is rarely pointed out<br />

in <strong>the</strong> literature, <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci ratio results from this<br />

type of additive sequence no matter what two numbers<br />

start <strong>the</strong> sequence. Take, <strong>for</strong> instance, two randomly<br />

selected numbers and add <strong>the</strong>m to produce a third, continuing<br />

in that manner to produce additional numbers.<br />

11


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

You will find that as this sequence approaches infinity,<br />

<strong>the</strong> ratio between adjacent terms in <strong>the</strong> sequence will<br />

approach .618... This relationship becomes obvious generally<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> tenth term is produced (see Figure 3,<br />

using <strong>the</strong> starting numbers 17 and 352). Thus, while specific<br />

numbers making up <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci sequence are not<br />

necessarily important in markets, <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci ratio is a<br />

basic law of geometric progression, and does govern<br />

many relationships in data series relating to natural<br />

phenomena of growth and decay.<br />

Figure 3<br />

12


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

WHY FIBONACCI RATIOS?<br />

The occurrence of Fibonacci ratios in markets is<br />

not coincidence, and it is not a mystical numerological<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory developed in an ivory tower and <strong>for</strong>ced into real<br />

life situations. When <strong>Elliott</strong> began to research <strong>the</strong> markets,<br />

he had no idea that <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci sequence would<br />

be representative of his eventual discovery. What he<br />

found initially was that <strong>the</strong> basic Dow Theory idea that<br />

primary bull markets traveled in three upward phases<br />

applied to all degrees of market trend, from hourly waves<br />

to those lasting centuries. From this discovery, he developed<br />

a system of naming and labeling <strong>the</strong> different sizes<br />

of waves, and soon realized that <strong>the</strong> total number of waves<br />

in each degree turned out to be a different Fibonacci number.<br />

In fact, <strong>the</strong>se totals not only produced <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci<br />

sequence, but did so exactly, with no omissions and no<br />

repetitions.<br />

The discussion below is a reprint from <strong>the</strong> “Historical<br />

and Ma<strong>the</strong>matical Background” chapter of <strong>Elliott</strong><br />

<strong>Wave</strong> Principle, and illustrates this concept.<br />

We can generate <strong>the</strong> complete Fibonacci sequence<br />

by using <strong>Elliott</strong>’s explanation of <strong>the</strong> natural progression<br />

of markets. If we start with <strong>the</strong> simplest<br />

expression of <strong>the</strong> concept of a bear swing, we get<br />

one straight line decline. A bull swing, in its<br />

simplest <strong>for</strong>m, is one straight line advance. A<br />

complete cycle is two lines. In <strong>the</strong> next degree<br />

of complexity, <strong>the</strong> corresponding numbers are<br />

3, 5 and 8. As illustrated, this sequence can be<br />

taken to infinity.<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong> came to <strong>the</strong> conclusion, and rightly so, that<br />

<strong>the</strong> stock market, as a measure of <strong>the</strong> value of<br />

man’s productive capacity, is a direct recording of<br />

changes in mankind’s progress and regress through<br />

history. The fact that this process is governed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fibonacci sequence, fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, led to<br />

13


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 4<br />

<strong>Elliott</strong>’s ultimate <strong>the</strong>ory that man’s progress<br />

through history was following a natural law of<br />

growth often found in nature’s growth/decay and<br />

expansion/contraction phenomena.<br />

The Fibonacci ratio enters <strong>the</strong> picture when we<br />

realize that <strong>the</strong> number of waves in a correction approximates<br />

61.8% of <strong>the</strong> number of waves in <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />

impulse wave of <strong>the</strong> same degree. The ideal<br />

irrational number phi (.618...) is approached by<br />

14


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

this method <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r on breaks down <strong>the</strong> wave, that<br />

is, <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>the</strong> number of subwaves one counts. Empirical<br />

evidence reveals, moreover, that Fibonacci ratio<br />

relationships occur throughout <strong>the</strong> price structure in markets.<br />

The following pages will give specific examples of<br />

<strong>the</strong> most common occurrences.<br />

COMPASS TERMINOLOGY AND PROCEDURE<br />

For <strong>the</strong> purpose of this manual, we will refer to<br />

<strong>the</strong> compass as having points AB (top, narrow end) and<br />

points CD (bottom, wide end), as shown in Figure 5. The<br />

procedure <strong>for</strong> setting <strong>the</strong> center guide is as follows: Close<br />

<strong>the</strong> compass, loosen <strong>the</strong> center guide nut, set <strong>the</strong> scale as<br />

desired, and tighten <strong>the</strong> nut. The ratio you have chosen<br />

will remain fixed <strong>for</strong> whatever distance you now open<br />

<strong>the</strong> compass. For <strong>the</strong> balance of this manual, all distances<br />

will be designated by a bar underneath <strong>the</strong> points in question.<br />

For example, <strong>the</strong> distance between points A and B<br />

will be referred to as AB.<br />

15


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

COMPASS SCALES<br />

Generally, proportional dividers are used <strong>for</strong> dividing<br />

lines into equal parts, <strong>for</strong> enlarging or reducing<br />

length by different ratios, or <strong>for</strong> dividing <strong>the</strong> circumference<br />

of a circle into equal parts. The left hand scale of<br />

this compass is used <strong>for</strong> length multiples while <strong>the</strong> right<br />

hand scale is used <strong>for</strong> circle division.<br />

To relate <strong>the</strong> two scales, notice that <strong>the</strong> sequence<br />

of Fibonacci ratios, 1.618, 2.618, 4.236, 6.854, 11.090,<br />

17.944, 29.034, 46.978, 76.012..., when multiplied by<br />

pi, 3.1416..., yields <strong>the</strong> series 5 + .1, 8 + .2, 13 + .3, 21 +<br />

.5, 34 + .8, 55 + 1.3, 89 + 2.1 +.1, 144 + 3.4 + .2, 233 +<br />

5.5 + .3... Notice that <strong>the</strong> numbers of <strong>the</strong> first sequence<br />

on <strong>the</strong> left-hand (lines) scale of <strong>the</strong> PRC correspond to<br />

<strong>the</strong> numbers of <strong>the</strong> second sequence on <strong>the</strong> right-hand<br />

(circles) scale fo <strong>the</strong> PRC. One <strong>for</strong>mula illustrating <strong>the</strong><br />

eternal relationship between pi and phi is as follows:<br />

F n ≈ 100 x π 2 x φ (15-n) , where φ = .618..., n<br />

represents <strong>the</strong> numerical position of <strong>the</strong> term in <strong>the</strong><br />

sequence and F n represents <strong>the</strong> term itself. The<br />

number ‘1’ is represented only once. This F 1 ≈ 1,<br />

F 2 ≈ 2, F 3 ≈ 3, F 4 ≈ 5, etc.<br />

For example, let n = 7. Then<br />

F 7 ≈ 100 x 3.1416 2 x .6180339 (15-7)<br />

≈ 986.97 x .6180339 8<br />

≈ 986.97 x .02129 ≈ 21.01 ≈ 21<br />

WHAT THE COMPASS DOES<br />

Very simply, <strong>the</strong> distance between points C and<br />

D will be <strong>the</strong> multiple of <strong>the</strong> distance between points<br />

A and B which is indicated on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale of<br />

<strong>the</strong> compass. For example, if <strong>the</strong> compass is set on<br />

“5”, CD will be 5 times as long as AB. AB, in turn,<br />

will be 1/5 as long as CD. Because of space<br />

16


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

restrictions, <strong>the</strong> Golden section marking <strong>for</strong> length has<br />

been placed on <strong>the</strong> right-hand scale.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> left hand scale of <strong>the</strong> compass is set at<br />

Fibonacci multiples, CD will be a Fibonacci multiple of<br />

AB, while AB will equal <strong>the</strong> inverse Fibonacci multiple<br />

of CD. For example, when <strong>the</strong> center guide reference is<br />

placed at “GS”, Golden Section (on <strong>the</strong> right-hand scale<br />

of <strong>the</strong> compass), <strong>the</strong> distance at <strong>the</strong> narrow end AB will<br />

always equal .618 of <strong>the</strong> distance of <strong>the</strong> wide end CD.<br />

Conversely, CD = 1.618 x AB. We frequently refer to <strong>the</strong><br />

right-hand scale under “USING THE COMPASS” because<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is often a convenient equivalent marking<br />

correspoinding to <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci ratio we wish to locate<br />

on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale.<br />

CHART SCALES<br />

All <strong>the</strong> charts in this manual use arithmetic scale.<br />

The difference between arithmetic and semi-logarithmic<br />

chart scale is that equal vertical distances on arithmetic<br />

charts reflect an equal number of points traveled whereas<br />

equal vertical distances on semi-log charts reflect equal<br />

percentage changes. Empirical research confirms that<br />

Fibonacci relationships in markets, in almost all cases,<br />

are based upon <strong>the</strong> number of actual points traveled, an<br />

observation which is consistent with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical basis<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle. To obtain true multiples, <strong>the</strong> PRC<br />

must always be used on charts with arithmetic scale. Fortunately,<br />

this requirement fits <strong>the</strong> industry standard since<br />

9 out of 10 chart services use arithmetic scale.<br />

PRICE AND TIME<br />

All examples under “USING THE COMPASS”<br />

refer to Fibonacci price relationships. These relationships<br />

are always determined by <strong>the</strong> vertical<br />

17


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 6<br />

distance covered on a chart by a wave. In <strong>the</strong>se<br />

examples, do not measure from <strong>the</strong> actual beginning<br />

of a wave to <strong>the</strong> actual end, a process which would<br />

include time in <strong>the</strong> calculation, but ra<strong>the</strong>r vertically<br />

to <strong>the</strong> price level of <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> wave.<br />

You will see that in each of <strong>the</strong> calculations, <strong>the</strong><br />

PRC is placed with one point at <strong>the</strong> origin of <strong>the</strong> wave<br />

to be measured and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r point vertically equivalent<br />

to <strong>the</strong> terminus of that same wave. (See Figure 6.)<br />

Although experience reveals that Fibonacci time<br />

realtionships are less commonly found in markets than<br />

Fibonacci price relationships, <strong>the</strong> PRC can be used to<br />

discover where in <strong>the</strong> past or future <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci time<br />

multiples lie. Just apply <strong>the</strong> <strong>Compass</strong> in exactly <strong>the</strong> same<br />

manner as described under “USING THE COMPASS,”<br />

but do it along <strong>the</strong> horizontal axis instead of <strong>the</strong> vertical.<br />

When reading <strong>the</strong> instructions, replace <strong>the</strong> word “vertical”<br />

with <strong>the</strong> word “horizontal” and <strong>the</strong> word “wave”<br />

with <strong>the</strong> words “time segment.”<br />

18


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

PART II<br />

ELLIOTT WAVE APPLICATIONS<br />

19


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

20


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

TYPICAL WAVE STRUCTURE<br />

This graph of one rendition of an ideal <strong>Elliott</strong> wave<br />

has been created as a reference <strong>for</strong> this manual. It contains<br />

all of <strong>the</strong> multiples and retracements discussed on<br />

<strong>the</strong> following pages. The index numbers starting at 1000<br />

are <strong>for</strong> an imaginary market. Actual real-time examples<br />

begin on page 46.<br />

Figure 7<br />

The exercises under “USING THE COMPASS”<br />

on <strong>the</strong> following pages involve ratio relationships which<br />

are commonly found in real-life markets. They will show<br />

you how to apply <strong>the</strong> PRC quickly and efficiently to<br />

project targets based upon many of <strong>the</strong>se measurements.<br />

Once you’ve mastered <strong>the</strong> PRC, you should memorize<br />

<strong>the</strong> complete list of known reliable wave relationships,<br />

which begins on page 35.<br />

21


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

USING THE COMPASS<br />

1.00 (equality)<br />

After closing <strong>the</strong> PRC, <strong>the</strong> center guide may be set at any<br />

point on <strong>the</strong> scale and ei<strong>the</strong>r end may be used depending<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> wave in question. Place point A<br />

(or C) at one end and point B (or D) at a vertical equivalent<br />

to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end of a recently completed move to<br />

determine its length. Then, transfer this distance to <strong>the</strong><br />

extreme point of <strong>the</strong> most recent move to project an<br />

equivalent length.<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a 1.00<br />

multiple of wave (A) as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> low of wave<br />

(C). Refer to Figure 8.<br />

Example: wave (A) = wave (C)<br />

.50<br />

Procedure: Close <strong>the</strong> PRC. Set <strong>the</strong> center guide at 2 on<br />

<strong>the</strong> left hand scale. Place point C at one end and point D<br />

at a vertical equivalent to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end of a recently completed<br />

move. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass. AB = .50 x CD.<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark a standard 50%<br />

retracement of <strong>the</strong> entire advancing wave from ((0)) 0<br />

through 5 as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> next correction. A 50%<br />

correction is likely since it is quite near <strong>the</strong> typical<br />

retracement point marked by <strong>the</strong> previous fourth wave<br />

low at 4. Refer to Figure 9.<br />

Example: Next major correction = .50 x entire wave<br />

22


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 8<br />

Figure 9<br />

23


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

As you may have already deduced, all desired ratios<br />

from 1:10 to 10:1 may be obtained by simply adjusting<br />

<strong>the</strong> setting on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale (or <strong>the</strong> right-hand<br />

scale equivalent) of <strong>the</strong> PRC. For orientation, if you were<br />

to set <strong>the</strong> center guide at 1 on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale (lowest<br />

hash mark), <strong>the</strong> distance between points A and B, AB,<br />

and points C and D, CD, would be identical (AB = CD).<br />

The compass settings <strong>for</strong> AB/CD relationships most useful<br />

<strong>for</strong> market analysis are listed below.<br />

.50/2.00. Set PRC at 2.00 on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale.<br />

AB = .50 x CD, and CD = 2.00 x AB.<br />

.618/1.618. Set PRC at GS on <strong>the</strong> right-hand scale.<br />

AB = .618 x CD, and CD = 1.618 x AB.<br />

.382/2.618. Set PRC at 8.2 on <strong>the</strong> right-hand scale.<br />

AB = .382 x CD, and CD = 2.618 x AB.<br />

.236/4.236. Set PRC at 13.3 on <strong>the</strong> right-hand scale.<br />

AB = .236 x CD, and CD = 4.236 x AB.<br />

.146/6.854. Set PRC at 6.854 on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale.<br />

AB = .146 x CD, and CD = 6.854 x AB.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> most precise application of all Fibonacci<br />

ratios using <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong>, however, keep<br />

<strong>the</strong> setting on GS. To understand why, take a few minutes<br />

to study <strong>the</strong> unique properties of <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci ratio,<br />

phi, as presented in <strong>the</strong> following tables.<br />

24


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

FIBONACCI RATIO RELATIONSHIPS<br />

Multiplicative<br />

.618 x .618 = .382<br />

.382 x .618 = .236<br />

.236 x .618 = .146<br />

.146 x .618 = .090, etc.<br />

Additive<br />

1.000 - .618 = .382<br />

.618 - .382 = .236<br />

.382 - .236 = .146<br />

.236 - .146 = .090, etc.<br />

These properties of <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci ratio are also<br />

true with regard to <strong>the</strong> inverse of phi, 1.618:<br />

Multiplicative<br />

1.618 x 1.618 = 2.618<br />

2.618 x 1.618 = 4.236<br />

4.236 x 1.618 = 6.854, etc.<br />

Additive<br />

1.000 + 1.618 = 2.618<br />

1.618 + 2.618 = 4.236<br />

2.618 + 4.236 = 6.854, etc.<br />

Once you understand <strong>the</strong>se tables, you will quickly<br />

see why all Fibonacci multiples and retracements can<br />

be obtained with <strong>the</strong> PRC without ever changing <strong>the</strong><br />

setting. As a matter of fact, <strong>the</strong> most common multiples<br />

and retracements which are found in everyday markets<br />

can be marked on your charts in a matter of seconds<br />

after a bit of practice with <strong>the</strong> PRC. Simply set <strong>the</strong> center<br />

guide at GS on <strong>the</strong> right-hand scale and use <strong>the</strong> compass<br />

as described in <strong>the</strong> section beginning on page 26.<br />

25


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Contracting Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s<br />

(<strong>for</strong> “Retracements”)<br />

Use <strong>the</strong> wide end of <strong>the</strong> PRC (points C and D) to<br />

measure <strong>the</strong> vertical distance of <strong>the</strong> move <strong>for</strong> which you<br />

desire Fibonacci retracements points. See Figure 10a<br />

Figure 10a<br />

Step #1) For .618 retracements: Keeping CD fixed, flip<br />

<strong>the</strong> compass. Now, AB is a .618 retracement of your original<br />

distance. Measure from <strong>the</strong> top down and mark this<br />

point W. See Figure 10b.<br />

Figure 10b<br />

26


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Step #2) For .382 retracements: Keeping <strong>the</strong> PRC fixed,<br />

measure from <strong>the</strong> bottom up and mark a second point, X.<br />

The remaining length is a .382 retracement of your original<br />

distance. See Figure 10c.<br />

Figure 10c<br />

Set #3) For .236 retracements: Contract <strong>the</strong> PRC, placing<br />

compass points A and B on points W and X. This<br />

length is a .236 retracement of your original distance.<br />

Keeping <strong>the</strong> PRC fixed, measure from <strong>the</strong> top down and<br />

mark point Y. See Figure 10d.<br />

Figure 10d<br />

27


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Step #4) For .146 retracements: Contract <strong>the</strong> PRC,<br />

placing compass points A and B on points X and Y.<br />

This length is a .146 retracement of your original<br />

distance. Keeping <strong>the</strong> PRC fixed, measure from <strong>the</strong> top<br />

down and mark point Z.<br />

Thus, in four quick steps, you have marked all <strong>the</strong><br />

important retracements of your original distance, CD. See<br />

Figure 10e.<br />

Figure 10e<br />

The above directions are applicable to<br />

retracements of a rally. For retracements of a decline, of<br />

course, you must measure from <strong>the</strong> bottom up in Steps<br />

#1, 3 and 4, and from <strong>the</strong> top down in Step #2.<br />

Once you become adept at using <strong>the</strong> PRC, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are even more shortcuts possible. For example, if you<br />

want only a .382 retracement, Step #2 works independently.<br />

If you want only a .236 retracement, follow Step<br />

#2, flip <strong>the</strong> compass, and contract it so that its points fit<br />

<strong>the</strong> .382 span. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass again. Now, AB is a .236<br />

retracement of your original distance.<br />

28


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Let’s apply this method to our textbook graph:<br />

.618<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a .618<br />

retracement of wave 1 as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> low of wave<br />

2. Refer to Step #1 and Figure 11.<br />

Example: wave 2 = .618 x wave 1<br />

Figure 11<br />

.382<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a .382<br />

retracement of wave 3 as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> low of wave<br />

4. Refer to Step #2 and Figure 12.<br />

Example: wave 4 = .382 x wave 3<br />

Figure 12<br />

29


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

.236<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a .236<br />

retracement of wave (1) as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> low of<br />

wave (2). Refer to Steps #2-3 and Figure 13.<br />

Example: wave (2) = .236 x wave (1)<br />

Figure 13<br />

.146<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a .146<br />

retracement of wave (3) as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> low of<br />

wave (4). Refer to steps #2-4 and Figure 14.<br />

Example: wave (4) = .146 x wave (3)<br />

Figure 14<br />

30


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Expanding Fibonacci <strong>Ratio</strong>s<br />

(<strong>for</strong> “Multiples” and extensions)<br />

Use <strong>the</strong> narrow end of <strong>the</strong> PRC (points A and B)<br />

to measure <strong>the</strong> vertical distance of <strong>the</strong> move <strong>for</strong> which<br />

you desire Fibonacci multiples.<br />

Step 1) For 1.618 multiples: Flip <strong>the</strong> compass, keeping<br />

<strong>the</strong> spread fixed. CD now measures 1.618 times <strong>the</strong> original<br />

distance. Place point C on <strong>the</strong> chart at <strong>the</strong> point from<br />

which you wish to project a longer wave. Place point D<br />

vertically above or below it. Make a small mark where<br />

point D touches <strong>the</strong> paper. See Figure 15.<br />

Figure 15<br />

31


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Step 2) For 2.618 multiples: After following <strong>the</strong> above<br />

steps, flip and expand <strong>the</strong> PRC so that <strong>the</strong> narrow end<br />

fits <strong>the</strong> 1.618 multiple distance. Now, CD = 2.618 times<br />

your original distance. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass again and mark<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2.618 multiple. See Figure 16.<br />

Step 3) For 4.236 multiples: The sum of <strong>the</strong> 1.618 and<br />

2.618 multiples yields 4.236 times <strong>the</strong> original distance.<br />

Just flip <strong>the</strong> compass and add AB (which is now <strong>the</strong> 1.618<br />

multiple length) to <strong>the</strong> 2.618 multiple distance. See<br />

Figure 16.<br />

Figure 16<br />

Let’s again apply this method to our textbook graph:<br />

32


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

1.618<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a 1.618<br />

multiple of wave (1) as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> length of wave<br />

(3). Refer to Step #1 and Figure 17.<br />

Example: wave (3) = 1.618 x wave (1)<br />

Figure 17<br />

2.618<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to mark <strong>the</strong> level of a 2.618<br />

multiple of wave 1 as an estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> length of wave<br />

3. Refer to Steps #1-2 and Figure 18.<br />

Example: wave 3 = 2.618 x wave 1<br />

Figure 18<br />

33


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

4.236<br />

Sample Objective: You wish to corroborate your<br />

preferred count by finding additional internal<br />

Fibonacci relationships between waves. Refer to Steps<br />

#1-3 and Figure 19.<br />

Example: wave 3 = 4.236 x wave 2<br />

Figure 19<br />

Smaller or larger multiples can be obtained<br />

with <strong>the</strong> PRC by adding or subtracting multiples of<br />

first generation ratios. For example, .236 - .146 = .090,<br />

while 2.618 + 4.236 = 6.854. Note: While <strong>the</strong>se<br />

methods can be followed infinitely, we have found<br />

little evidence that <strong>the</strong> extremely large or extremely<br />

small Fibonacci ratios are of any practical value.<br />

34


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

A COMPLETE LIST OF KNOWN RELIABLE<br />

RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN PATTERNS<br />

developed by<br />

R.N. ELLIOTT and R.R. PRECHTER, JR.<br />

The following pages list <strong>the</strong> most common and<br />

useful Fibonacci ratio relationships in markets.<br />

IMPULSE WAVES<br />

Fifth <strong>Wave</strong>s When <strong>Wave</strong> Three is Extended<br />

(see Figure 20)<br />

The most common multiple is 1.00 times <strong>the</strong> length<br />

of wave 1. Transfer <strong>the</strong> fixed length of wave 1 to <strong>the</strong> end<br />

of wave 4 to project <strong>the</strong> end of wave 5.<br />

The next most common multiple is .618 times <strong>the</strong><br />

length of wave 1. Follow Step #1 under “Retracements”<br />

on page 26 to project this target.<br />

The next most common multiple is 1.618 times<br />

<strong>the</strong> length of wave 1. Follow Step #1 under “Multiples”<br />

on page 31 to project this target.<br />

Extensions in First or Fifth <strong>Wave</strong>s<br />

(see Figure 20)<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most common multiple <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

extended wave is 1.618 times <strong>the</strong> net price advance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two impulse waves. Thus, when wave 5 is<br />

extended, <strong>the</strong> most common multiple <strong>for</strong> its length is<br />

1.618 times <strong>the</strong> length of wave 1 through wave 3.<br />

Similarly, when wave 1 is extended, <strong>the</strong> most common<br />

multiple <strong>for</strong> its length is 1.618 times <strong>the</strong> length<br />

of waves 3 through 5. Follow Step #1 under “Multiples”<br />

to project this target.<br />

35


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 20<br />

CORRECTIVE WAVES<br />

Zigzag Corrections<br />

The most common retracement is 61.8% of <strong>the</strong><br />

previous impulse wave and is most likely when <strong>the</strong><br />

correction itself is in <strong>the</strong> “wave 2” position. Follow<br />

Step #1 under “Retracements” to project this target.<br />

See Figure 21.<br />

Figure 21<br />

36


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

The next most common retracement is 50%. See<br />

page 22 to project this target.<br />

The least common retracement is 38.2%. Follow<br />

Step #2 under “Retracements” to project this target.<br />

Figure 22<br />

B <strong>Wave</strong>s in Zigzags<br />

(See Figure 22)<br />

The most common retracement of wave A is<br />

38.2%. Follow Step #2 under “Retracements” to project<br />

this target.<br />

The next most common retracement is 61.8% of<br />

wave A. Follow Step #1 under “Retracements” to project<br />

this target.<br />

The next most common retracement is 50%. See<br />

page 22 to project this target.<br />

These same relationships also apply in regard to<br />

X waves as retracements of first or second zigzags in a<br />

double or triple zigzag <strong>for</strong>mation. (See Figure 23).<br />

37


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 23<br />

C <strong>Wave</strong>s in Zigzags<br />

(See Figure 23)<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most common multiple is 1.00 times<br />

<strong>the</strong> length of wave A. Transfer <strong>the</strong> fixed length <strong>for</strong> wave<br />

A to <strong>the</strong> end of wave B to project <strong>the</strong> end of wave C.<br />

The next most common multiple is 1.618 times<br />

<strong>the</strong> length of A. Follow step #1 under “multiples” to<br />

project this target.<br />

The least common multiple is .618 times <strong>the</strong> length<br />

of A. Follow Step #1 under “Retracements” to project<br />

this target.<br />

These same relationships apply to second zigzags<br />

relative to first zigzags in a double zigzag pattern.<br />

Flat and Irregular Corrections<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most common retracement is 38.2% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous impulse wave. Follow Step #2 under<br />

“Retracements” to project this target. See Figure 24.<br />

38


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 24<br />

Figure 25<br />

The next most common retracement is 23.6%.<br />

Follow Steps #2-3 under “Retracements” to project this<br />

target.<br />

The least common retracements are 50% and<br />

61.8%, which occur only when <strong>the</strong> correction itself is in<br />

<strong>the</strong> wave B or wave 2 position. See page 22 or follow<br />

Step #1 under “Retracements” respectively to project<br />

<strong>the</strong>se targets.<br />

B <strong>Wave</strong>s in Flats<br />

The only retracement is 100% of <strong>the</strong> preceding A<br />

wave. Expect wave B to end at <strong>the</strong> same level from which<br />

wave A began. See Figure 25.<br />

39


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

C <strong>Wave</strong>s in Flats<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most common multiple is just over 1.00<br />

times <strong>the</strong> length of A. Transfer <strong>the</strong> fixed length <strong>for</strong> wave<br />

A to <strong>the</strong> end of wave B to project <strong>the</strong> end of wave C.<br />

Then look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> market to turn slightly beyond that point.<br />

See Figure 25.<br />

Figure 26<br />

B <strong>Wave</strong>s in Irregular Corrections<br />

The most reliable multiple with respect to irregular<br />

corrections is <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> lengths of<br />

waves A and C (see Figure 26). However, often B waves<br />

will fit one of <strong>the</strong>se two cases:<br />

The most common Fibonacci multiple <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

length of wave B is 1.236 times <strong>the</strong> preceding A wave.<br />

Follow Steps #2-3 under “Retracements” and add this<br />

length to <strong>the</strong> beginning of wave A to project a 1.236<br />

multiple.<br />

40


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

The next most common Fibonacci multiple is<br />

1.382 times <strong>the</strong> preceding A wave. Follow Step #2 under<br />

“Retracements” and add this length to <strong>the</strong> beginning of<br />

wave A to project a 1.382 multiple.<br />

C <strong>Wave</strong>s in Irregular Corrections<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most common multiple is 1.618 times<br />

<strong>the</strong> length of wave A. Follow Step #1 under “Multiples”<br />

to project this target. See Figure 26.<br />

The next most common multiple is 2.618 times<br />

<strong>the</strong> length of A. Follow Steps #1-2 under “Multiples” to<br />

project this target.<br />

Figure 27<br />

Figure 28<br />

Subwaves in Double and Triple Threes<br />

(See Figures 27, 28)<br />

The most common relationship is that each “three”<br />

is 1.00 times <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> adjacent “threes.” Expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> second and third three each to end just beyond <strong>the</strong><br />

level at which <strong>the</strong> first “three” ended.<br />

41


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

The next most common relationship is that<br />

alternate “threes” are related by 1.618. Follow Step<br />

#1 under “Multiples” to project this target.<br />

The least common relationship is that adjacent<br />

“threes” are related by 1.618. Follow Step #1 under<br />

“Multiples” to project this target.<br />

Figure 29<br />

Subwaves in Contracting, Ascending<br />

and Descending Triangles<br />

(See Figure 29)<br />

The most common relationship is that each<br />

subwave is .618 times <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

alternate subwave, i.e., wave e = .618 x wave c =<br />

.382 x wave a; wave d = .618 x wave b. Follow Step #1<br />

under “Retracements” to project <strong>the</strong>se targets.<br />

The next most common relationship is that each<br />

subwave is .618 times <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

adjacent subwave, i.e., wave e = .618 x wave d = .382<br />

x wave c = .236 x wave b = .146 x wave a. Follow<br />

Step #1 under “Retracements” to project <strong>the</strong>se targets.<br />

42


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 30<br />

Subwaves in Expanding Triangles<br />

(See Figure 30)<br />

The most common relationship is that each<br />

subwave is 1.618 times <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

alternate subwave, i.e., wave e = 1.618 x wave c =<br />

2.618 x wave a; wave d = 1.618 x wave b. Follow<br />

Step #1 under “Multiples” to project <strong>the</strong>se targets.<br />

The next most common relationship is that each<br />

subwave is 1.618 times <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

adjacent subwave, i.e., wave e = 1.618 x wave d =<br />

2.618 x wave c = 4.236 x wave b = 6.854 x wave a.<br />

Follow Step #1 under “Multiples” to project <strong>the</strong>se<br />

targets.<br />

43


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

ADVANCED RATIO APPLICATION —<br />

A COMPREHENSIVE FORECASTING METHOD<br />

Keep in mind that all degrees of trend are always<br />

operating on <strong>the</strong> market at <strong>the</strong> same time. There<strong>for</strong>e, at<br />

any given moment <strong>the</strong> market will be full of Fibonacci<br />

ratio relationships, all occurring with respect to <strong>the</strong> various<br />

wave degrees unfolding. It follows that points which<br />

are found to be in Fibonacci relationship to several<br />

market lengths have a greater likelihood of marking a<br />

turning point in <strong>the</strong> future than a point which is in<br />

Fibonacci relationship to only one length.<br />

The group-ratio approach works best when <strong>the</strong><br />

guidelines of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle are kept in mind.<br />

For instance, if a .618 retracement of a Primary wave 1<br />

by a Primary wave 2 gives a particular target, and within<br />

it, a 1.618 multiple of Intermediate wave (A) in an irregular<br />

correction gives <strong>the</strong> same target <strong>for</strong> Intermediate<br />

wave (C), and within that, a 1.00 multiple of Minor wave<br />

1 gives <strong>the</strong> same target yet again <strong>for</strong> Minor wave 5, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

you have a most powerful argument <strong>for</strong> expecting a turn<br />

at that calculated price level. Figure 31 illustrates this<br />

example.<br />

Figure 31<br />

At <strong>the</strong> target market by <strong>the</strong> arrow,<br />

2 = .618 1, (C) = 1.618 (A), and 5=1<br />

44


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

If one of <strong>the</strong> above calculations were to yield<br />

one level, but two of <strong>the</strong>m were to yield ano<strong>the</strong>r level,<br />

<strong>the</strong> level supported by two calculations is more likely<br />

<strong>the</strong> valid one.<br />

Years of experience have proved this to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> most valid, reliable and useful approach to price<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecasting in markets. The graph on page 21 is full<br />

of such confirming ratios, and serves as a good<br />

illustration of how markets often build an interlocking<br />

grid of Fibonacci relationships.<br />

45


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

REAL-TIME EXAMPLES OF<br />

FIBONACCI MULTIPLES AND RETRACEMENTS<br />

Ra<strong>the</strong>r than give <strong>the</strong> reader ‘doctored-up’ examples<br />

and charts of what might transpire with regard to<br />

Fibonacci multiples and retracements, we have chosen<br />

real-time examples of how Fibonacci relationships were<br />

actually applied in <strong>for</strong>ecasting future market turning<br />

points. The following paragraphs are excerpted from past<br />

issues of The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Theorist:<br />

THE BOND MARKET<br />

November 1983<br />

“Now it’s time to attempt a more precise<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecast <strong>for</strong> bond futures prices. <strong>Wave</strong> (a) in<br />

December futures dropped 11 3/4 points, so<br />

a wave (c) equivalent subtracted from <strong>the</strong><br />

wave (b) peak at 73 1/2 last month projects<br />

a downside target of 61 3/4. It is also <strong>the</strong><br />

case that alternate waves within symmetrical<br />

triangles are usually related by .618. As<br />

it happens, wave B fell 32 points. 32 x .618<br />

= 19 3/4 points, which should be a good<br />

estimate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> length of wave D. 19 3/4<br />

points from <strong>the</strong> peak of wave C at 80<br />

projects a downside target of 60 1/4. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

<strong>the</strong> 60 1/4 - 61 3/4 area is <strong>the</strong> best<br />

point to be watching <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong><br />

current decline. This target zone fits <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that futures contracts lose premium, and if<br />

<strong>the</strong> 10 3/8 bond projects an equivalent of 63<br />

on a “cash” basis, an additional point or two<br />

would probably be lost in <strong>the</strong> price of <strong>the</strong><br />

futures contract over <strong>the</strong> time period of <strong>the</strong><br />

decline.” [See Figure 32.]<br />

46


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 32<br />

April 3, 1984 [adjusting and confirming <strong>the</strong><br />

target after (b) ended in a triangle itself]<br />

“...<strong>the</strong> ultimate downside target will probably<br />

occur nearer <strong>the</strong> point at which wave D is<br />

.618 times as long as wave B, which took<br />

place from June 1980 to September 1981 and<br />

traveled 32 points basis <strong>the</strong> weekly continuation<br />

chart. Thus, if wave D travels 19 3/4<br />

points, <strong>the</strong> nearby contract should bottom at<br />

60 1/4. In support of this target is <strong>the</strong> five<br />

wave (A), which indicates that a zigzag<br />

decline is in <strong>for</strong>ce from <strong>the</strong> May 1983 highs.<br />

Within zigzags, waves (A) and (C) are typically<br />

of equal length. Basis <strong>the</strong> June contract,<br />

47


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

wave (A) fell 11 points. 11 points from <strong>the</strong><br />

triangle peak at 70 3/4 projects 59 3/4,<br />

making <strong>the</strong> 60 zone (+ or - 1/4) a point of<br />

strong support and a potential target. As a<br />

final calculation, thrusts following triangles<br />

usually fall approximately <strong>the</strong> distance of <strong>the</strong><br />

widest part of <strong>the</strong> triangle. Based on <strong>the</strong><br />

accompanying chart, that distance is 10 1/2<br />

points, which subtracted from <strong>the</strong> triangle<br />

peak gives 60 1/4 as a target.”<br />

June 4, 1984<br />

“The bond market ended a one-year decline<br />

on May 30, hitting <strong>the</strong> long-standing <strong>Elliott</strong><br />

target of ‘59 3/4-60 1/4’ basis <strong>the</strong> nearby<br />

futures with a dramatic reversal off [an<br />

intraday] spike low at 59 1/2 on <strong>the</strong> June<br />

contract [closing that day at 59 31/32]. In <strong>the</strong><br />

2 1/2 days following that low, bonds have<br />

rebounded two full points.” [See Figure 33].<br />

Figure 33<br />

48


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

THE STOCK MARKET<br />

November 7, 1983 [See Figure 34.]<br />

“A break of Dow 1206 will virtually confirm<br />

that Primary 1 has peaked and assure a continuation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> decline. If 1158 is broken, <strong>the</strong><br />

next point of support is 1090, which marks a<br />

.382 retracement of Primary 1”.<br />

Figure 34<br />

March 5, 1984<br />

Downside Targets<br />

“As <strong>the</strong> correction progresses, we should be<br />

able to get closer and closer to estimating<br />

where <strong>the</strong> final bottom will actually occur.<br />

Here are <strong>the</strong> calculations:<br />

1) Primary wave 2 will retrace .382 of<br />

Primary wave 1 at 1094.20.<br />

2) Within <strong>the</strong> ABC decline, wave C will be<br />

.618 times as long as wave A at 1089.19.<br />

June 4, 1984 [See Figures 35, 36.]<br />

“In terms of price, <strong>the</strong> downside target of 1090<br />

was first computed seven months ago in <strong>the</strong><br />

November 7, 1983 issue. That basic target was<br />

reiterated in <strong>the</strong> March and April issues,<br />

49


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

with ‘buy’ strategy outlined (with minor<br />

variations) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1087-1099 area. The hourly<br />

low on May 30 was 1087.93.<br />

Figure 35<br />

The list of Fibonacci wave relationships now<br />

in place is so perfect as to be a compelling<br />

argument all by itself that a low is in <strong>the</strong><br />

making.<br />

1) <strong>Wave</strong> (C) at 90.99 points, is .22 of a<br />

Dow point from being exactly .618 times as<br />

long as wae (A) at 146.88 points, a typical<br />

relationship in zigzags.<br />

2) <strong>Wave</strong> (B) at 35.27 points, is 1/2 point<br />

from being exactly .382 times as long as wave<br />

(C).<br />

3) Not only is wave (A) 1.618 times as long<br />

as wave (C), which is 2.618 times as long as<br />

wave (B), but <strong>the</strong> actual lengths are remarkably<br />

close to Fibonacci numbers: 146.88<br />

points (Fibonacci 144), 90.99 points (Fibonacci<br />

89), and 35.27(Fibonacci 34).<br />

4) <strong>Wave</strong> (A) lasted 5 weeks, wave (B)<br />

lasted 13 weeks, and wave (C) lasted 3 weeks,<br />

just as <strong>for</strong>ecast in <strong>the</strong> May issue. The two<br />

impulse waves totaled 8 weeks. The entire<br />

50


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

correction lasted 21 weeks. Thus, <strong>the</strong> time<br />

lengths create <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci sequence, 3, 5, 8,<br />

13, 21, revealing that each time period, as<br />

precisely defined by <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong><br />

structures, is related to each of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs by<br />

a Fibonacci ratio.<br />

5) Even <strong>the</strong> Minor moves are related<br />

precisely by Fibonacci ratios (see March and<br />

April issues).<br />

6) The Dow Jones Transports have<br />

retraced exactly 50% of <strong>the</strong>ir 1982-1984<br />

advance as of <strong>the</strong> low on May 30.”<br />

Figure 36<br />

June 24, 1984<br />

“Today’s slight new closing low in <strong>the</strong> Dow at<br />

1086.57 generated ‘sell signals’ all over Wall<br />

Street. However, it appears to me that, just<br />

like <strong>the</strong> May 30 low and <strong>the</strong> June 15 low, this<br />

minor decline is actually providing ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

excellent opportunity to buy.<br />

Based on typical Fibonacci relationships, I<br />

doubt that our ‘stop’ at Dow 1070 hourly<br />

reading will be taken out.”<br />

51


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

August 6, 1984<br />

“The leap out of that bottom (as if you hadn’t<br />

heard) has been one <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> record books, and<br />

is powerful enough virtually to confirm that<br />

Primary wave 3 has begun. The first<br />

important level of resistance is Dow<br />

1290-1340.” [See Figure 37.]<br />

Figure 37<br />

52


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

THE GOLD MARKET<br />

The quotes presented below detail 5 consecutive<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecasts, which were made in The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Theorist<br />

between November 1979 and January 1982, as follows:<br />

1) Gold should drop to $477.<br />

Outcome: Dropped to $474.<br />

2) Gold should rise to $710.<br />

Outcome: Rose to $710.<br />

3) Gold should drop to $388.<br />

Outcome: Dropped to $388.<br />

4) Gold should undergo a rise to new highs.<br />

Outcome: Short 3-month rise followed by<br />

renewed decline. But because of stop<br />

placement, <strong>the</strong> loss on <strong>the</strong> erroneous<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecast was only $10.<br />

5) Gold going lower. Move back to <strong>the</strong> short side.<br />

Outcome: Gold dropped ano<strong>the</strong>r $90 to $296.75.<br />

Here are <strong>the</strong> exact comments which appeared:<br />

November 18, 1979<br />

“London gold appears to be in its final blowoff<br />

rally on a long term basis. One all-important<br />

question, in <strong>Elliott</strong> terms, is whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

1967-68 rise in gold stocks was actually wave I<br />

of <strong>the</strong> long term gold bull market. If <strong>the</strong> true<br />

first wave was masked by <strong>the</strong> artifical price<br />

controls on gold at $34 per ounce, <strong>the</strong>n we are<br />

witnessing <strong>the</strong> peak of <strong>the</strong> final fifth wave<br />

advance in gold from a true low in 1967! [For<br />

<strong>the</strong> time being, I will proceed under <strong>the</strong><br />

assumption that only wave III is peaking.]”<br />

53


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 38<br />

March 9, 1980<br />

“Fibonacci support levels <strong>for</strong> gold are $565,<br />

$477 and $388. An ideal <strong>Elliott</strong> scenario <strong>for</strong><br />

gold over <strong>the</strong> next year or two would be an A<br />

wave down to $477, <strong>for</strong>ming <strong>the</strong> first<br />

retracement of <strong>the</strong> extended fifth wave within<br />

wave III. Then a strong rally would ensue<br />

<strong>for</strong>ming wave B, followed by a declining<br />

wave C down to <strong>the</strong> final target of $388. The<br />

$388 level would correspond with a .618<br />

retracement of wave III and with <strong>the</strong> area of<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous fourth wave of lesser degree, a<br />

normal <strong>Elliott</strong> support level. The $388 level is<br />

<strong>the</strong> most reasonable target <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> eventual<br />

end to <strong>the</strong> large wave IV correction.” [See<br />

Figure 38.]<br />

54


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 39<br />

April 6, 1980<br />

“Gold has since declined to a low of $474 on<br />

March 18.” [See Figure 39.]<br />

May 12, 1980<br />

“There is nothing to add to my expectations<br />

<strong>for</strong> gold. ...a .618 retracement of <strong>the</strong> decline<br />

to just over $700 should be <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

potential of any intermediate rally.”<br />

July 6, 1980<br />

“I still feel that <strong>the</strong> $710 level is a very likely<br />

target <strong>for</strong> this rally.”<br />

55


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 40<br />

September 23, 1980 (<strong>the</strong> day of <strong>the</strong> high)<br />

“Gold has now hit its minimum target of $710<br />

per ounce London fixing. From here on out,<br />

I’d ra<strong>the</strong>r let <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r guy have <strong>the</strong> profits.<br />

The ‘guaranteed’ part of <strong>the</strong> rise is behind us.”<br />

[See Figure 40.]<br />

56


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 41<br />

August 5, 1981<br />

“Yesterday <strong>the</strong> Fibonacci ratio target of $388<br />

per ounce computed a year and a half ago was<br />

satisfied quite closely, and <strong>the</strong> time zone of<br />

‘mid-1981,’ refined last May to ‘August<br />

1981,’ is upon us.” [See Figures 41, 42.]<br />

Figure 42<br />

57


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

September 8, 1981<br />

“The exact low on <strong>the</strong> COMEX nearby futures<br />

contract was $388.00 and <strong>the</strong> lowest price <strong>for</strong><br />

a cash bullion sale was $388.00 by <strong>the</strong> Bank<br />

of Nova Scotia, both on <strong>the</strong> same date.”<br />

January 11, 1982<br />

“[The a-b-c rally into <strong>the</strong> September 1981<br />

high] in gold is indicating that a break of <strong>the</strong><br />

$388 level is now extremely likely. If gold<br />

fixes below $380, I suggest reinstating your<br />

short position. The net result will be as if we<br />

had never exited <strong>the</strong> short side at all.”<br />

While most commodities’ wave structures clearly indicated<br />

that wave I began in 1967, some uncertainty had<br />

existed in bullion’s pattern due to government-imposed<br />

price controls. The subsequent break of <strong>the</strong> $388 level<br />

conclusively resolved this matter, confirming <strong>the</strong> wave<br />

count shown below.<br />

Figure 43<br />

58


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

PART III<br />

GANN ANALYSIS<br />

59


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

60


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

GANN ANALYSIS<br />

The PRC is ideally suited <strong>for</strong> many of <strong>the</strong><br />

methods pracaticed by <strong>the</strong> late W.D. Gann. We do<br />

not attempt to evaluate Gann <strong>the</strong>ory in this manual,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r to illustrate <strong>the</strong> usefulness of <strong>the</strong> PRC to those<br />

already convinced of <strong>the</strong> benefits of Gann analysis.<br />

THE GANN-BLITZ APPROACH<br />

Those researchers with ei<strong>the</strong>r computers or a<br />

good deal of spare time may wish to explore a method<br />

similar to that used by Gann. Of course, <strong>the</strong> basis of<br />

Gann’s choice of “important numbers” is strictly numerological,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> long list of numbers he considered important<br />

leaves almost no number untouched. However,<br />

his idea of finding groups of such numbers to reveal highreliability<br />

future turning points can be applied successfully<br />

to Fibonacci ratios. This method is essentially a<br />

“shotgun” approach, in which <strong>the</strong> analyst takes every applicable<br />

Fibonacci ratio (2.618, 1.618, 1.00, .618, .382,<br />

... etc.), applies it to each discernible market swing on<br />

<strong>the</strong> chart, and plots every one of <strong>the</strong>se points in order to<br />

find “clusters” which might reveal “magnets” <strong>for</strong> price<br />

turning points.<br />

This approach is not as useful as that which takes<br />

into account <strong>the</strong> guidelines of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle<br />

(see ADVANCED RATIO APPLICATION). However,<br />

<strong>for</strong> those who have no desire to learn or apply <strong>the</strong> tenets<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Principle, this exercise will certainly reveal<br />

price levels which are worth watching <strong>for</strong> changes in<br />

trend. Any single price level or time zone which were to<br />

come up repeatedly during a long series of Fibonacci<br />

calculations is one that an analyst should not fail to watch<br />

closely.<br />

61


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Procedure:<br />

1) Choose <strong>the</strong> most recent swing in <strong>the</strong> market of <strong>the</strong><br />

largest degree in which you are interested and apply all<br />

<strong>the</strong> functions under “USING THE COMPASS” to that<br />

swing. Add (and subtract) each of <strong>the</strong> results to (and from)<br />

both <strong>the</strong> beginning and end of that swing and of<br />

<strong>the</strong> preceding swing of <strong>the</strong> same degree. Lightly<br />

mark all resulting price levels on <strong>the</strong> chart.<br />

2) Choose <strong>the</strong> most recent swing of <strong>the</strong> next smaller size<br />

and repeat <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

3) Continue this process until <strong>the</strong> computations have been<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med on <strong>the</strong> smallest applicable swing from <strong>the</strong><br />

available data.<br />

4) Mark with heavy lines <strong>the</strong> boundaries around those<br />

price levels which cluster, or which appear a greater than<br />

average number of times in your calculations. Look <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se areas to coincide with turning points. Experience<br />

shows that Fibonacci relationships are generally quite<br />

precise, so “clusters” should be tight where market turns<br />

are indeed likely.<br />

This method is best accomplished using a<br />

computer.<br />

SQUARING OF TIME AND PRICE<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most widely used Gann approach is<br />

that of squaring time and price. This approach is based<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> concept that lines determined by certain points<br />

of intersection of time and price will provide support<br />

and resistance <strong>for</strong> future activity. Once a top or bottom<br />

has been identified, measure <strong>for</strong>ward ‘x’ time units<br />

(i.e., hours, days, weeks, months, years) and up or down<br />

‘x’ price units (i.e., cents, dollars, points), tracing out<br />

<strong>the</strong> top (or bottom) and right side of a “square”. The<br />

diagonal of <strong>the</strong> “square”, moving <strong>for</strong>ward in time is,<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ory, significant in determining turning points in <strong>the</strong><br />

62


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

Figure 44<br />

market. This line is referred to as a 1x1 line (1 time<br />

unit by 1 price unit).<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r frequently drawn lines regarded by<br />

Gannophiles as having significance are 2x1 lines (2 time<br />

units by 1 price unit) and 1x2 lines (1 time unit by 2<br />

price units).<br />

An alternate method of ‘squaring’ is accomplished<br />

by measuring <strong>for</strong>ward in time a number<br />

of time units equal to <strong>the</strong> number of price units<br />

represented by <strong>the</strong> levels of prior significant turning<br />

points. For example, a ‘square’ <strong>for</strong> a stock with a peak at<br />

$100 per share would occur at 100 hours, days, weeks,<br />

month, years, etc. from that peak, and allegedly indicate<br />

a turning point in price at that point in time.<br />

(Note: The method described on page 64 requires <strong>the</strong><br />

use of chart paper where equal units are used <strong>for</strong><br />

time and price. An alternate method is described on<br />

page 65 <strong>for</strong> paper with unequal units.)<br />

63


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

1x1 lines<br />

Procedure: Place point C at <strong>the</strong> beginning or end of <strong>the</strong><br />

move from which <strong>the</strong> line will be drawn. Place point D<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward in time at a price equivalent to point C. Keeping<br />

point D fixed, pivot <strong>the</strong> PRC so that point C is at a time<br />

equivalent to point D (above D <strong>for</strong> bottoms, below D <strong>for</strong><br />

tops). Make a small mark. Connect <strong>the</strong> extreme point of<br />

<strong>the</strong> move to <strong>the</strong> mark, and extend <strong>the</strong> line into <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

You have just drawn a 1x1 (45 degree) line to your initial<br />

point.<br />

1x2 lines<br />

Procedure: Set <strong>the</strong> center guide at 2 on <strong>the</strong> left-hand<br />

scale. Place point A at <strong>the</strong> beginning or end of <strong>the</strong> move<br />

from which <strong>the</strong> line will be drawn. Place point B <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

in time at a price equivalent to point A. Make a small<br />

mark. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass. Place point C at <strong>the</strong> mark you<br />

have just made. Keeping point C fixed, pivot <strong>the</strong> PRC so<br />

that point D is at a time equivalent to point C (above C<br />

<strong>for</strong> bottoms, below C <strong>for</strong> tops). Make ano<strong>the</strong>r small mark.<br />

Connect <strong>the</strong> extreme point of <strong>the</strong> move to <strong>the</strong> second<br />

mark, and extend <strong>the</strong> line into <strong>the</strong> future. You have just<br />

drawn a 1x2<br />

2x1 lines<br />

Procedure: Set <strong>the</strong> center guide at 2 on <strong>the</strong> left-hand<br />

scale. Place point C at <strong>the</strong> beginning or end of <strong>the</strong> move<br />

from which <strong>the</strong> line will be drawn. Place point D <strong>for</strong>ward<br />

in time at a price equivalent to point C. Make a<br />

small mark. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass. Place point A at <strong>the</strong> mark<br />

you have just made. Keeping point A fixed, pivot <strong>the</strong> PRC<br />

so that point B is at a time equivalent to point A (above A<br />

<strong>for</strong> bottoms, below A <strong>for</strong> tops). Make ano<strong>the</strong>r small mark.<br />

Connect <strong>the</strong> extreme point of <strong>the</strong> move to <strong>the</strong> second<br />

mark, and extend <strong>the</strong> line into <strong>the</strong> future. You have just<br />

drawn a 2x1 line to your initial point.<br />

64


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

UNEQUAL CHART DIVISIONS<br />

For chart paper where <strong>the</strong> price units and <strong>the</strong><br />

time units are not equal, Gann lines are still easily<br />

drawn with <strong>the</strong> PRC by adjusting <strong>the</strong> center guide on<br />

<strong>the</strong> PRC to correspond with <strong>the</strong> ratio of time to price<br />

on your chart paper. As an example, suppose your time<br />

units are twice <strong>the</strong> size of your price units (i.e., <strong>the</strong><br />

height of paper used <strong>for</strong> 2 points is equal to <strong>the</strong> length<br />

of paper used <strong>for</strong> 1 day). Your objective is to draw a<br />

1x1 line. Set <strong>the</strong> center guide at 2 on <strong>the</strong> left-hand scale.<br />

Place point C at <strong>the</strong> beginning or end of <strong>the</strong> move from<br />

which <strong>the</strong> line will be drawn. Place point D <strong>for</strong>ward in<br />

time at a price equivalent to point C. Make a small<br />

mark. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass. Place point A at <strong>the</strong> mark you<br />

have just made. Keeping point A fixed, pivot <strong>the</strong> PRC<br />

so that point B is at a time equivalent to point A (above<br />

A <strong>for</strong> bottoms, below A <strong>for</strong> tops). Make ano<strong>the</strong>r small<br />

mark. Connect <strong>the</strong> extreme point of <strong>the</strong> move to <strong>the</strong><br />

second mark, and extend <strong>the</strong> line into <strong>the</strong> future. You<br />

have just drawn a 1x1 line to your initial point,<br />

squaring time and price. For 2x1 lines, you can<br />

<strong>the</strong>n multiply <strong>the</strong> setting chosen by 2. <strong>for</strong> 1x2<br />

lines, multiply <strong>the</strong> setting chosen by 1/2. This<br />

technique can be applied to various scales of chart<br />

paper by setting <strong>the</strong> center guide on <strong>the</strong> left hand<br />

scale at <strong>the</strong> ratio of <strong>the</strong> number of price units in a<br />

certain height of chart paper to <strong>the</strong> number of time<br />

units in <strong>the</strong> same length of chart paper.<br />

GANN RANGE SUBDIVISIONS<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r Gann assertion is that certain equal<br />

subdivisions of any important move will provide<br />

levels of support and resistance <strong>for</strong> subsequent<br />

market action. According to Gann, many fractions<br />

were found to be important in this regard, with 1/4,<br />

1/3, 1/8, and 1/16 respectively having <strong>the</strong> most<br />

significance. For example, if <strong>the</strong> previous range was<br />

100 units, <strong>the</strong>n a 1/4 subdivision would result in <strong>the</strong><br />

65


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

conclusion that every 25 unit demarcation would<br />

represent a potential area of support or resistance.<br />

The most widely used range subdivision by Gann<br />

practicioners is that of eighths. The usefulness of<br />

<strong>the</strong> PRC to believers in this method is illustrated<br />

in Figure 45.<br />

Step 1) Set <strong>the</strong> center guide at 2. AB = .50 x CD.<br />

Step 2) Measure <strong>the</strong> wave length with <strong>the</strong> wide<br />

end of <strong>the</strong> PRC. Flip <strong>the</strong> compass. Place point A at one<br />

end and point B at an equivalent point in time to point A.<br />

Mark this point.<br />

Step 3) Flip and contract <strong>the</strong> PRC so that points C<br />

and D fit on <strong>the</strong> smaller length you have marked. Flip <strong>the</strong><br />

compass again. Now AB = .25 x <strong>the</strong> original length.<br />

Step 4) Flip and contract <strong>the</strong> PRC so that points C<br />

and D fit on <strong>the</strong> smallest length you have marked. Flip<br />

<strong>the</strong> compass again. Now AB = .125 x <strong>the</strong> original length.<br />

The subdivisions can be projected into new high<br />

or low price territory <strong>for</strong> levels of resistance or support<br />

as illustrated.<br />

Figure 45<br />

66


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

ERRONEOUS USE OF THE COMPASS<br />

Some people have attempted to find value in<br />

measuring <strong>the</strong> physical length of waves on chart<br />

paper, taking into account both price and time. The<br />

problem with this approach lies in <strong>the</strong> fact that a<br />

physical length as defined above is subject to <strong>the</strong><br />

time and price scales of <strong>the</strong> chart paper which is<br />

used, and thus a retracement or multiple will not<br />

transfer from one type of chart paper to ano<strong>the</strong>r. If<br />

a method is to have significance, it should certainly<br />

not be dependent on chart scale.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong> is <strong>the</strong> perfect tool<br />

<strong>for</strong> projecting ratio-based price and time targets in<br />

<strong>the</strong> financial markets. The <strong>for</strong>emost advantage is a<br />

tremendous saving of time, since you will not have to<br />

calculate price or time distances, write down figures,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n transfer <strong>the</strong> result to your chart. In fact,<br />

you won’t even have to check your records to make<br />

sure of exactly what <strong>the</strong> price levels at <strong>the</strong> turning<br />

points are. The <strong>Compass</strong> knows that when you place<br />

it on <strong>the</strong> chart. The second important advantage is<br />

that you will now have time to investigate all <strong>the</strong><br />

relevant ratio relationships, not just one or two. You<br />

can even experiment with your own special ratio<br />

<strong>the</strong>ories (pi multiples have been suggested). And last<br />

but not least, you will eliminate any possibility of<br />

miscalculation in hitting a wrong button on a<br />

calculator or reading and transferring <strong>the</strong> wrong<br />

number from a chart to <strong>the</strong> keys. The final result<br />

is a quicker and more accurate analysis, leaving you<br />

more time to make trades, with greater confidence<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y’ll be based on complete and accurate<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

67


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

ADDITIONAL CHARTS PRESENTED DURING<br />

CALCULATING FIBONACCI RELATIONSHIPS<br />

Using <strong>the</strong> PRECISION RATIO COMPASS<br />

68


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

69


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

70


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

71


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

72


The <strong>Elliott</strong> <strong>Wave</strong> Educational Video Series — Workbook 7: <strong>Utility</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Precision</strong> <strong>Ratio</strong> <strong>Compass</strong><br />

1-770-536-0309 (outside <strong>the</strong> U.S.)<br />

or 1-800-336-1618 (inside <strong>the</strong> U.S.)<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!