08.04.2015 Views

ISO 11930 – A Comparison to other Methods to ... - ResearchGate

ISO 11930 – A Comparison to other Methods to ... - ResearchGate

ISO 11930 – A Comparison to other Methods to ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COSMETICS<br />

PRESERVATION<br />

Table 18 Test results lotion preservative 5<br />

did not include typical product spoiling<br />

microorganisms alongside the pathogenic<br />

germs as required by the SCCS (7). The<br />

stability of a preservative is not taken in<strong>to</strong><br />

account by <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>11930</strong>.<br />

Formulations passing KoKo or Ph. Eur.<br />

criteria A can be also evaluated as safe<br />

according <strong>to</strong> <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>11930</strong> criteria A.<br />

It is likely that products tested according<br />

<strong>to</strong> CTFA M-3 or M-4 will be safe as the<br />

requirement for a germ count reduction<br />

within seven days is more rigorous than<br />

that of <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>11930</strong> and comparable <strong>to</strong> the<br />

KoKo test.<br />

The ASEAN test is comparable <strong>to</strong> <strong>ISO</strong><br />

<strong>11930</strong>.<br />

The USP 35 can be considered as a weak<br />

standard; the demands are below those<br />

for <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>11930</strong>. It is advisable <strong>to</strong> perform<br />

a test according <strong>to</strong> one of the methods<br />

designed for cosmetics.<br />

References<br />

Table 19 Test results lotion preservative 6<br />

Table 20 Summary experimental data<br />

(1) <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>11930</strong>, Cosmetics - Microbiology - Evaluation<br />

of the antimicrobial protection of a<br />

cosmetic product<br />

(2) Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European<br />

parliament and the council of Europe of<br />

30 November 2009 on cosmetic products<br />

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUri<br />

Serv.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:342:0059:0209:EN:<br />

PDF<br />

(3) European Pharmacopeia 7 th edition, 5.1.3. Efficacy<br />

of antimicrobial preservation<br />

(4) United States Pharmacopoeia (USP 35); 51<br />

Antimicrobial effectiveness testing<br />

(5) Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Preservative<br />

efficacy test for cosmetic product,<br />

Document N° ACM MAL 08<br />

(6) Personal Care Products Council (PCPC - formerly<br />

the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance<br />

Association); CTFA Microbiology Guidelines<br />

2007<br />

(7) Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety<br />

(SCCS), The SCCS's Notes of Guidance for the<br />

Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their<br />

Safety Evaluation, 7 th Revision<br />

Fig. 2 GÖCH results of round robin test including expanded uncertainty<br />

(8) <strong>ISO</strong> 29621, Cosmetics - Microbiology - Guidelines<br />

for the risk assessment and identification<br />

of microbiologically low-risk products<br />

52 SOFW-Journal | 138 | 7-2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!