ISO 11930 â A Comparison to other Methods to ... - ResearchGate
ISO 11930 â A Comparison to other Methods to ... - ResearchGate
ISO 11930 â A Comparison to other Methods to ... - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COSMETICS<br />
PRESERVATION<br />
Table 4 Microorganism counts and the quantity of inoculum used for challenge testing<br />
This would be considered a protective<br />
device for risk reduction (1).<br />
If the formulation meets criteria B, the<br />
microbiological risk analysis shall demonstrate<br />
the existence of control fac<strong>to</strong>rs not<br />
related <strong>to</strong> the formulation; for example,<br />
a protective package such as a pump provides<br />
a higher level of protection than a<br />
schülke KoKo test (Table 6)<br />
If a sample passes criteria A, this means<br />
that even after the sixth inoculation no<br />
microbial growth can be observed, the<br />
product can be considered <strong>to</strong> be well<br />
preserved. From many years of experience<br />
in the use of this test method, if a<br />
product passes criteria A we can state the<br />
microbiological stability of 30 months,<br />
which is recommended for cosmetic<br />
products.<br />
Table 5 <strong>ISO</strong> <strong>11930</strong> / Criteria of acceptance<br />
48 SOFW-Journal | 138 | 7-2012