best available technologies for manure treatment - Baltic Green Belt

best available technologies for manure treatment - Baltic Green Belt best available technologies for manure treatment - Baltic Green Belt

balticgreenbelt.org.pl
from balticgreenbelt.org.pl More from this publisher
06.04.2015 Views

Best Available Technologies for manure treatment baltic sea 2020 Best Available Technologies for manure treatment baltic sea 2020 ANNEX E: TABLES WITH SHORT DESPRIPTION OF LIVESTOCK MANURE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES Best Available Techniques for manure treatment - for intensive rearing of pigs in Baltic Sea Region EU Member States Technical Report "Best Practice Manure Handling, Phase 2" Ref No. 14 Separation by filter pressing Brief description Description of the effect on leaching (positive or negative) of N and P The principle is based on a system where the material is passing a specific type of filter (band filter). This band filter is constantly turning on rollers to make the material moving and to gain pressure on the material, and thereby the liquid part will pass the filter. Often the band filter separation is followed by a screw pressing unit, to increase the dry matter content in the fibre fraction. The band filter is both efficient and has a good capacity, but the investment is fairly high. Band filter Content in fibre fraction Capacity (t/h) N P % of total volume % DM (dry matter) In case the livestock density in an area is the maximally allowed according the Nitrates Directive, the application of livestock manure would typically mean the double of the needs of the crops concerning P. By exporting the fibre fraction to areas with a low livestock density, over-fertilisation and leaching of excess P can be avoided. 8 - 12 29 % 73 % 9 % 35 % NB: Data for band filter is with flocculation, see other table. Innovation stage Research Pilot Practice Major references 1: Nielsen, 2008 2: EU Commission, 2003 Investment price Basic Variable ~ 125.000 1,00 1,50 Condition for leaching reduction effect Scenarios II - V Operational costs per tonnes Certainty of information Prices High Effect on leaching High per kg saved N or P leaching No data Medium Complexity of implementation There are several commercial plants/technologies on the market, and is quite easily to install on the farm if the conditions at the farm are suitable concerning stable systems, storage tanks etc. But the investment and complexity is fairly high, also due to the pre treatment as flocculation. 52 Page 53 52

Best Available Technologies for manure treatment baltic sea 2020 Best Available Technologies for manure treatment baltic sea 2020 ANNEX E: TABLES WITH SHORT DESPRIPTION OF LIVESTOCK MANURE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES Ref No. 15 Separation by centrifuge Brief description Description of the effect on leaching (positive or negative) of N and P The manure is being centrifuged with 3.000 – 4.000 r/minute, so the liquid is separated from the fibre fraction. The fibre fraction is continuously moved out of the drum by a slower rotating conveyer. The centrifuge has high capacity, and good separation efficiency, but fairly high investment. Centrifuge Content in fibre fraction In case the livestock density in an area is the maximally allowed according the Nitrates Directive, the application of livestock manure would typically mean the double of the needs of the crops concerning P. Capacity (t/h) N P % of total volume % DM (dry matter) By exporting the fibre fraction to areas with a low livestock density, over-fertilisation and leaching of excess P can be avoided. 6 20 % 70 % 10 % 30 % Innovation stage Research Pilot Practice Major references 1: Nielsen, 2008 2: EU Commission, 2003 Investment price, Basic Variable Operational costs per tonnes ~ 100.000 1,00 0,70 Condition for leaching reduction effect Scenarios II – V Certainty of information Prices High Effect on leaching High per kg saved N or P leaching No data Complexity of implementation Medium, there are several commercial plants/machines on the market, and is quite easily to install on the farm if the conditions at the farm are suitable concerning stable systems, storage tanks etc. But the investment is fairly high, and also the demands for capacity of flow of material/manure. 53 53

Best Available Technologies <strong>for</strong> <strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> baltic sea 2020<br />

Best Available Technologies <strong>for</strong> <strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> baltic sea 2020<br />

ANNEX E: TABLES WITH SHORT DESPRIPTION OF LIVESTOCK MANURE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Best Available Techniques <strong>for</strong> <strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> - <strong>for</strong> intensive rearing of pigs in <strong>Baltic</strong> Sea Region EU Member States Technical Report "Best Practice Manure Handling, Phase 2"<br />

Ref No. 14 Separation by filter pressing<br />

Brief description<br />

Description of the effect on leaching (positive or negative)<br />

of N and P<br />

The principle is based on a system where the material is passing a specific type of filter (band filter). This<br />

band filter is constantly turning on rollers to make the material moving and to gain pressure on the material,<br />

and thereby the liquid part will pass the filter. Often the band filter separation is followed by a screw pressing<br />

unit, to increase the dry matter content in the fibre fraction. The band filter is both efficient and has a good<br />

capacity, but the investment is fairly high.<br />

Band filter Content in fibre fraction<br />

Capacity (t/h) N P % of total volume % DM (dry matter)<br />

In case the livestock density in an area is the maximally<br />

allowed according the Nitrates Directive, the application of<br />

livestock <strong>manure</strong> would typically mean the double of the<br />

needs of the crops concerning P.<br />

By exporting the fibre fraction to areas with a low livestock<br />

density, over-fertilisation and leaching of excess P can be<br />

avoided.<br />

8 - 12 29 % 73 % 9 % 35 %<br />

NB: Data <strong>for</strong> band filter is with flocculation, see other table.<br />

Innovation stage<br />

Research<br />

Pilot<br />

Practice <br />

Major references<br />

1: Nielsen, 2008<br />

2: EU Commission, 2003<br />

Investment price <br />

Basic Variable<br />

~ 125.000 1,00 1,50<br />

Condition <strong>for</strong> leaching<br />

reduction effect<br />

Scenarios II - V<br />

Operational costs<br />

per tonnes<br />

Certainty of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Prices High<br />

Effect on<br />

leaching<br />

High<br />

per kg saved N or<br />

P leaching<br />

No data<br />

Medium<br />

Complexity of implementation<br />

There are several commercial plants/<strong>technologies</strong> on the<br />

market, and is quite easily to install on the farm if the<br />

conditions at the farm are suitable concerning stable<br />

systems, storage tanks etc. But the investment and<br />

complexity is fairly high, also due to the pre <strong>treatment</strong> as<br />

flocculation.<br />

52<br />

Page 53<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!