best available technologies for manure treatment - Baltic Green Belt
best available technologies for manure treatment - Baltic Green Belt
best available technologies for manure treatment - Baltic Green Belt
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Best Available Technologies <strong>for</strong> <strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> baltic sea 2020<br />
Best Available Technologies <strong>for</strong> <strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> baltic sea 2020<br />
ANNEX E: TABLES WITH SHORT DESPRIPTION OF LIVESTOCK MANURE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES<br />
ANNEX E: TABLES WITH SHORT DESPRIPTION OF<br />
LIVESTOCK MANURE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES<br />
Best Available Techniques <strong>for</strong> <strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> - <strong>for</strong> intensive rearing of pigs in <strong>Baltic</strong> Sea Region EU Member States Technical Report "Best Practice Manure Handling, Phase 2"<br />
Ref No. 02 - 06 Storage facilities<br />
Brief description<br />
Description of the effect on leaching (positive or negative)<br />
of N and P 5<br />
One of the crucial factors in the management of livestock <strong>manure</strong> is the capability to storage the <strong>manure</strong><br />
during the year to achieve the possibility to supply the crops when it is most needed. Examples of storage<br />
facilities are primarily big concrete tanks, where <strong>manure</strong> can be stored (typically capacity of 5oo to 5.000<br />
m3). These storage tanks are very simple, but the level of investment is fairly high.<br />
It is possible to install a tight fitting cover on most tanks, primarily to prevent emission of ammonia and<br />
odour.<br />
For solid <strong>manure</strong>, the storage facilities will be <strong>manure</strong> pits.<br />
By being able to store livestock <strong>manure</strong> safe during periods<br />
of the year where it is not appropriate to spread <strong>manure</strong> in<br />
relation to the need of the crops, as would achieve a<br />
significant reduction in leaching of nutrients to the<br />
recipients. It is very un<strong>for</strong>tunate to spread <strong>manure</strong><br />
especially in winter, since at this point no crops are<br />
growing to absorb nutrients, and nutrients may potentially<br />
be leached.<br />
Also during the summer, it is not appropriate to spread<br />
<strong>manure</strong>, if the sole purpose is getting space in a storage<br />
tank which does not have sufficient capacity and at the<br />
same time no crop with fertiliser needs.<br />
A proper storage management of <strong>manure</strong> will in itself have<br />
a great effect in preventing point source hot spot pollution.<br />
Innovation stage<br />
Research<br />
Pilot<br />
Practice <br />
Major references<br />
EU Commission, 2003<br />
Landscentret, 2005<br />
Investment price 6 , <br />
Basic Variable 8<br />
per tonnes<br />
Operational costs 7 ,<br />
10.000 (small tank<br />
<strong>for</strong> 883 m 3 )<br />
Condition <strong>for</strong> leaching<br />
reduction effect<br />
Scenarios I - V<br />
23 0,0<br />
Certainty of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Prices High<br />
Effect on leaching High<br />
per kg<br />
saved N or<br />
P leaching<br />
No data<br />
Complexity of implementation<br />
Low, the complexity of storage tanks is very low, there is<br />
no need <strong>for</strong> trained staff, no special demands of and there<br />
are plenty of companies on the market.<br />
5 If the effect is validated, then a reference is made – else based on own estimates. Includes quantification of the leaching effect.<br />
6 Rough estimate of the investment price <strong>for</strong> the technology, expressed as 1) a basic price (typically the price <strong>for</strong> the smallest units) + a variable price per extra installed<br />
<strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> capacity. All prices are in €, and including all costs, as well <strong>for</strong> projecting, planning, approvals, occupied land or buildings, etc. There is often an<br />
6<br />
5<br />
economy If the effect of scale is validated, in the investment then a price reference of environmental is made <strong>technologies</strong>. – else based An on approached own estimates. <strong>for</strong>mula Includes to explain quantification this economy of of scale the would leaching often effect. be with the following<br />
syntax: Y=aX + b, where b is the basic investment price and a is the variable price, while X is the capacity in tonnes and Y is the investment price.”<br />
Rough estimate of the investment price <strong>for</strong> the technology, expressed as 1) a basic price (typically the price <strong>for</strong> the smallest units) + a variable price per extra installed<br />
<strong>manure</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> capacity. All prices are in , and including all costs, as well <strong>for</strong> projecting, planning, approvals, occupied land or buildings, etc. There is often an economy of<br />
scale in the investment price of environmental <strong>technologies</strong>. An approached <strong>for</strong>mula to explain this economy of scale would often be with the following syntax: Y=aX + b, where<br />
b is the basic investment price and a is the variable price, while X is the capacity in tonnes and Y is the investment price.”<br />
7 Including consumed electricity, heat, water, chemicals, labour, and other inputs.<br />
8 Per tonnes annual capacity, unless otherwise indicated. For storage capacity the variable investment price is per tonnes size capacity.<br />
7 Including consumed electricity, heat, water, chemicals, labour, and other inputs.<br />
8 “Per tonnes annual capacity or per tonnes size capacity (<strong>for</strong> storage facilities only), unless otherwise indicated.”<br />
49<br />
49