4pQonT

4pQonT 4pQonT

05.04.2015 Views

254 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Pasternak when he was involved in a squabble with other Communists in Moscow. A brief note in the New York Times of September 5, 1945, mentioned that "The Justice Department said it did not plan to drop treason charges against Ezra Pound, American writer held by the U.S. Army in northern Italy. A spokesman said the Department recently had received a memorandum on Pound from military authorities in Italy and added that his case is being studied 'intensively.' A Rome dispatch recently suggested that Pound might be released for lack of evidence." The memorandum referred to was the commandant's request to permit Pound to receive medical treatment, and to learn what disposition was to be made of him. Roosevelt might be dead, but his spirit was marching on. Many people supposed that Pound would be reprimanded for having made the broadcasts, and then released. No one who had heard the talks supposed that he would actually be prosecuted for treason. William Carlos Williams was approached by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and asked to testify against his friend, but the agents never came back. The New York Times reported on November 19, 1945, that Pound had asked Henry Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture, and Archibald MacLeish, Assistant Secretary of State, to be subpoenaed at his trial. He said that he had conferred with them in 1939, and that his purpose then was "to keep hell from breaking loose in the world." Pound had only twenty-three dollars, and he asked that he be allowed to serve as his own defense counsel. The judge replied that this could not be permitted on such a serious charge. In describing his appearance, the Times said, "Pound, onetime Paris dandy, appeared tired and disheveled in court. He wore a dirty GI undershirt, a pair of baggy trousers, and GI shoes that were too large." In a lengthy story in the Sunday edition of November 25, 1945, the New York Times repeated Pound's request to subpoena Wallace and MacLeish, and noted that counsel had been obtained. The story, which was subtitled "His Purpose", said that Pound had told Judge Bolitha J. Laws that he wished Wallace and MacLeish

EZRA POUND 255 to verify his statement that he had come to the United States in 1939 on a mission "to keep hell from breaking loose in the world." The Times reported that "Striving to assure victory in this crucial case, Department experts believe they have the necessary proofs, and by their tactics can jump the legal barriers created by precedents, such as that laid down by the Supreme Court in the treason trial of Anthony Cramer. . . . Much work has been done on the case here and abroad. . . . Incriminating statements have been obtained from Pound." There are some odd phrases in this news story, such as "crucial case". What was so crucial about it, except that the Department of Justice might at last be able to obtain a "Guilty" verdict against one of Roosevelt's critics, after having failed in thirty-two previous cases? The experts planned to "jump the legal barriers created by precedents." Why not shoot him outright? And finally, "incriminating statements have been obtained from Pound." Here we come to the crux of the matter, and the position Pound took that landed him in St. Elizabeths for thirteen years. He has told me on a number of occasions during the past decade that the government lawyers refused to try him for a very simple reason— namely, that he insisted he would stand by every statement he had ever made over Radio Rome. He would repeat his statements about Roosevelt before a packed courtroom and newspaper reporters. Obviously, the government lawyers did not want this to happen. On November 26, 1945, the New York Times announced that seven Italians who said they had seen Pound make anti-Allied broadcasts from Rome and from Milan had flown to the United States "voluntarily" two weeks earlier. On the following day, Pound was arraigned, and his attorney, Julian Cornell, entered a plea of "Not Guilty". Newsweek noted Pound's reappearance in the issue of December 3, 1945: "Behind him in Italy, Pound left a wife, a mistress, two sons and an eighty-six-year-old mother." Pound had only one son, who was serving in the U.S. Army. In its issue of December 10, 1945, Time spoke of him as "the ragbaggy old darling of the U.S. expatriate intelligentsia," and made a very interesting comment: "Jurists, who anticipated the

254 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL<br />

Pasternak when he was involved in a squabble with other Communists<br />

in Moscow.<br />

A brief note in the New York Times of September 5, 1945,<br />

mentioned that "The Justice Department said it did not plan to<br />

drop treason charges against Ezra Pound, American writer held by<br />

the U.S. Army in northern Italy. A spokesman said the Department<br />

recently had received a memorandum on Pound from military<br />

authorities in Italy and added that his case is being studied<br />

'intensively.' A Rome dispatch recently suggested that Pound might<br />

be released for lack of evidence."<br />

The memorandum referred to was the commandant's request to<br />

permit Pound to receive medical treatment, and to learn what disposition<br />

was to be made of him. Roosevelt might be dead, but his<br />

spirit was marching on. Many people supposed that Pound would<br />

be reprimanded for having made the broadcasts, and then released.<br />

No one who had heard the talks supposed that he would<br />

actually be prosecuted for treason. William Carlos Williams was<br />

approached by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents and asked to<br />

testify against his friend, but the agents never came back.<br />

The New York Times reported on November 19, 1945, that<br />

Pound had asked Henry Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture, and<br />

Archibald MacLeish, Assistant Secretary of State, to be subpoenaed<br />

at his trial. He said that he had conferred with them in<br />

1939, and that his purpose then was "to keep hell from breaking<br />

loose in the world." Pound had only twenty-three dollars, and he<br />

asked that he be allowed to serve as his own defense counsel. The<br />

judge replied that this could not be permitted on such a serious<br />

charge.<br />

In describing his appearance, the Times said, "Pound, onetime<br />

Paris dandy, appeared tired and disheveled in court. He wore<br />

a dirty GI undershirt, a pair of baggy trousers, and GI shoes that<br />

were too large."<br />

In a lengthy story in the Sunday edition of November 25, 1945,<br />

the New York Times repeated Pound's request to subpoena Wallace<br />

and MacLeish, and noted that counsel had been obtained. The<br />

story, which was subtitled "His Purpose", said that Pound had<br />

told Judge Bolitha J. Laws that he wished Wallace and MacLeish

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!