4pQonT

4pQonT 4pQonT

05.04.2015 Views

242 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL of Rapallo and signed by sixty citizens of the town, which was sent to Professor Giovannini, October 18, 1948: ". . . It is not true that he took part in Fascist activities in this city. There is no record of his presence at local meetings, nor was he a member of Fascist organizations. He was always considered an American citizen, a friend of Italy, openly sympathetic with certain Fascist principles of a social economic nature and with the struggle against communism which he believed was a danger to the United States themselves. During the war Mr. Pound continued to reside in Rapallo, and from his mode of life it was evident that he did not enjoy privileges, but that he suffered hardships and economic privations. Since it is an evident fact that he never acted from motives of profit, he was able to keep the respect of even those neighbors of his who disagreed with his political opinions. During the long years of residence in Rapallo, Mr. Pound's activity was always artistic and cultural, as illustrated in his writings in literary criticism and political economy. He always conducted himself properly and never engaged in anti-Semitic activity." 8 The fact that Pound was not acting from motives of profit was undoubtedly the cause of much suspicion. George Sylvester Viereck told me that when he was conducting a pro-German propaganda organ in New York in 1915, two government agents visited him and examined his books. They were satisfied that he was being paid a salary for his work, and this seemed a great relief to them. One of them told him, "We had heard that you were doing this because you believed in it, but so long as you are just doing it for pay, it's all right." The New York Times noted on March 8, 1944, that the National Institute of Arts and Letters, which had accepted Pound as a member in 1938, refused to expel him until he had been convicted of the charge against him: "Mr. Pound, like every other citizen of the United States when indicted for a crime, must be presumed innocent until proven guilty after a fair and impartial trial in which he is entitled to benefit of every reasonable doubt arising from the evidence. The Institute, as a national organization, stands for ideas expressed in the Bill of Rights. Until and unless Mr. Pound is convicted by a jury of the charges

EZRA POUND 243 against him, his relationship to and his privileges in our organization cannot be impugned." Mr. Pound is still a member in good standing of the National Institute of Arts and Letters. The charge of treason made against Ezra Pound lumps him with those hirelings who spied against the United States for foreign powers both in peace and in war. Whatever Ezra Pound has done has been done in the light of day, broadcast to the world and signed with his name. There were no secret meetings, no assumed names, no ideological twistings and turnings to suit the needs of the moment or the orders of superiors. "Only the most absolute sincerity under heaven can effect any change whatsoever." Pound's broadcasts were made in conscience, fulfilling his duty as a citizen of the United States as he saw it, and informed by his understanding of the Confucian ethic. Did Pound advocate fascism for the United States? He wrote, in Jefferson and/or Mussolini, that he did not advocate fascism for America. When he came to the United States to lecture against war in 1939, he said, in an interview which appeared in the Capitol Daily, May 9, 1939, "The corporate state is an elaborate and un-American organization." Ezra often said to me, "Knowing what I knew, I would have been a cad not to speak up." After his release, Ezra published an article on one of his later discoveries, Sir Edward Coke. The subject was "Coke on Misprision". "Misprision," wrote Ezra, "is what I would have been guilty of had I not made the broadcasts." 9 According to Coke, he would have been guilty of misprision of treason, had he not gone on the air to warn his fellow citizens against Roosevelt's plan to involve the United States in a world war. Ezra's position has been substantially borne out by Professor Charles Callan Tansill's Back Door to War (1952), Morgenstern's work on the Pearl Harbor massacre, 10 the several Congressional investigations of that atrocity, and numerous other books and articles. In deliberately exposing himself to a charge of treason by making the broadcasts, and risking a possible death penalty, Ezra was acting in accord with the stern New England sense of duty

242 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL<br />

of Rapallo and signed by sixty citizens of the town, which was<br />

sent to Professor Giovannini, October 18, 1948:<br />

". . . It is not true that he took part in Fascist activities in<br />

this city. There is no record of his presence at local meetings, nor<br />

was he a member of Fascist organizations. He was always considered<br />

an American citizen, a friend of Italy, openly sympathetic<br />

with certain Fascist principles of a social economic nature and<br />

with the struggle against communism which he believed was a<br />

danger to the United States themselves. During the war Mr.<br />

Pound continued to reside in Rapallo, and from his mode of life<br />

it was evident that he did not enjoy privileges, but that he suffered<br />

hardships and economic privations. Since it is an evident<br />

fact that he never acted from motives of profit, he was able to<br />

keep the respect of even those neighbors of his who disagreed<br />

with his political opinions. During the long years of residence in<br />

Rapallo, Mr. Pound's activity was always artistic and cultural, as<br />

illustrated in his writings in literary criticism and political economy.<br />

He always conducted himself properly and never engaged<br />

in anti-Semitic activity." 8<br />

The fact that Pound was not acting from motives of profit was<br />

undoubtedly the cause of much suspicion. George Sylvester Viereck<br />

told me that when he was conducting a pro-German propaganda<br />

organ in New York in 1915, two government agents<br />

visited him and examined his books. They were satisfied that he<br />

was being paid a salary for his work, and this seemed a great<br />

relief to them. One of them told him, "We had heard that you<br />

were doing this because you believed in it, but so long as you<br />

are just doing it for pay, it's all right."<br />

The New York Times noted on March 8, 1944, that the National<br />

Institute of Arts and Letters, which had accepted Pound<br />

as a member in 1938, refused to expel him until he had been<br />

convicted of the charge against him: "Mr. Pound, like every<br />

other citizen of the United States when indicted for a crime,<br />

must be presumed innocent until proven guilty after a fair and<br />

impartial trial in which he is entitled to benefit of every reasonable<br />

doubt arising from the evidence. The Institute, as a national<br />

organization, stands for ideas expressed in the Bill of Rights.<br />

Until and unless Mr. Pound is convicted by a jury of the charges

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!