4pQonT
4pQonT 4pQonT
122 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL States, leaving shattered lives and homes in their wake. The inevitable profiteers moved in to take advantage of the publicity, and smuggled or pirated copies of Ulysses brought prices of two hundred dollars and three hundred dollars. One enthusiast paid a top price of five hundred dollars. The basis of this inflation was the book's supposed pornography. Neither Joyce nor Pound received any profits in this trade. Despite the million dollars worth of free advertising (surpassed in American publishing history only by the artificial furor over a dull novel by Bore-us Pasternak), there were not many copies of the book available. When Roth published a hastily-edited and botched version of Ulysses, Joyce was unable to obtain satisfaction in the courts. The New York Times Book Review refused to mention the book, and Burton Rascoe, editor of the New York Herald Tribune Book Review, later tried to squirm out of his guilt in banning mention of Ulysses by saying that he had understood that Margaret Anderson had printed an early version, and that he was waiting for the final draft to appear before criticizing it. As Margaret Anderson says in her autobiography, this is bosh. England's dean of literary critics, the eminent Sir Edmund Gosse, now entered the lists against Joyce, perhaps in remembered anger that he had been "had" by Pound when he was persuaded to sponsor the grant from the Royal Literary Fund. On June 7, 1924, he wrote to Louis Gillet, editor of the influential Parisian journal Revue des Deux Mondes, "I should very much regret you paying Mr. Joyce the compliment of an article in the Revue des Deux Mondes. You could only express the worthlessness and impudence of his writing and surely it would be a mistake to give him this prominence. I have difficulty in describing to you, in writing, the character of Mr. Joyce's morality. . . . he is a literary charlatan of the extremest order. His principal book, Ulysses, has no parallel that I know of in France. It is an anarchical production, infamous in taste, in style, in everything. . . . He is a sort of M. de Sade, but does not write so well. . . . There are no English critics of weight or judgment who consider Mr. Joyce an author of any importance." 6
EZRA POUND 123 Sir Edmund neglected to add that the English critics of weight and judgment at that time consisted of Arnold Bennett, AE (George Russell), and himself. Of these three dictators, dead set against the tide in one of the most brilliant periods of literary history, T. S. Eliot wrote in Horizon, March, 1941, "None of them could lay claim to any authority as a critic." By this he meant that not one of the three had written any body of work that stated a system or theory of literary effort. Gosse's reviews show a limitation of taste that is a parody of the term "Victorian" when used in its derogatory sense. When Oscar Wilde was sent to prison, not only was Gosse among his loudest detractors, but he forbade his house to Robert Ross, one of the few Wilde acquaintances who refused to denounce his friend. Yet Gosse represented the final word in English criticism for many years. With his associates, AE and Arnold Bennett, he could make or break any writer. Pound saw that he was facing the same situation that had driven him from the United States, where The Blue Flower was the poetic gospel of the time. Wyndham Lewis recounts the story of an expedition on which Pound sent him and Eliot in the summer of 1920. Eliot was entrusted with a mysterious bundle, heavily wrapped, which he was admonished to deliver personally into Joyce's hands, and to no one else. Although the emissaries were curious as to what the package might contain, they did not open it. When they arrived in Paris, and delivered it, they sat back impatiently while it was being unwrapped. As he delved through many layers of paper, Joyce was as mystified as the couriers. At last he brought up from the considerable debris a pair of dilapidated brown shoes, which Pound had thought he could wear. At the time, says Lewis, Joyce was wearing a new pair of patent leather pumps, which had been polished to a mirror-like smoothness. 7 Despite his life-long poverty, he had expensive tastes, and whenever he obtained any money, he spent it on living well, a not altogether reprehensible trait. His reputation for extravagance sometimes hindered his friends from helping him, or at least afforded them an excuse. From 1914 through 1924, Pound's name was mentioned in al-
- Page 68 and 69: 72 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL occasi
- Page 70 and 71: 74 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL "1. Di
- Page 72 and 73: 76 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL find a
- Page 74 and 75: 78 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL may be
- Page 76 and 77: 80 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL poems,
- Page 78 and 79: 82 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL with h
- Page 80 and 81: 84 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL articl
- Page 82 and 83: 86 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Xmas"
- Page 84 and 85: V POUND'S LAST effort with group pa
- Page 86 and 87: 90 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL if I k
- Page 88 and 89: 92 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL creatu
- Page 90 and 91: 94 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL proved
- Page 92 and 93: 96 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Poodle
- Page 94 and 95: 98 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL For a
- Page 96 and 97: 100 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL fancy
- Page 98 and 99: VI THE FIRST WORLD WAR was a great
- Page 100 and 101: 104 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Times
- Page 102 and 103: 106 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL natur
- Page 104 and 105: 108 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL had n
- Page 106 and 107: 110 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL belie
- Page 108 and 109: 112 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL but t
- Page 110 and 111: 114 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL "My n
- Page 112 and 113: 116 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Élys
- Page 114 and 115: VII ONE OF POUND'S most fruitful re
- Page 116 and 117: 120 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL part
- Page 120 and 121: 124 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL most
- Page 122 and 123: 126 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL ing,
- Page 124 and 125: VIII "THERE WAS never a day so gay
- Page 126 and 127: 130 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL July,
- Page 128 and 129: 132 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL "I DO
- Page 130 and 131: 134 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL (1926
- Page 132 and 133: 136 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL was t
- Page 134 and 135: 138 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL typed
- Page 136 and 137: 140 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL milli
- Page 138 and 139: 142 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL in at
- Page 140 and 141: 144 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL on th
- Page 142 and 143: 146 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL only
- Page 144 and 145: 148 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL culos
- Page 146 and 147: 150 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Gugge
- Page 148 and 149: 152 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL the F
- Page 150 and 151: IX IN THE 1920s one of the places o
- Page 152 and 153: 156 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL and f
- Page 154 and 155: 158 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL book,
- Page 156 and 157: 160 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL summe
- Page 158 and 159: 162 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL Ezra
- Page 160 and 161: 164 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL pheno
- Page 162 and 163: 166 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL some
- Page 164 and 165: 168 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL ideas
- Page 166 and 167: 170 THIS DIFFICULT INDIVIDUAL "As I
EZRA POUND 123<br />
Sir Edmund neglected to add that the English critics of weight<br />
and judgment at that time consisted of Arnold Bennett, AE<br />
(George Russell), and himself. Of these three dictators, dead set<br />
against the tide in one of the most brilliant periods of literary<br />
history, T. S. Eliot wrote in Horizon, March, 1941, "None of them<br />
could lay claim to any authority as a critic."<br />
By this he meant that not one of the three had written any body<br />
of work that stated a system or theory of literary effort. Gosse's<br />
reviews show a limitation of taste that is a parody of the term<br />
"Victorian" when used in its derogatory sense.<br />
When Oscar Wilde was sent to prison, not only was Gosse<br />
among his loudest detractors, but he forbade his house to Robert<br />
Ross, one of the few Wilde acquaintances who refused to denounce<br />
his friend. Yet Gosse represented the final word in English criticism<br />
for many years. With his associates, AE and Arnold Bennett, he<br />
could make or break any writer. Pound saw that he was facing<br />
the same situation that had driven him from the United States,<br />
where The Blue Flower was the poetic gospel of the time.<br />
Wyndham Lewis recounts the story of an expedition on which<br />
Pound sent him and Eliot in the summer of 1920. Eliot was entrusted<br />
with a mysterious bundle, heavily wrapped, which he was<br />
admonished to deliver personally into Joyce's hands, and to no<br />
one else. Although the emissaries were curious as to what the<br />
package might contain, they did not open it. When they arrived in<br />
Paris, and delivered it, they sat back impatiently while it was being<br />
unwrapped. As he delved through many layers of paper, Joyce was<br />
as mystified as the couriers. At last he brought up from the considerable<br />
debris a pair of dilapidated brown shoes, which Pound<br />
had thought he could wear.<br />
At the time, says Lewis, Joyce was wearing a new pair of patent<br />
leather pumps, which had been polished to a mirror-like smoothness.<br />
7<br />
Despite his life-long poverty, he had expensive tastes, and<br />
whenever he obtained any money, he spent it on living well, a not<br />
altogether reprehensible trait. His reputation for extravagance<br />
sometimes hindered his friends from helping him, or at least<br />
afforded them an excuse.<br />
From 1914 through 1924, Pound's name was mentioned in al-