04.04.2015 Views

Acta kinesiologica

Acta kinesiologica

Acta kinesiologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ACTA KINESIOLOGICA<br />

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KINESIOLOGY<br />

Print ISSN 1840-2976<br />

Catalogued in: COBISS BH<br />

Web ISSN 1840-3700<br />

Indexed in: Index Copernicus<br />

UDK: 796<br />

Indexed in: SPORTDiscus<br />

Indexed in: ProQuest CSA PE Index<br />

Editor-in-Chief: ŽARKO BILIĆ (Ljubuški, BiH)<br />

Executive Editor: DOBROMIR BONACIN (Travnik, BiH)<br />

Scientific Adviser: MIRNA ANDRIJAŠEVIĆ (Zagreb, Croatia)<br />

Consultant: STIPE BLAŽEVIĆ (Rijeka, Croatia)<br />

Young Editor & PR: DANIJELA BONACIN (Travnik, BiH)<br />

Editorial Board:<br />

Marko Aleksandrović (Niš, Serbia), Petr Blahuš (Prague, Czech), Tudor Bompa (Toronto, Canada), Marina<br />

Bulatova (Kyiv, Ukraine), Nadia Carlomagno (Naples, Italy), Michael Chia (Nanyang, Singapore), Milan Čoh<br />

(Ljubljana, Slovenia), Gudrun Doll-Tepper (Berlin, Germany), Vasilij Filimonov (Moscow, Russia), Denis Hauw<br />

(Montepellier, France), Ivan Hmjelovjec (Sarajevo, BiH), Ankica Hošek-Momirović (Leposavić, Serbia), Siniša<br />

Jasnić (Belgrade, Serbia), Bojan Matković (Zagreb, Croatia), Mihajlo Mijanović (Nikšić, Montenegro),<br />

Aleksandar Naumovski (Skopje, Macedonia), Stephane Perrey (Montpellier, France), Vladimir Platonov (Kyiv,<br />

Ukraine), Franjo Prot (Zagreb, Croatia), Izet Rađo (Sarajevo, BiH), Victor Shiyan (Moscow, Russia), Maurizio<br />

Sibilio (Salerno, Italy), Ljerka Srhoj (Split, Croatia), Wlodzimierz Starosta (Warsaw, Poland), Slavko Trninić<br />

(Split, Croatia), Hana Valkova (Olomouc, Czech), Yuri Verkhoshansky (Rome, Italy), Vladimir Zatsiorsky<br />

(Pennsylvania, USA), Marta Zalewska (Warsaw, Poland), Tsvetan Zhelyazkov (Sofia, Bulgary), Milan Žvan<br />

(Ljubljana, Slovenia).<br />

Section Editors:<br />

Quality of life – Anthropology:<br />

Mirna Andrijašević (Zagreb, Croatia)<br />

Dubravka Ciliga (Zagreb, Croatia)<br />

Biomechanics – Fitness:<br />

Siniša Kovač (Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina)<br />

Nusret Smajlović (Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina)<br />

Methodology:<br />

Gustav Bala (Novi Sad, Serbia)<br />

Julijan Malacko (Novi Sad, Serbia)<br />

Quantity methods:<br />

Robert Hristovski (Skopje, Macedonia)<br />

Dragan Popović (Leposavić, Serbia)<br />

Methodics – Didactics:<br />

Vladimir Findak (Zagreb, Croatia)<br />

Janko Strel (Ljubljana, Slovenia)<br />

Training Theory:<br />

Branimir Mikić (Tuzla, Bosnia & Herzegovina)<br />

Vinko Lozovina (Split, Croatia)<br />

Management:<br />

Milan Nešić (Novi Sad, Serbia)<br />

Đorđe Nićin (Belgrade, Serbia)<br />

Sport – New Technologies:<br />

Hazir Salihu (Prishtine, Kosovo)<br />

Munir Talović (Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina)<br />

Secretariat: Nevenko Grbavac (Secretary),<br />

Zvonko Herceg, Vice Nižić, Mijo Pehar,<br />

Stipan Prce, Zvonko Sesar<br />

Advisory Board:<br />

Lenče Aleksovska (Skopje, Macedonia), Duško Bjelica<br />

(Podgorica, Montenegro), Jonathan Bloomfield (Ulster,<br />

Northern Ireland), Manuel Botelho (Porto, Portugal),<br />

Milovan Bratić (Niš, Serbia), Sabahudin Dautbašić<br />

(Sarajevo, BiH), Slobodan Dragičević (Split, Croatia),<br />

Bojan Jošt (Ljubljana, Slovenia), Evgenij Kalmikov<br />

(Moscow, Russia), Mark King (Leicester, UK), Žarko<br />

Kostovski (Skopje, Macedonia), Branimir Kuleš<br />

(Zagreb, Croatia), Vinko Lozovina (Split, Croatia), Ifet<br />

Mahmutović (Mostar, BiH), Predrag Nemec (Belgrade,<br />

Serbia), Pavel Opavsky (Nikšić, Montenegro),<br />

Mohammed Salama (Alexandria, Egypt), Lejla Šebić-<br />

Zuhrić (Sarajevo, BiH), Anatolij Shirjaev (S.Petersburg,<br />

Russia), Ivan Tončev (Novi Sad, Serbia), Milenko<br />

Vuković (Novi Sad, Serbia), Simo Vuković (Banja Luka,<br />

BiH), Galina Zajceva (Moscow, Russia), John Wang<br />

(Nanyang, Singapore).<br />

Print & Web:<br />

’Fojnica doo 71270 Fojnica, Gornjevakufska 13, BiH<br />

DTP & Web preparation: Dobromir Bonacin, BiH<br />

Webhosting: Netdomena doo, Senj – Croatia<br />

Lector (English): Sanela Omerćajić – Tuzla, BiH<br />

Lector (Croatian): Lucija Bilić – Mostar, BiH<br />

Ilustrations: Danijela Bonacin, BSc – Travnik, BiH<br />

Printed: 300 copies<br />

Publisher:<br />

DPTZK Ljubuški, Teskera Put za crveni grm, BiH<br />

Communication:<br />

<strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica International Scientific Journal of Kinesiology – 88320 Ljubuški, Teskera Put za crveni grm, BiH<br />

Tel.: +387 63 325 690, +38739 838 399, +385 62 907 430, +387 30 517 824, Fax: +387 39 838 171, +387 30 517 824<br />

E-mail: zarkob@actakin.com, dobromirb@actakin.com, mirnaa@actakin.com, danijelab@actakin.com,<br />

<strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica publishes twice a year in English with Croatian abstracts.<br />

Cost: 15 Euro, overseas 30 Euro + postal costs.<br />

Journal publishing is granted by Government of Bosnia & Herzegovina Federation.<br />

Full journal text available on http://www.actakin.com


ACTA KINESIOLOGICA<br />

International scientific journal of kinesiology<br />

Vol. 3 (2009), Issue 1 (1-114)<br />

ISSN 1840-3700<br />

Contents:<br />

Dear reader . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

Stipe Blažević<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Some relations between boxer's cognitive abilities and morphological characteristics 7<br />

Franceska D'Elia, Nadia Carlomagno, Michela Galdieri, Raffaele Prosperi, Giuseppe Mantile,<br />

Paola Aiello and Maurizio Sibilio<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Analysis of training needs for teachers to improve teaching activities in primary<br />

schools in the province of Naples (Italy) . . . . . . . 12<br />

Marko Trninić, Vladan Papić and Viktorija Trninić<br />

(Review paper)<br />

Influence of coach's leadership behaviour and process of training on performance<br />

and competition efficiacy in elite sport . . . . . . . 18<br />

Swarup Mukherjee and Michael Chia<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Urinary total antioxidant capacity in soccer players . . . . . 26<br />

Dinko Vuleta and Igor Gruić<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Changes in physical conditioning status of male students of the first year of<br />

Faculty of kinesiology influenced by educational process. . . . . 34<br />

Đurđica Miletić, Ana Božanić and Ivana Musa<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Ambidexterity influencing performance in rhythmyc composition – gender differences 38<br />

Slavica Kozomara and Goran Kozomara<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

The comparement of low leg speed TT resultant at handball jump shots during<br />

rebound and landing, as possible Anterior Cruciate Ligament injury prevention . 44<br />

Dobromir Bonacin, Danijela Bonacin and Žarko Bilić<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Uditax – model of distinct taxons based on distance maximization of<br />

representative entities . . . . . . . . . 49<br />

Joško Sindik, Mirna Andrijašević and Sanja Ćurković<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Relation of student attitude toward leisure time activities and their preferences<br />

toward sport recreation activities . . . . . . . . 53<br />

Journal text is avaliable on http://www.actakin.com/


ACTA KINESIOLOGICA<br />

International scientific journal of kinesiology<br />

Vol. 3 (2009), Issue 1 (1-114)<br />

ISSN 1840-3700<br />

Contents (continuing):<br />

Erika Zemkova, Peter Miklovič and Dušan Hamar<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

There is a relationship between intensity of exercise and reaction time on<br />

laterally concordant and disconcordant stimuli . . . . . . 58<br />

Ismet Bašinac, Branimir Mikić and Behudin Bajgorić<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Game qualities of woman basketball players (agility, reliability and efficiency)<br />

in league games . . . . . . . . . . 63<br />

Ondřej Pecha and William Crossan<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Attendance at basketball matches: A multilevel analysis with longitudinal data . 67<br />

Rodrigo Díaz Fernández, Fernando Mugarra González, Jacek Dusza and Paweł Grabowski<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Usage of PCA for parameterization in vertebral column dynamic examinations . 76<br />

Slavoljub Uzunović, Radmila Kostić and Đurđica Miletić<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Motor status of competitive young sport dancers – gender differences. . . 82<br />

Danijela Bonacin, Dobromir Bonacin and Izet Rađo<br />

(Review paper)<br />

Local and global interaction of sport organization within society . . . 88<br />

Stipe Blažević, Vesna Širić and Žarko Kostovski<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Factor structure of boxer's morphological characteristics . . . . 93<br />

Viktorija Trninić, Vladan Papić and Marko Trninić<br />

(Review paper)<br />

Role of expert coaches in development of top-level athletes' careers in individual<br />

and team sports . . . . . . . . . . 98<br />

Damjan Jakšić and Milan Cvetković<br />

(Original scientific paper)<br />

Neural network analysis of somatotype differences among males related<br />

to the manifestation of motor abilities . . . . . . . 106<br />

Guidelines to authors . . . . . . . . . . 113<br />

Journal text is avaliable on http://www.actakin.com/


ACTA KINESIOLOGICA<br />

Međunarodni znanstveni časopis iz područja kineziologije<br />

Vol. 3 (2009), Broj 1 (1-114)<br />

ISSN 1840-3700<br />

Sadržaj:<br />

Riječ urednika . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

Stipe Blažević<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Neke relacije između kognitivnih dimenzija i morfoloških karakteristika boksača . 7<br />

Franceska D'Elia, Nadia Carlomagno, Michela Galdieri, Raffaele Prosperi, Giuseppe Mantile,<br />

Paola Aiello i Maurizio Sibilio<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Analiza trenažnih potreba učitelje radi povećanja učiteljskih aktivnosti u osnovnim<br />

školama okruga Napulj (Italija) . . . . . . . . 12<br />

Marko Trninić, Vladan Papić i Viktorija Trninić<br />

(Pregledni rad)<br />

Utjecaj trenerovog rukovodećeg ponašanja i procesa treniranja na izvedbu i<br />

natjecateljsku uspješnost u vrhunskom sportu . . . . . . 18<br />

Swarup Mukherjee i Michael Chia<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Urinarni totalni antioksidantni kapacitet kod nogometaša . . . . 26<br />

Dinko Vuleta i Igor Gruić<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Promjene u nekim pokazateljima kondicijske pripremljenosti studenata prve godine<br />

Kineziološkog fakulteta pod utjecajem nastavnog procesa . . . . 34<br />

Đurđica Miletić, Ana Božanić i Ivana Musa<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Ambidexterity influencing performance in rhythmyc composition – gender differences 38<br />

Slavica Kozomara i Goran Kozomara<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Usporedba razlike u rezultanti brzina TT potkoljenice kod skok šuteva u rukometu pri<br />

odskoku i doskoku kao mogućnost prevencije povrede Anterior Cruciate Ligamenta 44<br />

Dobromir Bonacin, Danijela Bonacin i Žarko Bilić<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Uditax – model distiktnih taksona na temelju udaljenosti reprezentativnih entiteta 49<br />

Joško Sindik, Mirna Andrijašević i Sanja Ćurković<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Povezanost stavova studenata prema aktivnostima u slobodno vrijeme te njihove<br />

preferencije prema sadržajima sportske rekreacije . . . . . . 53<br />

Tekst časopisa je dostupan na http://www.actakin.com/


ACTA KINESIOLOGICA<br />

Međunarodni znanstveni časopis iz područja kineziologije<br />

Vol. 3 (2009), Broj 1 (1-114)<br />

ISSN 1840-3700<br />

Sadržaj (nastavak):<br />

Erika Zemkova, Peter Miklovič i Dušan Hamar<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Postoji relacija između intenziteta vježbanja i brzine reakcije na lateralno<br />

usklađene i neusklađene stimuluse . . . . . . . 58<br />

Ismet Bašinac, Branimir Mikić i Behudin Bajgorić<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Kvalitete igre košarkašica (agilnost, pouzdanost i učinkovitost) na<br />

ligaškim utakmicama . . . . . . . . . 63<br />

Ondřej Pecha i William Crossan<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Posjećenost košarkaških utakmica: Višerazinska analiza longitudinalnih podataka . 67<br />

Rodrigo Díaz Fernández, Fernando Mugarra González, Jacek Dusza i Paweł Grabowski<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Korištenje PCA za parametrizaciju dinamičkih pregleda kralježnice . . . 76<br />

Slavoljub Uzunović, Radmila Kostić i Đurđica Miletić<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Motorički status mladih natjecatelja u sportskom plesu – spolne razlike . . 82<br />

Danijela Bonacin, Dobromir Bonacin i Izet Rađo<br />

(Pregledni rad)<br />

Lokalna i globalna interakcija sportske organizacije unutar društva . . . 88<br />

Stipe Blažević, Vesna Širić i Žarko Kostovski<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Faktorska struktura morfoloških značajki boksača . . . . . 93<br />

Viktorija Trninić, Vladan Papić i Marko Trninić<br />

(Pregledni rad)<br />

Uloga ekspertnih trenera u razvoju karijere vrhunskih sportaša u pojedinačnim<br />

i momčadskim sportovima . . . . . . . . . 98<br />

Damjan Jakšić i Milan Cvetković<br />

(Izvorni znanstveni rad)<br />

Neuronska mreža u analizi razlike somatotipova muškaraca<br />

u iskazivanju motoričkih sposobnosti . . . . . . . 106<br />

Upute za autore . . . . . . . . . . 113<br />

Tekst časopisa je dostupan na http://www.actakin.com/


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

NEURAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF SOMATOTYPE DIFFERENCES AMONG MALES<br />

RELATED TO THE MANIFESTATION OF MOTOR ABILITIES<br />

Damjan Jakšić and Milan Cvetković<br />

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

Original scientific paper<br />

Abstract<br />

In order to determine somatotypes and their individual relationship with motor abilities<br />

anthropometric measurements and motor testing were applied on a sample that included 99 male<br />

subjects, all of which were the 7 th - and 8 th -grade students in primary schools in five cities in<br />

Vojvodina. Among the population of the students three somatotypes were identified: astenomorphs<br />

(41.4%), meso-ectomorphs (31%) and endomorphs (25%). In case of motor abilities the best type<br />

turned out to be the meso-ectomorphs who appeared as the dominant ones in all types of motor<br />

abilities assessment, except for in the tests where no difference between morphological types was<br />

observed (Arm plate tapping and Crossed-arm sit-ups). Members of this somatotype are identified<br />

as accelerants and it might be one of the possible reasons for its dominance.<br />

Key words: ectomorphy, meso-ectomorphy, endomorphy, 15-years-old<br />

Introduction and aim<br />

Constitution represents a specific pattern of<br />

structural-morphological, physiologically<br />

functional and psychological cognitive-conative<br />

features of a person which distinguish this<br />

person from all the others (Pende, 1929;<br />

Tucker, & Less, 1940; from: Mišigoj-Duraković,<br />

2008). There has been a lot of interest in<br />

identifying a morph type. The first researches<br />

date back to far in the past, at the time of<br />

Hippocrates, who observed the type<br />

differentiation of the people with respect to<br />

their constitution. The research carried out by<br />

Kretschmer (1926, 1955), and then Conard<br />

(1963) are considered to be the beginnings of a<br />

modern definition of morphological types. Their<br />

findings are based on the aetiology of the<br />

formation of constitutional type.<br />

A somewhat different approach was used by<br />

Sheldon, Stevens, & Tucker (1940) and<br />

Sheldon, Dupertuis, & McDermott (1954)<br />

whose starting point was the hypothesis that<br />

only organic systems, as parts of three types of<br />

development (endoderm, mesoderm and<br />

ectoderm) show a different tendency in growth<br />

and development. In this way, Sheldon et al.<br />

(1940; 1954) proposed a classification<br />

according to the dominance of one of the three<br />

embryonic components. Distinguished<br />

researchers working in our region would<br />

include Saltykow, a pathologist, Škrelj, a<br />

Slovenian anthropologist, as well as the entire<br />

team of researchers gathered around<br />

Momirović. The last-named have provided a<br />

whole series of recommendations.<br />

And have proposed new algorithms which have<br />

their practical implementation only in defining<br />

morpho-typologies. In the paper written by<br />

Momirović, Hošek, Prot, & Bosnar (2003) there<br />

are listed instructions necessary to follow in<br />

order to achieve satisfactory success in defining<br />

of somatotypes. It is said here that it is<br />

necessary to fulfill three fundamental<br />

conditions:<br />

1. it is necessary to choose a sufficient<br />

number of respondents who are representative<br />

of the population, who are of the same sex and<br />

who are undergoing a specific phase of<br />

morphologic development,<br />

2. it is necessary to make a good choice of<br />

anthropometric variables and strictly follow the<br />

technique of measuring, and<br />

3. probably, the hardest condition to fulfill – it<br />

is necessary to make a selection of adequate<br />

taxonomic algorithms; because it is widely<br />

known that cluster problems do not have a<br />

solution in a closed algebraic form.<br />

There are a huge number of such algorithms<br />

today and the biggest problem is the selection<br />

of algorithm, which is necessary to be<br />

discriminative enough to distinguish quality<br />

clusters, with satisfactory efficiency ratio<br />

algorithm, and without the risk of<br />

distinguishing pseudo taxons. Another<br />

important condition and necessary to fulfill is<br />

that the used variables must be normally<br />

distributed, because almost all the<br />

anthropometric variables, except for skin folds,<br />

in any population of any age are normally<br />

distributed.<br />

106


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

Lately, the most up-to date method for defining<br />

somatotypes has been the one according to<br />

Carter (1970, 1984a, 1984b) and especially to<br />

Carter, & Heath (1992), who gave the formulas<br />

abundant in adjustable, regression coefficients<br />

which identified three main constitutional<br />

types, but also defined the mid-types on the<br />

basis of the results obtained by calculating the<br />

implementation of the formula. In addition to<br />

this, in the same publication the same authors<br />

have one whole chapter dedicated to issue of<br />

the relationship between somatotypes<br />

occurring in some sports and how successfully<br />

their motor abilities are expressed. The aim of<br />

this paper is to analyze and point to this issue.<br />

Therefore, the aim of this paper is to identify<br />

constitutional types in the sample of young<br />

males and to determine the differences in the<br />

manifestation of somatotypes in motor abilities.<br />

Methods<br />

The data used in the work were collected within<br />

the scientific project carried out by the Faculty<br />

of Sport and Physical Education -<br />

“Anthropological Status and Physical Activity of<br />

the Population in Vojvodina”, and financed by<br />

the Provincial Secretariat for Science and<br />

Technology. The sample consisted of 99<br />

respondents whose average age was 14.71 (±<br />

0.38) in decimal years, all males and all<br />

students of the schools in Vojvodina, attending<br />

the 7 th and 8 th grade of elementary school. The<br />

sample students were from five cities of<br />

Vojvodina: Novi Sad, Bačka Palanka, Sombor,<br />

Zrenjanin and Sremska Mitrovica. All of them<br />

underwent a battery of anthropometric<br />

measures and motor tests. The applied<br />

anthropometric measures were the following<br />

ones: Body height, Body weight, Chest girth,<br />

Midarm girth, Forearm girth, Abdominal<br />

skinfold, Subscapular skinfold, Triceps skinfold,<br />

Abdominal girth. The above-mentioned<br />

measures are the best manifestation of<br />

morphological latent dimensions: longitudinal<br />

skeleton dimensionality, circumference and<br />

body mass and subcutaneous adipose tissue<br />

(according to e.g. Viskić-Štalec, 1974; Kurelić,<br />

Momirović, Stojanović, Šturm, Radojević, &<br />

Viskić-Štalec, 1975; Stojanović, Solarić,<br />

Vukosavljević, & Momirović, 1975). All<br />

anthropometric measures were measured<br />

following the recommendations of the<br />

International Biological Program formed by<br />

qualified measurers. The motor measuring<br />

instruments included the following battery: For<br />

assessing the speed: 20-m dash, For assessing<br />

the coordination: Obstacle course backwards<br />

and a three balls slalom, For assessing the<br />

speed of alternative movements: Arm plate<br />

tapping, For assessing flexibility: Forward<br />

bend, For assessing the explosive power of the<br />

lower extremity: Standing broad jump,<br />

For assessing the static strength of hand and<br />

shoulder region: Bent-arm hang, For assessing<br />

the repetitive strength of the body: Crossedarm<br />

sit-ups. The above-mentioned tests were<br />

measured following the recommendations given<br />

by Metikoš, Prot, Hofman, Pintar, & Oreb<br />

(1989). In order to determine the<br />

morphological clusters a taxonomic neural<br />

network was used with the code name Intruder<br />

and written in the Matrix programming<br />

language so that it could be performed in a<br />

standard SPSS environment. The algorithm and<br />

a formal mathematical explanation can be<br />

found in Momirović (2001). Having obtained<br />

the somatotypes in this manner, their defining<br />

was carried out based on previous experience.<br />

The differences between somatotypes in motor<br />

abilities were determined using a multivariate<br />

analysis of variance in a complete motor space<br />

and a univariate analysis of variance for each<br />

motor manifestation separately. The<br />

differences between somatotype pairs in each<br />

motor test were calculated using the<br />

Bonferroni’s Post Hoc test.<br />

Results<br />

The tables 1 to 14 show the results obtained by<br />

means of a taxonomic neural network Intruder.<br />

Table 1. Input to hidden layer axons<br />

Variable f1 f2<br />

Body height 0.75 0.35<br />

Body weight 1.02 -0.10<br />

Chest girth 0.17 -0.17<br />

Midarm girth -1.23 -0.89<br />

Forearm girth -0.56 -0.60<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.46 0.29<br />

Subscapular skinfold 0.14 0.17<br />

Triceps skinfold -0.07 0.81<br />

Abdominal girth -0.09 0.05<br />

f = functions<br />

Table 2. Hidden layer to output axons<br />

g1 g2 g3<br />

F1 0.409 0.336 -0.848<br />

F2 0.736 -0.671 0.089<br />

g = groups<br />

Table 3. Initial and classification in the 1.<br />

g1 g2 g3<br />

G1 30 0 1<br />

G2 5 32 1<br />

G3 3 1 26<br />

Table 4. Number of objects and accordance<br />

number progn. accord<br />

g1 31 30 0.968<br />

g2 38 32 0.842<br />

g3 30 26 0.867<br />

107


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

Table 5. Final input to hidden layer axons<br />

Variable g1 g2<br />

Body height 0.27 1.14<br />

Body weight 1.64 -1.15<br />

Chest girth 0.15 -1.03<br />

Midarm girth -1.79 -0.68<br />

Forearm girth -0.32 -0.19<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.83 0.16<br />

Subscapular skinfold 0.02 0.16<br />

Triceps skinfold 0.14 0.94<br />

Abdominal girth -0.04 0.84<br />

Table 6. Final hidden layer to output axons<br />

g1 g2 g3<br />

G1 0.43 0.23 -0.87<br />

G2 0.56 -0.83 0.06<br />

Table 7. Centroids of final taxons<br />

Variable g1 g2 g3<br />

Body height -0.07 0.59 -0.53<br />

Body weight -0.55 0.59 0.17<br />

Chest girth -0.62 0.66 0.21<br />

Midarm girth -0.79 0.38 0.75<br />

Forearm girth -0.76 0.61 0.47<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.44 -0.34 1.00<br />

Subscapular skinfold -0.37 -0.26 0.82<br />

Triceps skinfold -0.27 -0.55 0.98<br />

Abdominal girth -0.59 0.25 0.61<br />

Table 8. Discriminant coefficients<br />

Variable g1 g2 g3<br />

Body height 0.76 -0.88 -0.17<br />

Body weight 0.06 1.33 -1.50<br />

Chest girth -0.52 0.88 -0.19<br />

Midarm girth -1.15 0.15 1.53<br />

Forearm girth -0.25 0.08 0.27<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.27 -0.32 0.73<br />

Subscapular skinfold 0.10 -0.12 -0.01<br />

Triceps skinfold 0.59 -0.74 -0.07<br />

Abdominal girth 0.46 -0.71 0.09<br />

Table 9. Correlations of discriminant functions<br />

g1 g2 g3<br />

G1 1.00 -0.52 -0.61<br />

G2 -0.52 1.00 -0.36<br />

G3 -0.61 -0.36 1.00<br />

Table 10. Structure of discriminant functions<br />

Variable g1 g2 g3<br />

Body height -0.07 0.52 -0.40<br />

Body weight -0.55 0.51 0.13<br />

Chest girth -0.63 0.57 0.16<br />

Midarm girth -0.80 0.33 0.56<br />

Forearm girth -0.77 0.53 0.35<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.44 -0.30 0.75<br />

Subscapular skinfold -0.37 -0.22 0.61<br />

Triceps skinfold -0.27 -0.48 0.74<br />

Abdominal girth -0.60 0.22 0.45<br />

Table 11. Pattern of discriminant functions<br />

Variable g1 g2 g3<br />

Body height -0.06 0.38 -0.29<br />

Body weight -0.34 0.35 0.05<br />

Chest girth -0.39 0.39 0.06<br />

Midarm girth -0.49 0.20 0.34<br />

Forearm girth -0.47 0.35 0.19<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.26 -0.25 0.50<br />

Subscapular skinfold -0.22 -0.19 0.41<br />

Triceps skinfold -0.15 -0.37 0.51<br />

Abdominal girth -0.36 0.13 0.28<br />

Table 12. Standardized discriminant coefficients<br />

Variable g1 g2 g3<br />

Body height 0.76 -0.76 -0.13<br />

Body weight 0.06 1.15 -1.12<br />

Chest girth -0.52 0.77 -0.14<br />

Midarm girth -1.16 0.13 1.14<br />

Forearm girth -0.25 0.07 0.20<br />

Abdominal skinfold -0.27 -0.28 0.55<br />

Subscapular skinfold 0.10 -0.11 -0.01<br />

Triceps skinfold 0.59 -0.64 -0.05<br />

Abdominal girth 0.46 -0.61 0.06<br />

Table 13. Neural network and Fisherian<br />

classification<br />

g1 g2 g3<br />

G1 41 0 0<br />

G2 0 30 0<br />

G3 0 3 25<br />

Table 14. Number of objects and accordance of<br />

classification<br />

number progn. diff.<br />

g1 41 41 0<br />

g2 30 30 0<br />

g3 28 25 3<br />

Based on the results obtained by neural<br />

network Intruder, listed in Tables 1 to 14, three<br />

constitutional types are naturally identified. The<br />

first constitutional type, including 41.4% of the<br />

population of 7 th - and 8 th -grade students, was<br />

identified to be typical of the respondents of<br />

average height, but with significantly reduced<br />

values with respect to the circumference and<br />

body mass, as well as subcutaneous fatty<br />

tissue. This precisely represents their main<br />

characteristic. This group of respondents is also<br />

found by Momirović et al. (2003) and<br />

recognized as an astenomorphic somatotype.<br />

Following the completion of classification, the<br />

second constitutional type including 31% of the<br />

population of 7 th - and 8 th -grade students seems<br />

to be characterized by the above average<br />

values in the field of longitudinal and muscle<br />

mass, with a significantly reduced value of<br />

subcutaneous fatty tissue. This type can be<br />

identified as mesomorphic somatotype,<br />

however, not clearly identified but with a<br />

significant portion of ectomorphic somatotype.<br />

108


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

Yet, the identification has a tendency towards<br />

meso-ectomorphs. The third constitutional<br />

type, which incorporates 25% of the<br />

population, is characterized by the sub average<br />

longitudinal dimensions of the skeleton and<br />

above average amount of muscle mass and a<br />

significant amount of subcutaneous fatty<br />

tissue.<br />

This somatotype is defined as endomorphic. In<br />

addition to this, it must be pointed out that the<br />

efficiency coefficient of Intruder neural network<br />

in this case was 97%, which is by all means<br />

satisfactory, but 3 subjects were not classified<br />

as members of any of the three groups, nor<br />

were they found to form a separate special<br />

taxon of their own.<br />

Table 15. The somatotypes differences in motor performaance tests<br />

Variable<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

Astenomorphy Meso-ectomorphy Endomorphy<br />

f p<br />

20-m dash (0.1s) 39.54±3.67 36.90±2.92 40.48±4.11 7.86 0.00<br />

Obstacle course backwards (0.1s) 138.68±32.10 127.27±22.38 163.22±89.39 3.45 0.04<br />

Slalom with 3 balls (0.1s) 307.80±67.70 286.00±47.73 330.93±65.75 3.77 0.03<br />

Arm plate tapping (freq.) 31.68±3.71 32.03±5.61 29.79±5.63 1.41 0.25<br />

Forward bend (cm) 44.95±8.07 52.03±9.84 45.96±7.99 6.25 0.00<br />

Standing broad jump (cm) 195.41±24.99 210.77±26.20 181.96±31.52 7.96 0.00<br />

Bent-arm hang (0.1s) 444.63±187.28 542.60±232.07 364.50±242.08 4.78 0.01<br />

Crossed-arm sit-ups (freq.) 42.93±7.19 44.57±7.30 41.71±6.87 0.98 0.38<br />

F=1.89 P=0.03<br />

mean±standard deviation; f-univariate f-test; p-significance of univariate test;<br />

F-multivariate F-test; P-significance of multivariate F-test<br />

Table 16. Results of Bonerroni’s post hoc test<br />

Variable ST MD p<br />

I II 2.64 0.01<br />

20-m dash<br />

I III -0.94 0.88<br />

II III -3.58 0.00<br />

I II 11.42 1.00<br />

Obstacle course b. I III -24.54 0.19<br />

II III -35.96 0.04<br />

I II 21.80 0.43<br />

Slalom with 3 balls I III -23.12 0.40<br />

II III -44.93 0.02<br />

I II -0.35 1.00<br />

Arm plate tapping I III 1.68 0.51<br />

II III 2.03 0.37<br />

I II -7.08 0.00<br />

Forward bend<br />

I III -1.09 1.00<br />

II III 6.00 0.03<br />

I II -15.35 0.06<br />

Standing broad jump I III 13.45 0.15<br />

II III 28.80 0.00<br />

I II -97.97 0.20<br />

Bent-arm hang I III 80.60 0.42<br />

II III 178.56 0.01<br />

I II -1.64 1.00<br />

Crossed-arm sit-ups I III 0.96 1.00<br />

II III 2.60 0.52<br />

I – Astenomorphy, II – Meso-ectomorphy, III –<br />

Endomorphy, St = somatotypes, MD = mean difference,<br />

p=probability<br />

The table 15 indicates that in the multivariate<br />

space of motor abilities there are statistically<br />

significant differences between the<br />

somatotypes.<br />

The level of this difference is P=0.025.<br />

Moreover, in the case of the majority of other<br />

motor skills assessed by the applied battery of<br />

tests statistically significant differences<br />

occurred. Only in the tests of Arm plate tapping<br />

and Crossed-arm sit-ups no differences were<br />

found at a statistical significance level. By<br />

means of Bonerroni’s test differences between<br />

two groups were observed. In the first motor<br />

test, 20-m dash, the differences were<br />

statistically significant between astenomorphic<br />

and meso-ectomorphic persons (p=0.009) and<br />

between meso-ectomorphic and endomorphic<br />

persons (p= 0.001).<br />

The Backward Obstacle Course test indicates<br />

statistical significance between mesoectomorphic<br />

and endomorphic somatotypes<br />

(p=0.035). In the Three-balls Slalom test a<br />

difference was found in motor performance, but<br />

also in the previous tests, between mesoectomorphic<br />

and endomorphic somatotypes<br />

(p=0.022). The Arm Plate Tapping test is one<br />

of the two tests in which there is no statistically<br />

significant difference. Another test where no<br />

statistical significance was observed is Crossedarm<br />

sit-ups. In the Forward bend test the<br />

differences were observed between<br />

astenomorphic and meso-ectomorphic<br />

somatotype (p=0.003) and meso-ectomorphic<br />

and endomorphic type (p=0.032). Between the<br />

types of meso-ectomorphs and endomorphs<br />

differences occurred in the Standing broad<br />

jump test at the level of p=0.000 and Bent-arm<br />

hang at the level of p=0.008.<br />

109


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

Discussion and conclusion<br />

Clear identification of three taxons implies that<br />

it is possible to determine which somatotypes<br />

we belong to at any period of our lives.<br />

Approximately at the age of 15 the differences<br />

depend on many external factors such as food,<br />

air conditioning, etc., but most often it depends<br />

on the period when an individual enters the<br />

phase of puberty. Puberty, described as the<br />

most turbulent period in life and development<br />

that male persons enter in the period between<br />

the ages of 12 and 16, i.e. at the age of 14 on<br />

average, according to Mišigoj-Duraković<br />

(2008), seems to have a highly significant<br />

impact on the identification of somatotypes.<br />

In this paper, we identified three somatotypes,<br />

which are practically observed, but which were<br />

not determined on the basis of whether one of<br />

the respondents was an accelerant. Taxons as<br />

hereby defined showed differences in the<br />

performance of certain motor skills. No<br />

differences were found with respect to the<br />

speed of alternative movements of the<br />

dominant hand, which only depends on the<br />

crossing neuro-motor roads in Pons and<br />

prolonged marrow and is not at all related to<br />

somatotypes. In addition, the differences did<br />

not occur, perhaps unexpectedly, in body<br />

repetitive forces. However, when interpreting<br />

these findings we must take into account the<br />

fact that the test was not suitable for this age.<br />

Differences would almost certainly occur if the<br />

modification of the test was directed towards<br />

the maximum performance, or if the<br />

performance time in the test was increased.<br />

In other motor skills the differences between<br />

meso-ectomorphs and endomorphs occurred on<br />

a regular basis. This came as no surprise as<br />

these two types of somatotypes the Carter-<br />

Heat's (1992) chart of morphological types<br />

appeared to be the most distinctive ones. In<br />

addition, the results of all the tests point to the<br />

meso-ectomorphic type, since the fat tissue<br />

accumulation, which is the characteristic of<br />

endomorphy, as well as the reduced body<br />

height value, which implies the delayed<br />

development, undoubtedly represent<br />

aggravating circumstances in the manifestation<br />

of motor abilities. Furthermore, fat tissue<br />

accumulation can be a sign of hypokinesis, as<br />

well as of inadequate food that people in this<br />

region are prone to (Nićiforović-Šurković,<br />

Kvrgić, & Ač-Nikolić, 2002; Obradović,<br />

Milošević, & Srdić, 2007; Milošević, Obradović,<br />

& Srdić, 2007). What is interesting is the fact<br />

that the body mass values are on the side of<br />

meso-ectomorphic taxon, but that mass is a<br />

consequence of the increased value of<br />

circumference, resulting from the quality<br />

muscle mass.<br />

Thus, it is possible to claim that people<br />

classified into this somatotype are either more<br />

physically active or are athletes, which<br />

certainly contributes to a better quality of<br />

motor manifestation. The differences between<br />

astenomorphic and meso-ectomorphic<br />

somatotypes were found with respect to speed<br />

and flexibility, and in both cases they are in<br />

favour of a meso-ectomorphic type.<br />

All this considered, looking back upon the<br />

growth and development stage in which the<br />

subjects are, we may conclude that the<br />

members of meso-ectomorphic type are<br />

accelerants, in the case of which the process of<br />

becoming mature started a little earlier and<br />

where the entire anthropological status<br />

developed somewhat earlier. According to<br />

Tanner (1986), Medved, R., Matković, Mišigoj-<br />

Duraković, & Medved, V. (1989a) and Medved,<br />

Mišigoj-Duraković, Matković, & Pavičić (1989b),<br />

the principal manifestation of a rather early<br />

entry into puberty would be height, or pubertal<br />

Peak Height Velocity (PHV), which can be seen<br />

here as exceeding the average value to a<br />

considerable extent.<br />

On the whole, it is possible to conclude that<br />

taxons identification is clearly obvious. Each of<br />

the three taxons comes with its morphological<br />

characteristics, in the motor space, too. A<br />

remarkably important period in terms of growth<br />

and development of an individual is identified<br />

through somatotypes. However, the identified<br />

somatotypes only modestly look like<br />

Kretshmer’s, Sheldon’s, Momirović’s, Carter-<br />

Heat’s somatotypes. According to Carter-Heath<br />

clear identification is not possible, but it is the<br />

most accurate one. Astenomorphic type was<br />

clearly identified in this sample, while the other<br />

two were not. The second type - mesoectomorphic<br />

type - which proved to be the best<br />

in motor sense was identified, but with the<br />

emphasized height, which is more common in<br />

astenomorphic types. However, characteristics<br />

that make a distinction between mesoectomorphic<br />

and astenomorphic types, i.e.<br />

somewhat greater circumferences and<br />

considerably reduced amounts of sub fatty<br />

tissue, were in this case more dominant<br />

indicating meso-ectomorphy. The<br />

consequences of the increased height were<br />

probably the development periods of the<br />

subjects, which were also found to have the<br />

role of accelerants to a considerable degree.<br />

The third somatotype, astenomorphic type,<br />

observed by Momirović et al. (2003) is also<br />

clearly defined; it includes the largest<br />

percentage of the population and represents a<br />

‘golden mean’ in the manifestation of motor<br />

abilities.<br />

110


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

Literature<br />

Carter, J.E.L. (1970). The Somatotypes of Athletes: A Review. Human Biology, 42, 535-569.<br />

Carter, J.E.L. (1984a). Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes. Part II: Kinanthropometry of Olympic<br />

Athletes. Medicine and Sport Science. New York-Basel: Karger.<br />

Carter, J.E.L. (1984b). Somatotypes of Olympic Athletes from 1948 to 1976. In J. E. L. Carter (ed.),<br />

Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes. Part II. Kinanthropometry of Olympic Athletes, (pp. 80-<br />

109). Basel: Karger.<br />

Carter, J.E.L., & Heath, B.A. (1992). Somatotyping – Development and Applications. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

Conard, K. (1963). Der Konstitutionstypus. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.<br />

Kretschmer, E. (1926). Konstitutionsmischung bei gesunden Ehepaaren. Dtsch. med. Wsc., 20-22.<br />

Kretschmer, E. (1955). Körperbau und Charakter. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer.<br />

Kurelić, N., Momirović, K., Stojanović, M., Šturm, J., Radojević, D., & Viskić-Štalec, N. (1975).<br />

Structure and Development of Morphological and Motor Dimensions of Youth. (In Serbian).<br />

Belgrade: Institute for Scientific Researches of Faculty for Physical Education.<br />

Medved, R., Matković, B. R., Mišigoj-Duraković, M., & Pavičić, L. (1989a). Some Physiological-<br />

Functional Signs in Male Children and Youth at 8 to 18 Years Old. (In Croatian). Medicinski<br />

vjesnik, 21 (1-2), 5-9.<br />

Medved, R., Mišigoj-Duraković, M., Matković, B. R., & Pavičić, L. (1989b). Growth Signs of Male<br />

School Children and Youth at 8 to 18 Years Old. (In Croatian). Medicinski vjesnik, 21 (1-2), 1-4.<br />

Metikoš, D., Prot, F., Hofman, E., Pintar, Ž., & Oreb, G. (1989). Measurement of Basic Motor<br />

Dimensions of Sportsmen. (In Croatian). Zagreb: Faculty of Physical Education.<br />

Milošević, Z., Obradović, B., & Srdić, B. (2007). Body Weight Status Of School Girls. In G. Bala<br />

(Ed.) Proceedings Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference with International Participation<br />

“Anthropological Status and Physical Activity of Children and Youth”, (pp. 81-87). (In Serbian).<br />

Novi Sad: Faculty of Sport and Physical Education.<br />

Mišigoj-Duraković, M. (2008). Kinanthropology - Biological Aspects of Physical Exercise. (In<br />

Croatian). Zagreb: Faculty of Kinesiology.<br />

Momirović, K. (2001). Automatic Classification by Neural Networks. Technical Report, Belgrade:<br />

Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research.<br />

Momirović, K., Hošek, A., Prot, F., & Bosnar, K. (2003). About the Morphological Types of Young<br />

Men. (In Serbian). Glasnik Antropološkog društva Jugoslavije, 38, 29-45.<br />

Nićiforović-Šurković, O., Kvrgić, S., & Ač-Nikolić, E. (2002). Nutrition Knowlege and Eating Behavior<br />

in Schoolchildren and Their Parents in Vojvodina. (In Serbian). Medicinski pregled, 55 (11-12),<br />

465-469.<br />

Obradović, B., Milošević, Z., & Srdić, B. (2007). Body Weight Status Of School Boys. In G. Bala<br />

(Ed.) Proceedings Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference with International Participation<br />

“Anthropological Status and Physical Activity of Children and Youth”, (pp. 89-95). (In Serbian).<br />

Novi Sad: Faculty of Sport and Physical Education.<br />

Sheldon, W. H., Dupertuis, C. W., & McDermott, E. (1954). Atlas of Man. New York: Harper and<br />

Brothers.<br />

Sheldon, W. H., Stevens, S. S., & Tucker, W. B. (1940). The Variates of Human Physique. New<br />

York: Harper and Brothers.<br />

Stojanović, M., Momirović, K., Vukosavljević, R., & Solarić, S. (1975). Structure of Anthropometric<br />

Dimensions. (In Croatian). Kineziologija, 5 (1-2), 193-205.<br />

Tanner, J. M. (1986). Normal Growth and Techniques of Growth Assessment. Clinics in<br />

Endocrinology and Metabolism, 11 (3), 411-451.<br />

Viskić-Štalec, N. (1974). Relations of Regulating Movement Dimensions with Morphological and<br />

Some Energy Regulating Dimensions. (In Croatian). M. A. Thesis, Zagreb: Faculty for Physical<br />

Education.<br />

Received: November 15, 2008.<br />

Accepted: May 26, 2009.<br />

Corresponding author:<br />

Damjan Jakšić, BSc.<br />

University of Novi Sad<br />

Faculty of Sport and Physical Education<br />

Lovćenska str. 16, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia<br />

Phone: +381 (0)21 450 188<br />

E-mail: jaksicd@neobee.net<br />

111


Jakšić, D. and Cvetković, M.: Neural network analysis of somato… <strong>Acta</strong> Kinesiologica 3 (2009) 1: 106-112<br />

NEURONSKA MREŽA U ANALIZI RAZLIKA MUŠKIH SOMATOTIPOVA<br />

U MANIFESTACIJI MOTORIČKIH SPOSOBNOSTI<br />

Sažetak<br />

Na 99 ispitanika muškog spola, učenika 7. i 8. razreda osnovnih škola iz pet gradova Vojvodine<br />

vršena su antropometrijska mjerenja i motorička testiranja u cilju utvrđivanja somatotipova i<br />

njihovih pojedinačnih odnosa sa motoričkim sposobnostima. U populaciji osnovnoškolaca<br />

identificirna su tri somatotipa i to: astenomorfni tip (41,4%), mezoektomorfni tip (31%) i<br />

endomorfni tip (25%). Motorički kao najbolji, izdvojili su se pripadnici mezoektomorfnog tipa koji<br />

su u svim procenjivanim motoričkim sposobnostima iskazali svoju dominaciju, osim kod testova u<br />

kojima nije uočena razlika između morfoloških tipova (Taping rukom i Podizanje trupa za 60 s).<br />

Pripadnici ovog somatotipa identificirani su i kao akceleranti te je i to jedan od mogućih razloga za<br />

izraženu dominantnost.<br />

Ključne riječi: astenomorfija, mezoektomorfija, endomorfija, petnaestogodišnjaci<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!