Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

violence than heterosexuals (4,5,6,7). Statistics also show that children of violent relationships tend to repeat the violent behavior as adults (8). Selfishness is an integral element of non-committed relationships, and especially of homosexual relationships, which tend to be non-monogamous and also based on each partner’s need to exploit the other to “complete” his or her deficient gender identity: Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, a therapist for men seeking to escape homosexuality, describes this attempt at need-fulfillment: “Same-sex attractions will then substitute for the lost masculine within” (9). . As for the remaining character qualities, it is apparent that they are better modeled by two committed individuals of opposite genders, since this is the configuration that allows each partner to apply the greatest amount of effort and inner resources to cooperate with the other partner, whose different gender poses problems in understanding, sharing of perspective and coordinating of genderspecific roles and abilities. The commitment element is especially important here, since it allows all the family members to observe how problems and challenges are worked through, and adjustments fine-tuned, over a long period of time. 1. More about unmarried different-sex couples, paragraph citing research from several sources on the Alternatives to Marriage website, http://www.unmarried.org/statistics.html. 2. http://www.acpeds.org/?CONTEXT=art&cat=22&art=50. 3. Roger Sider, M.D.,“Living Together Risky for Young Women and Children,” Grand Rapids Press January 25, 1999, reproduced in the Divorce Statistics Collection of the website http://www.divorcereform.org/mel/adomesticviolence.html 4. 2004 General Social Survey, Statistics Canada, Canada's National Statistical Agency, July 7, 2005. 5. “A Descriptive Analysis of Same-Sex Relationship Violence for a Diverse Sample,” The Journal of Family Violence, Publisher Springer Netherlands, Volume 15, Number 3, September, 2000, Pages 281-293. ISSN 0885-7482 6. Greenwood, G., Relf, M., Huang, B., Pollack, L., Canchola, J., and Catania, J. (2002). “Battering victimization among a probability-based sample of men who have sex with men,” Amer. J. Pub. Health, 92: (12), 1964-69. 7. Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., Allison, C. (1999). “Comparing violence over the life span in samples of same-sex and opposite-sex cohabitants,” Violence and Victims, 14(4): 413-425. 8. Research on children who suffer family violence: from CAEPV, article summarizing recent research, on http://www.silentwitness.net/sub/latest_reserch.htm#children . 9. Nicolosi, Joseph, Ph.D., “The Meaning of Same-Sex Attraction,” 2008, reproduced in the Documents section of the NARTH website, http.www.narth.com. Redeeming the Rainbow 83
CHAPTER SEVEN: THE PRO-FAMILY ARGUMENT IN NON-RELIGIOUS TERMS Introduction In my experience, pro-“gay” atheists are, ironically, some of the most aggressive and militant moralists in our society. In literally hundreds of public and private debates, I’ve found that they tend to be absolutely convinced of their moral superiority in defense of homosexuality and seemingly unpersuadable by pro-family arguments. Then one day as I was speaking to a group of mostly high-school students in Santa Rosa, California, I was suddenly inspired to try something new. I analogized the pro-family position to environmentalism to show that both philosophies rest on “natural law” presuppositions, and I defined the natural family as the human eco-system. Before my eyes I saw purple-haired and tattoo-covered teens literally scratching their heads, visibly pondering the ideas I had introduced to them for the very first time. It was a major breakthrough. A couple of years later at a debate on same-sex marriage at U. C. Berkeley, I used the same arguments, somewhat more refined, and saw the same effect on these “elite” Leftists. What I learned from these experiences is that pro-“gay” atheists automatically reject any line of reasoning that is rooted in Christianity or the Bible, no matter how thoughtfully you present it. However, if you can explain pro-family reasoning in non-religious terms, they will consider it. This chapter, therefore, is written to show how to restate pro-family arguments in non-religious terms and how this approach benefits the pro-family movement in multiple ways. For example, to the extent that pro-family conclusions are assumed to be exclusively religious, they can be (and are routinely) rejected as a basis for public policy. Like it or not the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment to require government neutrality toward religions – prohibiting favoritism toward the one that is actually true and sensible. However, differentiated from its religious parallel, the pro-family philosophy articulated in this chapter cannot be excluded on legal grounds. This means that teachers, school officials and all other government agents can openly and vigorously promote the pro-family viewpoint stated here- Redeeming the Rainbow 85
Page 1 and 2:
REDEEMING THE RAINBOW A Christian R
Page 3 and 4:
Dedication: This book is dedicated
Page 5 and 6:
Parent/Child: The Natural Extension
Page 7 and 8:
Foreword A Word About Sin I believe
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction Why the Homosexual Age
Page 11 and 12:
Why should the “gay” agenda con
Page 13 and 14:
CHAPTER 1: PRO-FAMILY ANSWERS TO Co
Page 15 and 16:
Q6. What causes homosexuality? A6.
Page 17 and 18:
specifically prohibits such discrim
Page 19 and 20:
Q25. How does the “gay” movemen
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 2 UNDERSTANDING HOMOSEXUALI
Page 23 and 24:
states, “There shall be no whore
Page 25 and 26:
Methodius, bishop of Olympus and Pa
Page 27 and 28:
There is not a single source in all
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 3: The Homosexual War Again
Page 31 and 32:
in an effort to divide and conquer.
Page 33 and 34:
up primarily of two types of people
Page 35 and 36:
uilding in the “mainline” relig
Page 37 and 38:
one example in the Evangelical Luth
Page 39 and 40:
abbis never associated homosexualit
Page 41 and 42: If “gay” theology fosters moral
Page 43 and 44: anity Today, June 12, 2000). The pr
Page 45 and 46: logical presuppositions about sexua
Page 47 and 48: SECTION TWO: THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSE
Page 49 and 50: always lose, step backward a few pa
Page 51 and 52: and other wrong-thinking pagans to
Page 53 and 54: healthy and abnormal is unhealthy.
Page 55 and 56: percent more likely at some point i
Page 57 and 58: of a homosexual lifestyle as an adu
Page 59 and 60: entered into, is a choice made by t
Page 61 and 62: ual. The woman so completely reject
Page 63 and 64: homosexuals,“ and I believe they
Page 65 and 66: WOMEN Extreme Masculinity----------
Page 67 and 68: “Kinsey’s not-very-secret inten
Page 69 and 70: interview, “[we wanted to] keep t
Page 71 and 72: stronger and more intrusive to comp
Page 73 and 74: homosexuality to schoolchildren thr
Page 75 and 76: the GLA’s job, he set into motion
Page 77 and 78: October 26, 2007. “UK Christian C
Page 79 and 80: don’t want co-existence, they wan
Page 81 and 82: Having a relatively small number of
Page 83 and 84: pro-family advocates begin to think
Page 85 and 86: 1. The natural family, consisting o
Page 87 and 88: 2. Men and women are psychologicall
Page 89 and 90: Task sharing is seen by the child a
Page 91: counterpart as self-control is incr
Page 95 and 96: ad results. Surprisingly, the other
Page 97 and 98: The Natural Family, Marriage and Fa
Page 99 and 100: irths, of single-parent households,
Page 101 and 102: children born from these relationsh
Page 103 and 104: Conclusion The preceding argument c
Page 105 and 106: Agenda? What “Gay” Agenda? One
Page 107 and 108: associated with male and female hom
Page 109 and 110: the property and this is his sole r
Page 111 and 112: controlled religious denomination s
Page 113 and 114: to add the qualifier “rational”
Page 115 and 116: validity upon the theory of sexual
Page 117 and 118: You: “Now we’re back where we s
Page 119 and 120: Hope for Pro-Family Advocates I wil
Page 121 and 122: The Triangle of Tolerance “Gay”
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 9: Not A Theocracy: A Chris
Page 125 and 126: Christian conservatives and humanis
Page 127 and 128: deploy the members of your team, se
Page 129 and 130: parade organizers to exclude those
Page 131 and 132: Sixth: Train Youth as Missionaries
Page 133 and 134: The Pro-Family Agenda Our agenda is
Page 135 and 136: To reiterate, each member of the te
Page 137 and 138: “Gay” employee groups work cont
Page 139 and 140: The Government Team Goal: the promo
Page 141 and 142: egarding spending money on election
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 11: Christianizing the Soci
Page 145 and 146:
The Realm of Compromise This is not
Page 147 and 148:
library. 2) Gather documentation fo
Page 149 and 150:
including apologetics, critical thi
Page 151 and 152:
1) Start a school-oriented prayer g
Page 153 and 154:
Action Checklist A. Form an Intra-D
Page 155 and 156:
a working paper for projects undert
Page 157 and 158:
SECTION FOUR: RESOURCES Redeeming t
Page 159 and 160:
Is Hating “Haters” Hateful? Hat
Page 161 and 162:
Requiem for the Magna Carta One of
Page 163 and 164:
Masculine Christianity Scripture te
Page 165 and 166:
Matthew Shepard: The Horst Wessel o
Page 167 and 168:
A Letter to the Lithuanian People (
Page 169 and 170:
Riga Declaration on Religious Freed
Page 171 and 172:
their manifestation does not distur
Page 173 and 174:
THE DANGER OF “SAFE SCHOOLS” Li
Page 175 and 176:
This is not to deny the "scientific
Page 177 and 178:
In contrast, civility, a component
Page 179 and 180:
YOUTH SUICIDE USED AS “GAY” REC
Page 181 and 182:
2. Learn Your Duty The church has f
Page 183 and 184:
The church has a harder job teachin
Page 185 and 186:
Europe and Russia are suffering cal
Page 187 and 188:
Model “Family First” Ordinance
Page 189 and 190:
Model “Dale Clause” to Protect
Page 191 and 192:
Introduction Honoring diversity is
Page 193 and 194:
ONE WAY OF LOOKING AT YOU: AS A MEM
Page 195 and 196:
Looking at You as an Individual Obv
Page 197 and 198:
following ways of reacting: 1) Peop
Page 199 and 200:
If I respect you as a person with a
Page 201 and 202:
The Quality: What It Is 1. Trustwor
Page 203 and 204:
Common Sense Can Help Us Find Commo
Page 205 and 206:
Model Student Opt-Out Notice To the
Page 207 and 208:
THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO By Michael
Page 209 and 210:
The 1972 Gay Rights Platform Platfo
Page 211 and 212:
Repeal of Department of Defense dir
Page 213 and 214:
The Overhauling of Straight America
Page 215 and 216:
A media campaign to promote the Gay
Page 217 and 218:
shows. Daytime talk shows also rema
Page 219 and 220:
573) Sexual Sadism - the intentiona
Page 221 and 222:
Why Government Should Actively Prom
Page 223 and 224:
19. Government should adopt a polic
Page 225 and 226:
Fact Sheet on Same Sex Attraction a
Page 227 and 228:
Haworth Press, 173. (6) Gary Remafe
Page 229 and 230:
criticizing them.) Kinsey has been
Page 231 and 232:
Documentation in Support of the Ass
Page 233 and 234:
uled that because same-sex marriage
Page 235 and 236:
Adoption of children to homosexual
Page 237:
A Missionary to the Pro-Family Move
show all

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?