Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Our scale is getting a little crowded, so we will divide it by gender, but it remains the same scale for both females and males. WOMEN Extreme Masculinity-------------------( GN )---------------------Extreme Femininity (FTS) (FTV) (MFH) Lesbian Fems (LF) MEN Extreme Masculinity-------------------( GN )---------------------Extreme Femininity ”Gay” Bullies (EMH) (MTV) (MTS) The Hidden Sexual “Minorities” So far on our scale of gender imbalance we have plotted the “sexual minorities” that are most visible in our society, but there is another full side to the spectrum that is not as obvious to the casual observer. This side includes the categories of gender disorder in which the individuals are afflicted with an absence of the gender qualities associated with the opposite sex: men with too little of the feminine, and women with too little of the masculine. “GAY” BULLIES AND LESBIAN SISSIES Masculine Homosexual Men, AKA “Gay” Bullies. Moving toward the opposite extreme of the scale, the male categories are measured by their degree of rejection of females and femininity. These are masculine-oriented homosexual men. The existence of this type of homosexual comes as a shock to some people. When they think of homosexuals, they think of effeminate men who act like women, but, in my observation, there are at least as many masculine-leaning homosexuals as there are effeminate ones. But these are not simply masculine men, they are anti-feminine men. Importantly, they are less against women per se than against effeminacy -- especially in other men. The further one tends to the masculine extreme, the greater his rejection of and hostility towards effeminacy. (In my observation, effeminate homosexuality and transgenderism seems to be a product of childhood gender identity disorder as described above, while masculine-oriented homosexuality in men seems to be a product of childhood or adolescent sexual abuse.) The first category therefore is the classic “gay” bully, and his victims are often effeminate homosexuals. It is very common to hear “gay” activists refer to these “gay bashers” as “latent Redeeming the Rainbow 53
homosexuals,“ and I believe they are correct, though I suspect that many of these men are not latent, but active (though often self-loathing) homosexuals. Lesbian Fems, AKA “Lipstick Lesbians” Gender imbalance, when it crosses the line from gender normalcy, is not just an overabundance of the qualities of one gender. As we observed above, it is also a rejection of the complimentary qualities of the opposite gender. This results in an unhealthy manifestation of the remaining gender qualities. In men it is most obvious in the level of aggression. In women, it is most obvious in the approach to interpersonal relationships. The greater the imbalance toward the feminine extreme, the greater the degree of emotional dependence on other people, especially the romantic partner or partners. This is often reflected in intense jealousy and possessiveness among lesbian partners, leading frequently to domestic violence. “Lipstick lesbians” are lesbians who want to appear feminine, but who don’t want to be romantically or sexually involved with men. As with the men who occupy a parallel position on the male scale, the “gay” bullies, they tend to blend into society. No one really notices a lesbian who is dressing and acting like a woman, or a “gay” man who is dressing and acting like a man. These are the “invisible” homosexuals who, if they are activist-minded, often can play the part of secret agents in the pursuit of “gay” political goals. No one knows they are homosexual unless they intentionally reveal themselves. These women commonly enter “heterosexual mimicking” relationships with “butch” lesbians, who take the role of the man. SUPER-MACHOS AND MONSTERS, DOORMATS AND SLAVES Super-Machos Along with a rejection of effeminacy, comes a loss of the feminine-associated qualities that serve to moderate male behavior. The less influenced a man is by these moderating qualities, the more aggressive, even brutal he becomes. This is not to say that gender normal men cannot be “ultra-masculine.” Some are, but usually their attraction to women creates an incentive for these men to moderate their behavior to be more acceptable to women (the characters often played by the actor John Wayne come to mind here). In contrast, Super-Machos are both ultra-masculine and anti-feminine to the point of misogyny. They actively reject the moderating influences of the feminine as weakness and cultivate a persona of brutal forcefulness. The best examples of this type were the male homosexuals of the Nazi Sturmabteilung, also known as the Brownshirts. Many people wonder how the Nazis could have been homosexual, when homosexuals were among the targets of their brutal social engineering policies. The secret is that many of the Nazi leaders were masculine-oriented homosexuals, while many of their political enemies in the German Communist Party were effeminate homosexuals. A brief summary of the homosexual movement in Germany is in order. Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, the German “grandfather of gay rights,” was an effeminate homosexual who invented the “third sex” theory of homosexuality in the 1860’s. This theory, which held that all homosexual men were really women trapped inside men’s bodies, provided the philosophical foundation for the Redeeming the Rainbow 54
Page 1 and 2:
REDEEMING THE RAINBOW A Christian R
Page 3 and 4:
Dedication: This book is dedicated
Page 5 and 6:
Parent/Child: The Natural Extension
Page 7 and 8:
Foreword A Word About Sin I believe
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction Why the Homosexual Age
Page 11 and 12: Why should the “gay” agenda con
Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER 1: PRO-FAMILY ANSWERS TO Co
Page 15 and 16: Q6. What causes homosexuality? A6.
Page 17 and 18: specifically prohibits such discrim
Page 19 and 20: Q25. How does the “gay” movemen
Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 2 UNDERSTANDING HOMOSEXUALI
Page 23 and 24: states, “There shall be no whore
Page 25 and 26: Methodius, bishop of Olympus and Pa
Page 27 and 28: There is not a single source in all
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 3: The Homosexual War Again
Page 31 and 32: in an effort to divide and conquer.
Page 33 and 34: up primarily of two types of people
Page 35 and 36: uilding in the “mainline” relig
Page 37 and 38: one example in the Evangelical Luth
Page 39 and 40: abbis never associated homosexualit
Page 41 and 42: If “gay” theology fosters moral
Page 43 and 44: anity Today, June 12, 2000). The pr
Page 45 and 46: logical presuppositions about sexua
Page 47 and 48: SECTION TWO: THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSE
Page 49 and 50: always lose, step backward a few pa
Page 51 and 52: and other wrong-thinking pagans to
Page 53 and 54: healthy and abnormal is unhealthy.
Page 55 and 56: percent more likely at some point i
Page 57 and 58: of a homosexual lifestyle as an adu
Page 59 and 60: entered into, is a choice made by t
Page 61: ual. The woman so completely reject
Page 65 and 66: WOMEN Extreme Masculinity----------
Page 67 and 68: “Kinsey’s not-very-secret inten
Page 69 and 70: interview, “[we wanted to] keep t
Page 71 and 72: stronger and more intrusive to comp
Page 73 and 74: homosexuality to schoolchildren thr
Page 75 and 76: the GLA’s job, he set into motion
Page 77 and 78: October 26, 2007. “UK Christian C
Page 79 and 80: don’t want co-existence, they wan
Page 81 and 82: Having a relatively small number of
Page 83 and 84: pro-family advocates begin to think
Page 85 and 86: 1. The natural family, consisting o
Page 87 and 88: 2. Men and women are psychologicall
Page 89 and 90: Task sharing is seen by the child a
Page 91 and 92: counterpart as self-control is incr
Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER SEVEN: THE PRO-FAMILY ARGUM
Page 95 and 96: ad results. Surprisingly, the other
Page 97 and 98: The Natural Family, Marriage and Fa
Page 99 and 100: irths, of single-parent households,
Page 101 and 102: children born from these relationsh
Page 103 and 104: Conclusion The preceding argument c
Page 105 and 106: Agenda? What “Gay” Agenda? One
Page 107 and 108: associated with male and female hom
Page 109 and 110: the property and this is his sole r
Page 111 and 112: controlled religious denomination s
Page 113 and 114:
to add the qualifier “rational”
Page 115 and 116:
validity upon the theory of sexual
Page 117 and 118:
You: “Now we’re back where we s
Page 119 and 120:
Hope for Pro-Family Advocates I wil
Page 121 and 122:
The Triangle of Tolerance “Gay”
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 9: Not A Theocracy: A Chris
Page 125 and 126:
Christian conservatives and humanis
Page 127 and 128:
deploy the members of your team, se
Page 129 and 130:
parade organizers to exclude those
Page 131 and 132:
Sixth: Train Youth as Missionaries
Page 133 and 134:
The Pro-Family Agenda Our agenda is
Page 135 and 136:
To reiterate, each member of the te
Page 137 and 138:
“Gay” employee groups work cont
Page 139 and 140:
The Government Team Goal: the promo
Page 141 and 142:
egarding spending money on election
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 11: Christianizing the Soci
Page 145 and 146:
The Realm of Compromise This is not
Page 147 and 148:
library. 2) Gather documentation fo
Page 149 and 150:
including apologetics, critical thi
Page 151 and 152:
1) Start a school-oriented prayer g
Page 153 and 154:
Action Checklist A. Form an Intra-D
Page 155 and 156:
a working paper for projects undert
Page 157 and 158:
SECTION FOUR: RESOURCES Redeeming t
Page 159 and 160:
Is Hating “Haters” Hateful? Hat
Page 161 and 162:
Requiem for the Magna Carta One of
Page 163 and 164:
Masculine Christianity Scripture te
Page 165 and 166:
Matthew Shepard: The Horst Wessel o
Page 167 and 168:
A Letter to the Lithuanian People (
Page 169 and 170:
Riga Declaration on Religious Freed
Page 171 and 172:
their manifestation does not distur
Page 173 and 174:
THE DANGER OF “SAFE SCHOOLS” Li
Page 175 and 176:
This is not to deny the "scientific
Page 177 and 178:
In contrast, civility, a component
Page 179 and 180:
YOUTH SUICIDE USED AS “GAY” REC
Page 181 and 182:
2. Learn Your Duty The church has f
Page 183 and 184:
The church has a harder job teachin
Page 185 and 186:
Europe and Russia are suffering cal
Page 187 and 188:
Model “Family First” Ordinance
Page 189 and 190:
Model “Dale Clause” to Protect
Page 191 and 192:
Introduction Honoring diversity is
Page 193 and 194:
ONE WAY OF LOOKING AT YOU: AS A MEM
Page 195 and 196:
Looking at You as an Individual Obv
Page 197 and 198:
following ways of reacting: 1) Peop
Page 199 and 200:
If I respect you as a person with a
Page 201 and 202:
The Quality: What It Is 1. Trustwor
Page 203 and 204:
Common Sense Can Help Us Find Commo
Page 205 and 206:
Model Student Opt-Out Notice To the
Page 207 and 208:
THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO By Michael
Page 209 and 210:
The 1972 Gay Rights Platform Platfo
Page 211 and 212:
Repeal of Department of Defense dir
Page 213 and 214:
The Overhauling of Straight America
Page 215 and 216:
A media campaign to promote the Gay
Page 217 and 218:
shows. Daytime talk shows also rema
Page 219 and 220:
573) Sexual Sadism - the intentiona
Page 221 and 222:
Why Government Should Actively Prom
Page 223 and 224:
19. Government should adopt a polic
Page 225 and 226:
Fact Sheet on Same Sex Attraction a
Page 227 and 228:
Haworth Press, 173. (6) Gary Remafe
Page 229 and 230:
criticizing them.) Kinsey has been
Page 231 and 232:
Documentation in Support of the Ass
Page 233 and 234:
uled that because same-sex marriage
Page 235 and 236:
Adoption of children to homosexual
Page 237:
A Missionary to the Pro-Family Move
show all

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?