Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

healthy and abnormal is unhealthy. The truth of this assumption would seem obvious, based on
simple observation. Indeed, advocates of the “gay” lifestyle reveal that they implicitly agree with the
assumption by arguing that homosexuality is innate and unchangeable. This is in fact their primary
argument.
You don’t need much scientific support to confirm the obvious (a small sample is offered
below), but if you’re trying to contradict the obvious, you need a lot. Unfortunately for the
advocates of the “gay is normal” perspective, and contrary to common belief, there is very little for
them to rely upon, and that which exists is unreliable.
Dr. Jeffrey Satinover is one of the leading scholars in America on the subject of homosexuality,
and a prominent member of the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality
(NARTH). A true renaissance man, Dr. Satinover (a medical doctor) wrote an article titled
The Trojan Couch: How the Mental Health Associations Misrepresent Science, while simultaneously teaching
constitutional law at Princeton and physics at Yale! (A summary of the article is published as a
resource in Section Four of this book under the title The Falsification of Evidence Regarding Homosexuality
by Mental Health Associations.) Satinover’s article is an analysis of the scientific claims which advocates
of the “gay” community used to win two critical pro-homosexual rulings at the United States
Supreme Court: Lawrence v. Texas and Romer v. Evans. He demonstrates quite conclusively that the
most important pro-”gay” studies used to support the proposition that homosexuality is not disordered
are fraudulent.
Importantly, much of the data used to mislead the court is the same data that has been used
to mislead the public for decades. For example, he shows that Evelyn Hooker’s 1957 study, The
Adjustment of the Overt Male Homosexual (the only paper cited in detail on the main website of the
American Psychological Association regarding homosexual issues), was unscientifically designed to
prove the point that homosexual men did not differ from heterosexual men in psychopathology. She
used only 30 subjects from each group, eliminated any subjects who were in psychiatric therapy,
administered (without professional expertise) three standardized diagnostic tests and discarded the
results of two of them (because she didn’t like the results), and in the remaining test used her own
personal criteria to evaluate results rather than the reliable standardized test norms. Hooker was also
an ideologue, a lifelong champion of “gay” causes. Yet this study is the foundation-stone of the “science”
supporting the “gay is normal” argument, and is still the primary study used to justify the 1973 decision
of the APA to remove homosexuality from the list of mental disorders in its Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual (DSM IV) (ibid.).
Additional, heavily-cited “proof” of “gay” normalcy is drawn from the work of Dr. Alfred
Kinsey. However, Kinsey is widely recognized today as a scientific fraud (due primarily to the
tireless efforts of Dr. Judith Reisman, who has made the exposure of Kinsey‘s duplicity to the public
-- and its destructive social consequences -- a major part of her life’s work). Satinover notes that
Kinsey has been discredited because of his unscientific selection of sample groups (he used prison
inmates and sex offenders for subjects), his badgering and bribing of subjects, and above all because
of his mission to socially legitimize aberrant sexual practices: homosexuality, pedophilia, incest and
bestiality. Kinsey had homosexual relationships with several of his associates and may also have
practiced pedophilia (certainly his experiments on children amounted to child molestation). His
surviving associates have continued to campaign for the normalization of these practices (ibid.).
Satinover shows that the rest of the scientific support for “gay normalcy” used to mislead the
Redeeming the Rainbow 44