04.04.2015 Views

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Model “Dale Clause” to Protect Pro-Family<br />

Organizations in the United States from Litigation<br />

Under the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, private organizations, within<br />

their First Amendment right of “expressive association,” may refuse membership to open homosexuals.<br />

This right may only be upheld by a court, however, if the organization has clearly stated a policy<br />

that homosexual conduct is incompatible with the expressive activity of the organization. The<br />

majority in Dale interpreted the Boy Scouts policy requiring scouts to remain “clean” and “morally<br />

straight” to exclude homosexuals, but a strong dissent emphasized that the Boy Scouts’ policy<br />

regarding homosexuality was not specific enough to warrant a ruling in its favor.<br />

We believe, therefore, that every pro-family group that wishes to preserve its right to exclude open<br />

homosexuals should immediately amend its by-laws to add a “Dale Clause” similar to the following:<br />

It is the official policy of this organization that homosexual conduct is incompatible<br />

with our operation, purpose and expressive message. We reject the notion that homosexuality<br />

is a legitimate form of behavior and we do so both on religious and<br />

nonreligious grounds. On religious grounds we oppose homosexuality as a sin that<br />

violates God’s standard for human sexual expression as defined in the Holy Bible.<br />

On nonreligious grounds we oppose homosexuality as objectively disordered and<br />

contrary to the self-evident heterosexual design of the human body.<br />

While the Dale case unequivocally protects the right of private association regarding group membership,<br />

it is less clear whether Dale protects your rights as an employer to exclude homosexuals as<br />

employees. It seems reasonable that the choice of whom to employ affects “expressive association” to<br />

the same or greater extent as the choice of whom to allow as a member, but this may need to be<br />

clarified by litigation. Please consult with your regular legal counsel in this matter.<br />

Redeeming the Rainbow 183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!