Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance
Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance
Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Model “Dale Clause” to Protect Pro-Family<br />
Organizations in the United States from Litigation<br />
Under the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, private organizations, within<br />
their First Amendment right of “expressive association,” may refuse membership to open homosexuals.<br />
This right may only be upheld by a court, however, if the organization has clearly stated a policy<br />
that homosexual conduct is incompatible with the expressive activity of the organization. The<br />
majority in Dale interpreted the Boy Scouts policy requiring scouts to remain “clean” and “morally<br />
straight” to exclude homosexuals, but a strong dissent emphasized that the Boy Scouts’ policy<br />
regarding homosexuality was not specific enough to warrant a ruling in its favor.<br />
We believe, therefore, that every pro-family group that wishes to preserve its right to exclude open<br />
homosexuals should immediately amend its by-laws to add a “Dale Clause” similar to the following:<br />
It is the official policy of this organization that homosexual conduct is incompatible<br />
with our operation, purpose and expressive message. We reject the notion that homosexuality<br />
is a legitimate form of behavior and we do so both on religious and<br />
nonreligious grounds. On religious grounds we oppose homosexuality as a sin that<br />
violates God’s standard for human sexual expression as defined in the Holy Bible.<br />
On nonreligious grounds we oppose homosexuality as objectively disordered and<br />
contrary to the self-evident heterosexual design of the human body.<br />
While the Dale case unequivocally protects the right of private association regarding group membership,<br />
it is less clear whether Dale protects your rights as an employer to exclude homosexuals as<br />
employees. It seems reasonable that the choice of whom to employ affects “expressive association” to<br />
the same or greater extent as the choice of whom to allow as a member, but this may need to be<br />
clarified by litigation. Please consult with your regular legal counsel in this matter.<br />
Redeeming the Rainbow 183