Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance
Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance
Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
identity for various reasons. But because being "gay" is a purely subjective self-identification with a<br />
sexual identity, it is within the behavioral potential of every person to become "gay" under the right<br />
circumstances.<br />
Obviously, impressionable children are more susceptible to this possibility, especially those children<br />
who are confused about what constitutes normal gender or family relations due to their own<br />
dsyfunctional home life. This is one of the most alarming aspects of "Safe Schools."<br />
A second hidden assumption in the "born that way" argument is that a biological cause for homosexuality<br />
would automatically grant legitimacy to homosexual conduct.<br />
This is simply absurd. Identifying a biological cause of harmful behavior neither justifies the behavior<br />
nor overrides the public interest in discouraging threats to public health and safety. One has only to<br />
consider the biologically-influenced condition of alcoholism to recognize this truth. Alcoholism is a<br />
behavioral problem which is said to have a biological cause, yet no one suggests that our laws should<br />
be changed to normalize it. Society rightly discourages the alcoholic lifestyle despite the belief that<br />
some people are biologically predisposed to alcoholism.<br />
7) "Safe Schools" intrudes upon the most sacred domain of parents, which is their right and privilege<br />
to instill their personal moral and religious values in their children. The right of parents to direct the<br />
education of their children has been recognized by the Supreme Court as a fundamental constitutional<br />
right. This right carries even greater weight when the question involves ideas about marriage and<br />
family life, which are independently protected under the constitution.<br />
Yet "Safe Schools" presumes to empower school officials to override parental interests.<br />
8) "Safe Schools" disregards and marginalizes all who disagree with the "gay" position. Despite the<br />
fact that society leans to the pro-family position on most questions surrounding the homosexual<br />
controversy, the "Safe Schools" program openly sides with the smaller pro-"gay" faction while<br />
characterizing the pro-family faction as an insignificant and unreasonable minority.<br />
Pro-family arguments, when they are not suppressed <strong>entire</strong>ly, are unfairly represented to students.<br />
9) "Safe Schools" proponents routinely equate opposition to homosexuality with racism to justify<br />
their pro-"gay" bias, but deliberately hide the fatal weaknesses in this analogy. The most glaring<br />
weakness is that ethnicity is completely morally neutral while homosexuality involves voluntary<br />
moral choices of serious consequence.<br />
10) "Safe Schools" teaches "diversity" instead of civility. "Diversity" is a segregationist political<br />
doctrine which holds that people's rights derive from their status in a group rather than from their<br />
inherent worth as human beings. Diversity divides people into competing self-interest groups while<br />
favoring certain groups over others, and fosters hostility toward "politically incorrect" viewpoints<br />
and those who hold them.<br />
Redeeming the Rainbow 170