04.04.2015 Views

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Letter to the Lithuanian People (2007)<br />

I am Dr. Scott Lively, an American attorney and President of Defend the Family International,<br />

a human rights NGO. I hold a Doctor of Law and a Doctor of Theology, as well as special<br />

credentials in International Human Rights. I am the author of the Riga Declaration on Religious<br />

Freedom, Family Values and Human Rights (see http://www.defendthefamily.com/intl/), and an<br />

international lecturer on these topics.<br />

I came to Lithuania to warn the Lithuanian people about the threat posed to your society by<br />

the global homosexual political movement, which has begun to organize in your nation. At the<br />

outset, let me say that I advocate a high tolerance for the people who define themselves by their choice<br />

of a homosexual lifestyle, even while I promote a low tolerance for homosexual conduct. Homosexual<br />

activists would have you believe that tolerance for them requires total acceptance and approval of<br />

their lifestyle, but that is not obligatory, nor prudent. In fact, discrimination against homosexual<br />

behavior is necessary to protect your society from the consequences of “gay” culture, which always<br />

pushes for greater and greater liberalism in sexual attitudes, especially among young people. To see<br />

the danger of this we need look no further than Holland, where sexual liberalism promoted by the<br />

homosexual movement has led to the creation of a pedophile political party, whose right to hold seats<br />

in parliament, to advocate for the legalization of adult/child sexual relationships, has been approved<br />

by the Dutch courts.<br />

We should not, however, discriminate against persons who define themselves as homosexuals.<br />

They should be free to label themselves as they choose, no less so than other groups whose beliefs or<br />

goals are disapproved by the majority. Indeed, we can compare homosexuals to their chief adversaries,<br />

the radical nationalists. Both groups hate each other, and would like to do away with the other.<br />

Neither side is embraced by the majority, but both deserve the right to freedom of their beliefs and<br />

to freedom of speech within reasonable limits. The rest of us must be willing to tolerate these<br />

difficult neighbors to preserve civility for society as a whole.<br />

The chief danger of the homosexual movement is that it always seeks to take away the<br />

freedom of speech from anyone who disapproves of homosexuality. In Canada, where homosexual<br />

activism has enjoyed considerable success, there are now so-called Human Rights Tribunals which<br />

have the power to punish anyone who publicly opposes homosexuality by making the offender pay a<br />

monetary fine. The money is then given to the homosexual who filed the complaint. The most<br />

recent incident involved a Catholic member of the City Council of Kamloops, British Columbia. His<br />

offence was to call homosexuality “unnatural.” One wonders if Pope Benedict himself would face<br />

arrest in Canada, since he has repeatedly affirmed that homosexuality is “intrinsically disordered.”<br />

Religious opinions are also silenced wherever homosexuals gain the power to silence them.<br />

Consider a recent case from Sweden. On June 29, 2004, Pastor Ake Green was sentenced to one<br />

month in jail for showing “disrespect” against homosexuals in the sermon he delivered in his pulpit in<br />

Borgholm. The title of his sermon was “Are people born with homosexual orientation or is it the<br />

result of influence by evil powers?” Pastor Green was eventually exonerated by the Swedish Supreme<br />

Court, but only over the vigorous objection of the “gay” activists in that nation (would the result have<br />

been the same if the judges were “gay”?).<br />

Just this week In Britain, the House of Lords approved a bill to prohibit private Christian<br />

schools from teaching their students that homosexuality is wrong.<br />

Redeeming the Rainbow 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!