Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

Because if I’m right, that means the “gay agenda” is to stop everyone from following the Bible
regarding sexual matters. It is, after all, their stated goal to “stamp out homophobia.” No more
religious freedom. It’s also to suppress scientific research that has reached conclusions they don’t
like, especially if it helps people to change their homosexual orientation back to a heterosexual one
(ask the doctors and scientists at NARTH.com what they’ve had to endure). If it discourages
homosexuality, even by implication, it’s homophobic and can’t be used.
There’s a queer reasoning behind all of this. Homosexuals call me names like bigot and homophobe,
condemn my religion, mock my rational conclusions about social issues, impugn my motives, display
intense hostility toward my actions, and curse my very existence, all under the justification that I’m
a “hater.” But if I’m a “hater” for civilly opposing what they do, why aren’t they haters for uncivilly
opposing what I do? Such a double standard, in the context of a public debate on “civil rights,” is not
just hypocritical, it is surreal.
I admit I have some hate. I hate watching people kill themselves with preventable diseases like AIDS.
I hate seeing children being steered toward unhealthy lifestyles. I hate having my pro-family views
distorted by dishonest journalists, politicians and academics. And I hate seeing my God being treated
like a homophobe for what He teaches in His Bible.
So if you’re not going to stop calling me a “hater” for wanting homosexuals to be saved and healed,
or for opposing their political agenda, let’s at least see a little more of that famous “American sense
of fair play” in the public debate on this issue. Hatred of “haters” is hateful too.
Redeeming the Rainbow 154