Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

especially when used against Christians. How does the accusation of “hate” manipulate Christians? Being called hateful or “meanspirited” makes Christians feel that we have failed to be a good witness of Christ. We know that our Christian duty is to show the love of God through the example of our lives and the way we treat others. We also know that to hate one’s fellow man is to break the second great commandment. “Gay” political strategists know this about us as well. (Indeed, many homosexual activists were raised in supposedly Christian homes where parental hypocrisy or misguided legalism helped to alienate them from the church.) However, within these strategists’ end-justifies-the-means political philosophy, Christian compassion is seen not as a virtue to emulate but as a weakness to exploit for political advantage. They accuse us of hating homosexuals simply because they know it puts us on the defensive, which gives them a psychological advantage in fighting us for control of the culture. It is a calculated and cynical tactic, designed to turn Christians’ greatest strength into our greatest weakness. I know this from personal experience. During the Oregon ballot measure campaign -- throughout the very same weeks and months that my family was helping Sonny battle the horrible complications of slow death by AIDS -- I was being continually attacked in the public media as a “gay-basher” and “hate-monger” by the Oregon “gay” community. While Sonny was living with us, I assiduously avoided any appearance of exploiting him for political or public relations benefit and rarely if ever mentioned him in my many public debates and media interviews. However, many “gay” political leaders and their allies knew that we were caring for Sonny in our home. Nevertheless, they coolly conducted a long, ruthless and very personal campaign of character assassination, in order to discredit my representation of the homosexual issue to the public. The lesson here for the church is that accusations of hatred from the “gay” community and its allies will never be silenced by evidence that Christians have genuine compassion towards homosexuals. The “gay” activists will be satisfied by nothing less than the total capitulation of the culture to their agenda. In facing this challenge, Christians must be prepared to do good works, to love and minister to homosexuals, without receiving public credit. We must also resist the temptation to compromise our Biblical values to “earn the respect” of our accusers or silence their criticism. Such a response is not only personally self-destructive, it also doesn’t work. Their implied promise to respect our compromise is a trap laid to ensnare the gullible and the weak-of-faith. Christians have a reputation for being among the most gullible members of society because our desire to see the good in others makes us more vulnerable to exploitation by deceivers. The Lord, knowing that we are like sheep among wolves, specifically warns us to be “wise as serpents but innocent as doves” when we try to have an impact on the world (Matthew 10:16). Scripture also warns us that unrepentant homosexuals, being the very epitome of “reprobate” thinkers, are “filled” with deceit. (Romans 1:26-32). As much as we care for individual “gays” and lesbians we may know as family members, neighbors or co-workers, and as much as we want all homosexuals to be saved and delivered from their bondage to sin, we cannot ignore that our “gay” activist adversaries are some of the “wolves“ we were warned about. They are cunning and relentless pursuers of their own selfish interests, which they cannot achieve without first defeating us. Redeeming the Rainbow iv
Why should the “gay” agenda concern every Christian? Because it is rooted in a philosophy that is the antithesis of everything we stand for, a philosophy that is even now supplanting our values in the hearts and minds of our neighbors throughout Western Civilization. The “gay” goal for society is to replace Judeo-Christian sexual morality (monogamous heterosexual marriage and the natural family) with an alternative moral system that embraces “sexual freedom.” They know they can have no real acceptance in a society which restricts sex to authentic marriage, so “gay” activists have worked, literally for generations, to destroy marriage-based culture -- by aggressively promoting heterosexual promiscuity and fostering hostility against the chief opponent of promiscuity, the Christian church. As respect for family values and Christianity has declined, their own political power, as champions of “sexual freedom,” has increased proportionally. We have watched the destructive consequences of “sexual freedom” unfold in Western Civilization for many years now without recognizing the “gay” movement as its driving force. Now the church must wake up to the reality that the so-called “culture war” is, more than anything else, a contest between the opposing and contradictory philosophies of activist homosexuals and Christians. And we must act accordingly, despite the fact that they, and those they have duped, will call us “haters.” Redeeming the Rainbow v
Page 1 and 2: REDEEMING THE RAINBOW A Christian R
Page 3 and 4: Dedication: This book is dedicated
Page 5 and 6: Parent/Child: The Natural Extension
Page 7 and 8: Foreword A Word About Sin I believe
Page 9: Introduction Why the Homosexual Age
Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER 1: PRO-FAMILY ANSWERS TO Co
Page 15 and 16: Q6. What causes homosexuality? A6.
Page 17 and 18: specifically prohibits such discrim
Page 19 and 20: Q25. How does the “gay” movemen
Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER 2 UNDERSTANDING HOMOSEXUALI
Page 23 and 24: states, “There shall be no whore
Page 25 and 26: Methodius, bishop of Olympus and Pa
Page 27 and 28: There is not a single source in all
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 3: The Homosexual War Again
Page 31 and 32: in an effort to divide and conquer.
Page 33 and 34: up primarily of two types of people
Page 35 and 36: uilding in the “mainline” relig
Page 37 and 38: one example in the Evangelical Luth
Page 39 and 40: abbis never associated homosexualit
Page 41 and 42: If “gay” theology fosters moral
Page 43 and 44: anity Today, June 12, 2000). The pr
Page 45 and 46: logical presuppositions about sexua
Page 47 and 48: SECTION TWO: THE CHRISTIAN RESPONSE
Page 49 and 50: always lose, step backward a few pa
Page 51 and 52: and other wrong-thinking pagans to
Page 53 and 54: healthy and abnormal is unhealthy.
Page 55 and 56: percent more likely at some point i
Page 57 and 58: of a homosexual lifestyle as an adu
Page 59 and 60: entered into, is a choice made by t
Page 61 and 62:
ual. The woman so completely reject
Page 63 and 64:
homosexuals,“ and I believe they
Page 65 and 66:
WOMEN Extreme Masculinity----------
Page 67 and 68:
“Kinsey’s not-very-secret inten
Page 69 and 70:
interview, “[we wanted to] keep t
Page 71 and 72:
stronger and more intrusive to comp
Page 73 and 74:
homosexuality to schoolchildren thr
Page 75 and 76:
the GLA’s job, he set into motion
Page 77 and 78:
October 26, 2007. “UK Christian C
Page 79 and 80:
don’t want co-existence, they wan
Page 81 and 82:
Having a relatively small number of
Page 83 and 84:
pro-family advocates begin to think
Page 85 and 86:
1. The natural family, consisting o
Page 87 and 88:
2. Men and women are psychologicall
Page 89 and 90:
Task sharing is seen by the child a
Page 91 and 92:
counterpart as self-control is incr
Page 93 and 94:
CHAPTER SEVEN: THE PRO-FAMILY ARGUM
Page 95 and 96:
ad results. Surprisingly, the other
Page 97 and 98:
The Natural Family, Marriage and Fa
Page 99 and 100:
irths, of single-parent households,
Page 101 and 102:
children born from these relationsh
Page 103 and 104:
Conclusion The preceding argument c
Page 105 and 106:
Agenda? What “Gay” Agenda? One
Page 107 and 108:
associated with male and female hom
Page 109 and 110:
the property and this is his sole r
Page 111 and 112:
controlled religious denomination s
Page 113 and 114:
to add the qualifier “rational”
Page 115 and 116:
validity upon the theory of sexual
Page 117 and 118:
You: “Now we’re back where we s
Page 119 and 120:
Hope for Pro-Family Advocates I wil
Page 121 and 122:
The Triangle of Tolerance “Gay”
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 9: Not A Theocracy: A Chris
Page 125 and 126:
Christian conservatives and humanis
Page 127 and 128:
deploy the members of your team, se
Page 129 and 130:
parade organizers to exclude those
Page 131 and 132:
Sixth: Train Youth as Missionaries
Page 133 and 134:
The Pro-Family Agenda Our agenda is
Page 135 and 136:
To reiterate, each member of the te
Page 137 and 138:
“Gay” employee groups work cont
Page 139 and 140:
The Government Team Goal: the promo
Page 141 and 142:
egarding spending money on election
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 11: Christianizing the Soci
Page 145 and 146:
The Realm of Compromise This is not
Page 147 and 148:
library. 2) Gather documentation fo
Page 149 and 150:
including apologetics, critical thi
Page 151 and 152:
1) Start a school-oriented prayer g
Page 153 and 154:
Action Checklist A. Form an Intra-D
Page 155 and 156:
a working paper for projects undert
Page 157 and 158:
SECTION FOUR: RESOURCES Redeeming t
Page 159 and 160:
Is Hating “Haters” Hateful? Hat
Page 161 and 162:
Requiem for the Magna Carta One of
Page 163 and 164:
Masculine Christianity Scripture te
Page 165 and 166:
Matthew Shepard: The Horst Wessel o
Page 167 and 168:
A Letter to the Lithuanian People (
Page 169 and 170:
Riga Declaration on Religious Freed
Page 171 and 172:
their manifestation does not distur
Page 173 and 174:
THE DANGER OF “SAFE SCHOOLS” Li
Page 175 and 176:
This is not to deny the "scientific
Page 177 and 178:
In contrast, civility, a component
Page 179 and 180:
YOUTH SUICIDE USED AS “GAY” REC
Page 181 and 182:
2. Learn Your Duty The church has f
Page 183 and 184:
The church has a harder job teachin
Page 185 and 186:
Europe and Russia are suffering cal
Page 187 and 188:
Model “Family First” Ordinance
Page 189 and 190:
Model “Dale Clause” to Protect
Page 191 and 192:
Introduction Honoring diversity is
Page 193 and 194:
ONE WAY OF LOOKING AT YOU: AS A MEM
Page 195 and 196:
Looking at You as an Individual Obv
Page 197 and 198:
following ways of reacting: 1) Peop
Page 199 and 200:
If I respect you as a person with a
Page 201 and 202:
The Quality: What It Is 1. Trustwor
Page 203 and 204:
Common Sense Can Help Us Find Commo
Page 205 and 206:
Model Student Opt-Out Notice To the
Page 207 and 208:
THE HOMOSEXUAL MANIFESTO By Michael
Page 209 and 210:
The 1972 Gay Rights Platform Platfo
Page 211 and 212:
Repeal of Department of Defense dir
Page 213 and 214:
The Overhauling of Straight America
Page 215 and 216:
A media campaign to promote the Gay
Page 217 and 218:
shows. Daytime talk shows also rema
Page 219 and 220:
573) Sexual Sadism - the intentiona
Page 221 and 222:
Why Government Should Actively Prom
Page 223 and 224:
19. Government should adopt a polic
Page 225 and 226:
Fact Sheet on Same Sex Attraction a
Page 227 and 228:
Haworth Press, 173. (6) Gary Remafe
Page 229 and 230:
criticizing them.) Kinsey has been
Page 231 and 232:
Documentation in Support of the Ass
Page 233 and 234:
uled that because same-sex marriage
Page 235 and 236:
Adoption of children to homosexual
Page 237:
A Missionary to the Pro-Family Move
show all

Download entire 232-page book HERE (PDF ... - MassResistance

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?