04.04.2015 Views

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STREET TACTICS<br />

Stay back about six<br />

feet from the cover to<br />

prevent ricochets from<br />

hitting you.<br />

[ B Y G A B E S U A R E Z ]<br />

<strong>Concealed</strong> carry trainees<br />

are often admonished by<br />

their instructors to use<br />

cover in a gunfight.<br />

Use of cover is a good idea that has<br />

saved many good guys, but its<br />

tactical use must be understood<br />

and put in the correct context in order<br />

to be effective.<br />

The difference lies in the issue of who<br />

has initiative in the fight. In other words,<br />

who is being proactive and who is being<br />

reactive. Here are a couple of examples:<br />

An armed good guy sees a criminal<br />

with a knife attacking a woman and realizes<br />

that although he is not involved in<br />

the fight directly, he must get involved<br />

to save the woman’s life. So, he purposely<br />

and proactively draws his pistol and<br />

shoots the bad guy. There was no need<br />

for cover, but there was a need to take<br />

the initiative.<br />

A similar situation may be where the<br />

armed good guy happens to be at the<br />

scene of a robbery at a business. Seeing<br />

the bad guys draw their guns and approach<br />

the cashier, he may elect to take<br />

a covered position behind a stone pillar.<br />

At this point he may engage or not,<br />

depending on what he sees, but he had<br />

the ability to take a safer position than<br />

simply standing out in the open like the<br />

proverbial deer in the head lights.<br />

Both of these events developed such<br />

that the good guy had ample time to<br />

realize something was happening and<br />

make a decision to act. In the first one,<br />

cover would have been unnecessary,<br />

while in the second event, it may have<br />

been essential.<br />

There is also the second type of<br />

event—the pure surprise attack. As unpopular<br />

as it is in the gun culture to admit<br />

that these occur, not everyone can<br />

be alert in condition yellow all of the<br />

time. In these reactive events, the bad<br />

guy has the initiative, and to survive, the<br />

good guy must be able to react. In these<br />

cases, counter-attacking the assailant is<br />

probably a far better option than trying<br />

to look for cover.<br />

An example may be an armed good<br />

guy who is walking into a business. The<br />

next thing he sees is a bad guy pointing<br />

or firing a pistol at him from across the<br />

room. There is no time to do anything<br />

but move off the line of fire, draw, and<br />

shoot back. To think of cover at this<br />

point might cause a delayed response<br />

with terminal results for the good guy.<br />

Please don’t think I am eschewing<br />

<br />

<strong>US</strong>CONCEALEDCARRY.COM n CONCEALED CARRY MAGAZINE n JULY 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!