04.04.2015 Views

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

Download This Issue - US Concealed Carry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Walther_PPS_GunWOrld 5/27/08 1:27 PM Page 1<br />

The new Walther PPS-Polic Pistol Slim provides<br />

the best of both concealment and comfort by<br />

packing Walther innovation and your choice of<br />

two calibers into an unbelievable 1.04 inch<br />

profile. Available in both 9mm and .40 S&W, the<br />

PPS packs in more power.<br />

of the history and issues pertaining<br />

to the Second Amendment to the <strong>US</strong><br />

Constitution can be an eye opener.<br />

The scholarly debate was resolved<br />

years ago. Scholars now generally agree<br />

that the Second Amendment’s guarantee<br />

of the right to keep and bear arms<br />

referred to individual’s private arms,<br />

used for the purpose of protecting<br />

themselves, their families, their communities,<br />

their state, and their country—and<br />

as a last resort to protect<br />

themselves from the tyranny of their<br />

own government. Our Founders considered<br />

private arms both an individual<br />

right and a moral obligation of citizenship.<br />

Since 1980 there have been over<br />

60 published law-journal articles, and<br />

all but four of them find the individualrights<br />

view compelling. Of the four articles<br />

which take the states’-rights view,<br />

two were written by lawyers on the payroll<br />

of Handgun Control, Inc. or its sister<br />

organizations, one by a non-lawyer<br />

lobbyist of HCI, and one by an anti-gun<br />

politician. 8<br />

The plain meaning of the words of<br />

the Second Amendment are even more<br />

clear when one consults the hundreds<br />

of references to them by the Founders.<br />

Here are a few examples:<br />

“Arms in the hands of individual citizens<br />

may be used at individual discretion...in<br />

private self-defense.” — John<br />

Adams, A Defense Of The Constitution<br />

(1787-88).<br />

“The Constitution shall never be<br />

construed to prevent the people of the<br />

United States who are peaceable citizens<br />

from keeping their own arms.” —<br />

Samuel Adams (1788).<br />

“As civil rulers, not having their duty<br />

to the people before them, may attempt<br />

to tyrannize, and as the military forces<br />

which must be occasionally raised to<br />

defend our country, might pervert their<br />

power to the injury of their fellow citizens,<br />

the people are confirmed by the<br />

article [2nd Amendment] in their right<br />

to keep and bear their private arms.”<br />

— Trench Coxe, “Remarks on the First<br />

Part of the Amendments to the Federal<br />

Constitution,” Philadelphia Federal<br />

Gazette, June 18, 1789, p. 2, col. 1.<br />

In response to a proposal for gun registration:<br />

“Absolutely not! If the people<br />

are armed and the federalists do not<br />

know where the arms are, there can<br />

never be an oppressive government.”<br />

— George Washington.<br />

Under the laws of 18th century<br />

England, most of the thirteen colonies,<br />

and the United States for the first century<br />

of its existence, able bodied males<br />

age 16 to 60 were not only permitted,<br />

but required to possess military type<br />

arms (“assault weapons”). The same<br />

Congress that wrote the Bill of Rights<br />

enacted the Militia Act of 1790 that so<br />

stated. Current federal law also states:<br />

“The militia of the United States consist<br />

of all able-bodied males at least 17 years<br />

of age…The classes of the militia are (1)<br />

the organized militia, which consists of<br />

the National Guard…and (2) the unorganized<br />

militia, which consist of members<br />

of the militia who are not members<br />

of the National Guard…” 9<br />

The National Guard, which didn’t exist<br />

for the first century of this country’s<br />

existence, was specifically raised under<br />

Congress’s Constitutional power<br />

to “raise and support armies,” and not<br />

under its power to “provide for organizing,<br />

arming and disciplining the militia.”<br />

Why? Because an army can be sent<br />

abroad (as it has several times), while<br />

the militia can be used only to protect<br />

the home ground against invaders.<br />

(House Report No. 141, 73rd Congress,<br />

1st Sess. (1933), pp.2-5.) Furthermore,<br />

the Second Amendment could not refer<br />

to the arms of the National Guard, since<br />

the Guard’s weapons are owned by the<br />

federal government. 10<br />

The <strong>US</strong> Supreme Court has in all cases<br />

dealing with the Second Amendment<br />

affirmed the rights of individuals to<br />

keep and bear their private arms. For<br />

example, in <strong>US</strong> v. Cruickshank, Presser v.<br />

Illinois, and other post-Civil War cases,<br />

the Supreme Court clearly recognized<br />

that the Second Amendment protected<br />

individual rights to keep and bear arms,<br />

but rejected the defendant’s cases on<br />

the now discredited grounds that the<br />

Fourteenth Amendment didn’t extend<br />

the protection of the Bill of Rights to actions<br />

by the states. 11<br />

The following are examples of cases<br />

in which the Court explicitly recognized<br />

that the Second Amendment clearly<br />

guarantees individuals the right to their<br />

private arms:<br />

28<br />

<strong>US</strong>CONCEALEDCARRY.COM n CONCEALED CARRY MAGAZINE n JULY 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!