01.04.2015 Views

Cancer Statistics - Karmanos Cancer Institute

Cancer Statistics - Karmanos Cancer Institute

Cancer Statistics - Karmanos Cancer Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gender Differences in Lung <strong>Cancer</strong> Survival<br />

Investigator: Michele L. Cote, PhD<br />

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer<br />

death in the United States. 1 It is estimated that<br />

in 2005, 172,570 individuals in the United<br />

States were diagnosed with lung cancer, and<br />

163,510 died of the disease. 1 Men are more<br />

likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer than<br />

women. In 2002, the age-adjusted incidence<br />

rates of lung cancer were 77.8 cases per<br />

100,000 men, and 50.8 cases per 100,000<br />

women. 2 Only prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women<br />

were diagnosed more often. Survival from lung cancer is poor, with<br />

a five-year survival rate of 13.6% for men and 17.5% in women<br />

from 1995-2001. 2 Approximately 6 in 10 individuals with lung<br />

cancer die within a year of diagnosis. 1 Survival is greater for women<br />

than for men at every stage of diagnosis. Little is known about<br />

gender-related differences in risk and survival.<br />

Current or former cigarette smoking remains the greatest risk<br />

factor for lung cancer development, yet women are more likely to<br />

report never smoking than men, and also tend to smoke less than<br />

their male counterparts. 3 Histologic type of lung cancer varies by<br />

gender as well, with women more likely to develop adenocarcinomas<br />

compared to men. 4 Evidence suggests these differences could be<br />

due, in part, to hormonal variation and exposure to estrogens. 5<br />

Women have higher circulating endogenous levels of estrogen compared<br />

to men, and are also exposed to synthetic estrogens through<br />

hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives. Estrogens<br />

can increase cell proliferation. 6 Estrogens may also increase lung<br />

cancer risk by modulating gene expression of other enzymes, particularly<br />

the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolizing enzymes<br />

such as the cytochrome p450s. 7 Several other genes thought to<br />

increase risk of lung cancer, including the c-erbB2 receptor, are also<br />

activated by estrogens. 8 Cellular response to estrogens is mediated<br />

by estrogen receptors (ER). Two receptors, ER-α and ER-β, which<br />

are encoded by separate genes have been identified and are expressed<br />

in the lung. It is feasible that ER status plays a role in lung<br />

carcinogenesis, may impact survival, and may be a potential target<br />

for therapy.<br />

We have recently received funding by the National Lung <strong>Cancer</strong><br />

Partnership and the LUNGevity Foundation to examine the effect<br />

of ER expression on survival after a lung cancer diagnosis. We seek<br />

to clarify whether ER status and aromatase expression is associated<br />

with prognosis and may serve as therapeutic targets. Targeting<br />

hormone receptors has been successful in both chemoprevention<br />

and treatment in a variety of cancers. The role hormones play in<br />

lung cancer prognosis in humans has yet to be fully explored. These<br />

analyses will aid in the understanding of the underlying biological<br />

processes of lung cancer, and potentially lead to novel targets for<br />

treatment of lung cancer.<br />

PERCENTAGE<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

References:<br />

5 Year Relative Survival Rates for Lung <strong>Cancer</strong><br />

by Gender in Metropolitan Detroit, 1973 – 2004<br />

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995<br />

YEAR DIAGNOSED - 3 YEAR MOVING AVERAGE<br />

Female<br />

Male<br />

2000<br />

2000<br />

1. American <strong>Cancer</strong> Society I. Key <strong>Statistics</strong> for Lung <strong>Cancer</strong>, 2004<br />

2. Ries LAG EM, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Feuer EJ,<br />

Edwards BK (eds). SEER <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> Review, 1975-2002. In: Ries LAG EM,<br />

Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Edwards<br />

BK (eds). ed: National <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>. Bethesda, MD, 2005<br />

3. (CDC) CfDCaP. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data.<br />

In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Atlanta, Georgia, 2003<br />

4. Charloux A, Quoix E, Wolkove N, et al. The increasing incidence of lung<br />

adenocarcinoma: reality or artefact? A review of the epidemiology of lung<br />

adenocarcinoma. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26:14-23.<br />

5. Taioli E, Wynder EL. Re: Endocrine factors and adenocarcinoma of the lung<br />

in women. J Natl <strong>Cancer</strong> Inst 1994; 86:869-870<br />

6. Ethier SP. Growth factor synthesis and human breast cancer progression.<br />

J Natl <strong>Cancer</strong> Inst 1995; 87:964-973<br />

7. Thomsen JS, Wang X, Hines RN, et al. Restoration of aryl hydrocarbon (Ah)<br />

responsiveness in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells by transient expression<br />

of the estrogen receptor. Carcinogenesis 1994; 15:933-937<br />

8. Matsuda S, Kadowaki Y, Ichino M, et al. 17 beta-estradiol mimics ligand activity<br />

of the c-erbB2 protooncogene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;<br />

90:10803-10807<br />

* Source: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program<br />

(www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 17 Regs Limited-Use,<br />

Nov 2006 Sub (1973-2004 varying) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S.,<br />

1969-2004 Counties, National <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>, DCCPS, Surveillance Research<br />

Program, <strong>Cancer</strong> <strong>Statistics</strong> Branch, released April 2007, based on the November<br />

2006 submission.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!